Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gehane Gordelier

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gehane Gordelier

  • Postcode verified

    PO41 0RA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedstrongwell plannedimprovingpositivehappyconsistentlysecure
Criticismnot alwaystoo fewgapsmissednot effectivelylower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings760w−2
  • What needs to improve190w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
936
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs B Miller Headteacher Yarmouth Church of England Aided Primary School Mill Road Yarmouth PO41 0RA

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visits on 26 September 2011 and 28 February 2012 to look at your work in transition from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1.

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

The visits provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: responses from parents and carers in Year 1 to a questionnaire; interviews with Year 1 parents, carers and pupils; discussions with senior leaders, teachers and support staff in Reception and Year 1; scrutiny of relevant documentation and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools

Overall, the transition from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1 is satisfactory.

p.1

Key findings

 Staff make use of a range of information about children before they start school and when they first enter the Reception year. However, children’s attainment on entry is not measured closely enough against age-related expectations.  Children make satisfactory progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage and reach a satisfactory level of development for their age by the end of Reception. Although showing signs of improvement this year, in the last two years too few reached a good level of development, particularly in their communication, language and literacy.  There is a strong focus in the Reception year on pupils’ personal, social and emotional development. This contributes well to their ability to work independently and purposefully at Key Stage 1. Pupils’ progress in their personal, social and emotional development continues to be tracked and monitored during Year 1. This is so that gaps are addressed through

p.1

Key findings

activities such as circle time and role play; with pupils learning, for example, to share and take turns.  Pupils make satisfactory progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Key Stage 1, with their progress accelerating in Year 2. They attain standards that are broadly average.  The quality of teaching in the mixed Reception and Year 1 class is satisfactory and improving. The focus on learning has improved since the autumn term. Although, activities are still not always as well matched as they could be to the interests and needs of all pupils, staff now provide pupils with a better range of different tasks according to pupils’ abilities. At times, opportunities are missed to use practical activities and resources to develop pupils’ understanding of mathematical concepts, especially for those pupils of lower ability. While the more able pupils are provided with greater challenge, they are still capable of achieving more, particularly in

p.2

Key findings

writing and mathematics if provided with suitably stimulating activities.  The improved focus of teaching pupils about letters and the sounds they represent (phonics) is accelerating pupils’ progress in learning to read and write. The strategy of teaching phonics contributes well to the school’s policy on inclusion. This is because the teaching of letters and sounds is helping to secure improving literacy standards. Consequently, all pupils, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs progress well and reach national expectations with their reading and writing by the end of Key Stage 1.  The curriculum, although well planned, is not always delivered as effectively as it could be. This is because although staff focus on what pupils need to learn, they do not always consider equally well how that learning will be best achieved.  Since the autumn term the school has produced a transition policy aimed

p.2

Key findings

at providing a smooth and positive transition for pupils from one stage to another. Senior leaders have also formalised a timetable for transition- related activities. However, transition improvement planning does not include enough quantified targets against which progress can be measured.  Parents and carers are of the view that the transition for their children from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Year 1 is seamless. This is because their children remain in the same class with the same staff due to the school having just one classroom for children who are in both year groups. Parents, carers and children are happy with the school's current arrangements. However, some parents and carers would welcome more guidance about what will be expected of their children in Year 1, especially in mathematics.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that staff assess children’s attainment on entry in relation to age- related expectations  increasing the proportion of children who reach a good level of development by the end of the Reception year, particularly in communication, language and literacy  ensuring that teaching for pupils in Year 1 is consistently good or better by:  providing all pupils with appropriate support and sufficient challenge  ensuring that teaching takes full account of how pupils learn best and not just what they need to learn  formally monitoring the impact of the newly developed transition policy and ensuring that the transition action plan includes interim milestones so that progress can be measured  providing parents and carers with more guidance about what will be expected of their children in Year 1, especially in mathematics.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop transition at your school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion