Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Josephine Nowacki

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Josephine Nowacki

  • Postcode verified

    LA9 5AY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualityexcellentstrongvery effectivevery wellextremelyhigh qualitywarm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings599w+92
  • What needs to improve71w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
656
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

3 March 2012 Mr G Wilkinson Principal and Chief Executive Kendal College Milnthorpe Road Kendal Cumbria LA9 5AY

p.1

Ofsted 2011 – 12 best practice survey: supporting college students to

p.1

progress and achieve

Thank you for your warm welcome and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 27 and 28 February 2012 to look at your work in supporting students to progress and achieve.

p.1

progress and achieve

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in supporting college students. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your college is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress and achieve

The evidence used to inform the judgements included scrutiny of documentation and meetings with senior managers, support staff and students.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The clear and holistic approach to the continuous development of student support services provides value for money and plays a significant role in helping students to stay on their courses and achieve very well.  Highly committed and enthusiastic staff provide extensive academic and pastoral support that is valued extremely highly by students.  A well-established personal tutor role, carried out by teachers, enables the progress of students to be monitored closely and regularly. A comprehensive, easy-to-use electronic system is very effective in recording and tracking the students’ performance and progress.  The new group tutorial programme ‘review for success’ is beginning to have a positive impact on students’ personal and social development, including their ability to evaluate their own performance and their skills in setting specific academic and personal goals.  Students greatly value the very high-quality, realistic work environment

p.1

Features of good practice observed

and they have very good opportunities to engage in real work settings outside the college. For example, in catering, the student culinary team supervises and provides the catering at high profile external events realistically and reflects industry team working. The student construction team built bus shelters around the town and engage in other community projects. Funds from these activities support the students on international field study trips which provide supervisory experience for level 3 students  Excellent opportunities exist for students to be involved in vocationally relevant trips, competitions and other events, including highly successful entries to the ‘World Skills’ event. For example, the college’s ‘augmented reality installation’ project has already received both national and international acclaim.  Extensive support for progression to university results in a high proportion of students entering higher education. The college’s newly introduced

p.2

Features of good practice observed

tutorial programme has a strong focus on equipping students with high- quality employability skills. A full-time manager focuses successfully in re- engaging those young people not in education, employment or training.  Robust quality assurance procedures ensure that students’ progress is monitored closely, that targets set for individual students are specific and measurable, and that tutorials are delivered to the high standard expected by the college. Very good and systematic use is made of student feedback to inform actions for improvement in student services.  High-quality accommodation is provided, and staff give close attention to sustainability in all aspects of the college’s work. The college’s latest developments, including the new catering restaurant with Art Gallery and the new theatre, are fine examples of the college’s commitment to raising students’ aspirations through the provision of World Class work

p.2

Features of good practice observed

environments.  A strong focus on students’ safety incorporates bright social spaces that offer a safe and welcoming environment for studying.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 continuing to fully evaluate the revised group tutorial arrangements and the impact of these on other aspects of student support, including individual tutorials, to ensure that the existing high quality provision is not jeopardised.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your approaches to providing support for your students. As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion