Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Castle Homes Care Limited in Birmingham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Feb 2012
- Inspectors verified
Gwen Buckley
- URN verified
SC377825
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 116
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 35, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC377825 Inspection date 07/02/2012 Inspector Gwen Buckley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 10/08/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
This children's home is part of a large organisation operated by a private company. The home is registered to provide care for up to three children who have learning disabilities and social, emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
At the last inspection in September 2011 the overall effectiveness judgement was outstanding. One recommendation was made relating to ensuring, subject to their understanding, young people understand their care plan and any decision about their care. This has been met, staff support young people to develop their own care plan so that they understand the reasons for their placement and are involved in the care planning process.
p.4
Progress
Other developments have taken place. Menus have been amended taking into consideration the likes and dislikes of the young people at the home. The development of the games room is ongoing with a plan that young people paint a mural. Celebration days have been introduced to help young people and staff understand different cultures. Young people and staff research a culture to develop their knowledge and understanding of the differences and prepare a celebration meal reflecting the chosen topic at the end of the event.
p.4
Progress
Regulation 33 visits take place as required and reports of these visits are available to staff and young people in the home. Regulation 34 quality monitoring occurs regularly by the Registered Manager, however, no report is available or sent to Ofsted that reflects the findings or action taken as a result of this quality monitoring process, this is therefore raised as a recommendation.
p.4
Progress
Staff know the young people well and take action to meet their varying needs. Young people feel safe and well cared for and say, ‘I have been made very welcome at the home, staff care for you here and help you keep in touch with family and friends.’ They also say there is a member of staff they can talk to any time of the day or night if they are upset or want to talk about any concerns.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s): produce and send a copy of Regulation 34 monitoring findings to HMCI within twenty eight days of completion. This specifically relates to producing and sending the reports at six monthly intervals. (Children Act 1989 Guidance and Regulations, Volume 5, paragraph 3.14)
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion