Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joy Montgomery

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joy Montgomery

  • Postcode verified

    SK2 6NG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery welleffectiveclear
Criticismnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings415w+55
  • What needs to improve113w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
522
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs L Rutter YMCA Training 9 th Floor St. Christopher House 217 Wellington Road Stockport SK2 6NG

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visits on 30 November and 1 December 2011 and 21 February 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, and participants; scrutiny of relevant documents; and an observation of a learning session in motor vehicle studies.

p.1

Key findings

 Since August 2011, YMCA Training has built on its good track record of delivering programmes to unemployed young people and adults. Careful strategic planning has ensured that the employability provision fits very well into the organisation’s overall business model and that it links well to other programmes so that clear progression routes are offered to all participants.  YMCA Training makes effective use of labour market research, local knowledge and sector-specific expertise to develop and pilot new provision for unemployed people. Staff have developed well-defined models of delivery for ‘sector clubs’ in seven subject areas that employers have also endorsed. This work has included the development of a clear implementation plan and thorough management information systems to enable managers to monitor and evaluate this new provision. Systems for monitoring participants’ destinations and progression into employment are

p.1

Key findings

in place but not yet tested.  YMCA Training has invested significant time in identifying units that are funded, are available at appropriate levels, form part of full qualifications and are suitable for unemployed participants. However, only a few participants have started these programmes as building links with local jobcentres and work programme providers across multiple sites across England is taking time.  The development of the new programmes for unemployed participants has involved devising new processes and forms. It is too early to judge how effective these are and YMCA Training is aware of the need to review these forms to ensure that they capture all relevant information and provide participants with clear action plans.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 continuing to develop links with jobcentres and work programme providers to ensure that they understand the range of provision YMCA Training offers participants in each geographical area  ensuring that staff identify carefully participants’ barriers to employment and development needs in employability skills and vocational knowledge, and agree appropriate actions with them to support their development.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at YMCA.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion