Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Josephine Nowacki

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Josephine Nowacki

  • Postcode verified

    WA2 8QA

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthighly effectivevery effectivevery wellstrongwarmstronglyeffective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings316w+89
  • What needs to improve86w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
388
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Paul Hafren Principal and Chief Executive Warrington Collegiate Winwick Road Warrington Cheshire WA2 8QA

p.1

progress and achieve

Thank you for your warm welcome and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 22-23 February to look at your work in supporting students to progress and achieve.

p.1

progress and achieve

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in supporting college students. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your college is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress and achieve

The evidence used to inform the judgements included scrutiny of documentation and meetings with senior managers, support staff and students.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Highly evaluative approach to the review and development of student support services in response to funding cuts, particularly in relation to the monitoring of students’ academic progress.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Very committed staff focus strongly on meeting individual students’ needs and helping them to achieve their potential.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Close liaison between personal tutors and pastoral staff ensures the close monitoring of students’ academic and pastoral progress.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Very effective strategies to improve retention and attendance including the appointment of two retention officers.  Excellent use of data to monitor students’ attendance. The college’s highly effective reporting system promotes systematic and close monitoring of attendance at lessons. Attendance is good.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Effective transition and pre-planning arrangements to ensure support for students is in place as soon as they arrive in college.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 Strong partnerships with external agencies to support students’ health including their mental health, and well-being very well.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 The clear focus on providing value for money through ongoing reviews of tutorial provision and its impact on students’ performance and enjoyment of college.

p.2

Areas for improvement

 The need to ensure greater consistency in the quality of personal tutoring.

p.2

Areas for improvement

 The need to ensure that all personal tutors set targets for students that are detailed and measurable.

p.2

Areas for improvement

 The need to streamline the electronic individual learning plans to ensure that they have a greater impact on students’ success.

p.2

Areas for improvement

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your approaches to providing support for your students. As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion