Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Crossway Services Limited in St Helens
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Feb 2012
- Inspectors verified
Michelle Bacon
- URN verified
SC386810
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 93
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC386810 Inspection date 01/02/2012 Inspector Michelle Bacon Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 09/08/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
The home is privately owned and provides care and accommodation for one young person of either sex.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress.
p.4
Progress
This home is currently judged as outstanding; however, it has been judged as making satisfactory progress at this interim inspection. There has been some progress on the recommendations set at the last inspection. The safeguarding procedures have been ratified by the Local Safeguarding Children's Board. However, a satisfactory development plan is not in yet in place and, therefore, this recommendation has been reinstated. A third recommendation, to include details of how a young person can contact their Independent Reviewing officer and the Children’s Rights Director if they wish to raise a concern about their care, has been addressed.
p.4
Progress
There have been some changes to the staff team since the last full inspection, although this has not impacted on the quality of care young people receive and their placements remain stable. Despite this, young people are only making satisfactory progress in terms of their health and education. Although young people are being supported to maintain a healthy lifestyle and make healthy choices they are not always achieving this. Furthermore, young people's attendance at school has become problematic. However, the staff have imposed measures to redress this and improve outcomes for young people in these areas.
p.4
Progress
The home is still decorated and maintained to a high standard and provides a safe environment for young people. Evaluation of the quality of care is undertaken each month and copies of these reports have been forwarded to Ofsted. The home demonstrates capacity for continued improvement.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
provide a written development plan which details any planned changes in the operation or resources of the service. ( NMS 15.2)
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion