Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lorna Brackstone

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lorna Brackstone

  • Postcode verified

    RG30 3TX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery welloutstandingmake good progressextremelypositiveclearlysecureconsistent
Criticisminconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings768w+68
  • What needs to improve123w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
875
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Gallagher Headteacher Burghfield St Mary's C.E. Primary School, Theale Road Burghfield Village Reading RG30 3TX

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visits on 18 October 2011 and 21 February 2012 to look at your work in transition from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1.

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

The visits provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

The evidence used to inform the judgements included observations of two lessons in the Year 1 class and a short visit to the Reception class. Interviews were held with staff, pupils, parents and carers. Pupils’ work was analysed and relevant documents were scrutinised.

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

Overall, the transition from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1 is good.

p.1

Key findings

 Children start school with skills that are as expected for their age. They achieve well in the Early Years Foundation Stage and start Year 1 with standards that are above those expected for their age. This good achievement is maintained well in Year 1. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress because they are supported well in class and their progress is carefully monitored.  The school carefully considers the assessments it receives from the pre- school settings. Detailed observations of the children are made during the first few weeks in Reception, the findings of which are used well to plan activities which meet individual needs and develop specific skills. They are also used to set future targets for achievement as the children move through the school.  The progress of children who are summer born or whose parents work for the Armed Forces are very carefully monitored and their progress

p.1

Key findings

evaluated regularly. Teaching assistants are used well to support those groups of pupils whose circumstances make them vulnerable. For example, some boys whose parents are in the Armed Forces are given additional help to develop their social and emotional skills. However, leaders and managers recognise the need to introduce more detailed systems to monitor and evaluate the progress pupils make in their personal, social, and emotional development as they move through the school.  Children are taught well in the Early Years Foundation Stage and this is maintained well in Year 1 through a team-teaching approach deployed across the two age groups. Teaching assistants are used extremely well to support groups of pupils and individuals with special educational needs and/or disabilities.  Classrooms are stimulating learning areas where staff interact very well with the children. Lessons are lively and most move along at a good pace.

p.2

Key findings

Visual prompts are used well to reinforce key skills. Good use is made of the outdoor area as an integral part of the learning environment.  The use of target cards to promote progress in reading, writing and mathematics is an outstanding feature of Year 1 provision. Pupils use their target cards on a daily basis and have a very good understanding of what they have achieved so far and what they need to do next in their learning. Nevertheless, while there are some examples of good quality marking in the pupils’ workbooks, there are inconsistencies in approach.  The school uses detailed systems to monitor pupils’ achievement. The value added to pupils’ progress is clearly evident and is particularly good in reading and writing.  Reception children contribute well to their learning by suggesting themes to explore such as winter and the Chinese New Year. Year 1 pupils follow the same topic plan as Year 2. Interesting and exciting experiences are

p.2

Key findings

planned for them. For example, a topic on ‘Ocean World’ has included the study of islands, creative work on pirates and learning about aspects of history related to the sea, such as The Titanic. Specialist teaching for modern foreign languages and music provides consistency.  The positive attitudes of the children in Reception to staff and to each other, and the eagerness in which they learn are maintained well as they move into Year 1. Their good behaviour results in high levels of engagement in lessons.  School leaders and managers have a very secure understanding of the significant role that the Early Years Foundation Stage and Year 1 play in the development of children’s skills. They are uncompromising in ensuring that children receive the best possible start to their education.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 introducing a system to monitor pupils’ personal, social and emotional development as they move through the school  ensuring that the marking of pupils’ work in Year 1 is consistent and helps them to recognise what they can do well and guides then towards the next step in their learning  considering extending the use of the team-teaching approach by ability grouping across the two year groups.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop transition at your school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion