Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Abbey Grange Church of England Academy
Summary
Clive Moss (lead), James Kidd, James McGrath, Robert Birtwell, Steven Goldsmith
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Feb 2012
- Inspectors verified
Clive Moss, James Kidd, James McGrath, Robert Birtwell, Steven Goldsmith
- Name on report verified
Abbey Grange Church of England Academy
- URN verified
137083
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Provision for the social, moral, spiritual, and cultural development of the students is excellent, involving exemplary widespread practice throughout the curriculum. p.7
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.8
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.8
- The governing body is ambitious for the school and keen to support the staff in improving it from an already strong base. p.7
- These have led to some excellent examples of work with the students, for example in sociology lessons about gender issues and crime. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,432
- about usual (typical 2508)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Abbey Grange Church of England Academy Inspection report
p.1
Age group 11–18 Inspection date(s) 8–9 February 2012 Inspection number 385572 Unique Reference Number 137083 Local authority Leeds Inspection number 385572 Inspection dates 8–9 February 2012 Lead inspector Clive Moss HMI
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Secondary School category Academy Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1,223 Of which number on roll in the sixth form 204 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Anne Wilson Headteacher Carol Kitson Date of previous school inspection 7 May 2009 School address Butcher Hill Leeds LS16 5EA Telephone number 0113 2757877 Fax number 0113 2754794 Email address info@abbeygrange.leeds.sch.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.1
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.2
To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
Clive Moss Steven Goldsmith Her Majesty's Inspector Additional inspector Robert Birtwell Additional inspector James McGrath Additional inspector James Kidd Additional inspector
p.3
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspectors observed teaching and learning in 48 lessons taught by 46 teachers. Telephone discussions were held with parents and carers. The inspectors met with groups of students and spoke with them informally in lessons and around the school, and governors; and staff. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the academy's work, and looked at a range of documentation, including the school improvement plan, analyses of surveys of parents’ and carers’ views carried out by the academy, records of monitoring of the quality of teaching, safeguarding documentation, records relating to support for individual students, policies such as the academy’s equalities scheme, and records relating to behaviour, including the racist incidents log. The inspectors looked at 176 questionnaires returned by parents and carers, 183 from students, and 46
p.3
Information about the school
Abbey Grange C of E Academy is larger than the average secondary school. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is below average, but has risen since the previous inspection. The proportion of students from minority ethnic groups is average and has risen since the previous inspection. The proportion of students with English as an additional language is below average. The proportion of students with special educational needs supported at the ‘school action’ level is below average; it is well below average for those with a statement of special educational needs. The academy is a specialist school for the humanities. It meets the government floor standards, which set minimum expectations for attainment and progress. It holds a nationally-recognised award for the quality of its work in study support. The school has changed its status and become an academy since the previous inspection. A separate section 48 inspection, on behalf of the Diocese of Ripon and
p.3
Information about the school
Leeds, took place at the same time as this inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key Findings
The academy provides the students with a good education. There are particular, significant strengths in its excellent provision for the students’ social, moral, spiritual, and cultural development, and in the quality of the support given to individual students who either need additional help, or who are at risk of underachieving. The sixth form is good.
p.4
Key Findings
The students achieve well. The quality of teaching is routinely good. The teachers inculcate good learning habits in the students, who respond well. The students are keen to learn and seize the opportunities they are provided with avidly. As a result, they make good progress in lessons. However, the teaching does not provide them with sufficient opportunities to take responsibility for their own learning. There is some excellent practice in the marking of the students’ work, but the quality is too variable, as it was at the previous inspection. Also, some parents and carers do not receive enough information with sufficient detail, or at appropriate times to enable them to support their children’s learning to best effect.
p.4
Key Findings
The students are polite, good-humoured and dignified young people, who delight in conversation and discussion on a broad range of issues and conduct themselves sensibly and safely around the school. Students from all backgrounds mix together very well.
p.4
Key Findings
The calm and orderly atmosphere and the ethos for learning that pervades the academy reflect good leadership and management. There have been significant changes in personnel and in the status of the academy since the previous inspection, both of which are leading to new and unfamiliar ways of working. Nevertheless, generally, the students, parents and carers, and the staff continue to express high levels of confidence in the academy.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure consistently high levels of challenge for all students by: - providing frequent and regular opportunities for them to take responsibility for their own learning - using techniques for questioning students and involving all of them in thinking about and discussing topics deeply - providing feedback during lessons that is focused on pushing them to higher levels - marking the students’ work so that they have clear commentary and guidance that routinely challenges them to achieve at higher levels. Enable parents and carers to contribute fully to the achievement of their children by: - providing them with sufficient and appropriate information about their children’s progress and attainment - ensuring that they receive the information sufficiently frequently and at useful times throughout the year - offering them clear guidance about the most effective ways of supporting their children’s learning - ensuring that dialogue between the school and parents and carers facilitates
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Overall, the students make better progress than might be expected, given their starting points, including those from minority ethnic groups and those with English as an additional language. Pupils known to be eligible for free school meals make better progress than similar pupils nationally and reach higher levels of attainment. Pupils’ attainment at the end of Key Stage 4 is consistently high and above average in the sixth form. A greater proportion of students complete their sixth-form courses than is the case nationally. Most parents and carers agree that their children are making good progress. A combination of circumstances resulted in untypically weak performance in English in 2011. The academy’s data show that the students’ progress and attainment in English have now returned to the levels seen more usually in previous years. This was confirmed by scrutiny of work and lesson observations during the inspection. For example, in an outstanding English lesson,
p.5
Achievement of pupils
the relentless sense of challenge created by the teachers’ sophisticated questioning elicited high-level responses from the students, who made rapid progress and took evident pleasure in each other’s achievement.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Generally, learning proceeds at a brisk pace in lessons. The students exhibit very positive attitudes and sustain good levels of concentration throughout. They apply themselves diligently to the tasks set and maintain a good work rate. They answer questions articulately and fluently and show considerable capacity to think deeply and to reflect on difficult topics. The students rise to a challenge very well and their oral contributions to lessons demonstrate their capacity to think deeply and reflect on complex issues, when given the opportunity. Disabled students and those with special educational needs make good progress in lessons as a result of well-conceived, individualised support.
p.5
Quality of teaching
The teachers have good knowledge of their subjects. They plan lessons thoughtfully, with a variety of activities that sustain the interest of the students well. The school uses a variety of strategies to support both groups and individuals who need additional help. The students receiving additional support speak highly of it. Teachers focus well on developing the students’ literacy, communication, and numeracy skills in a wide variety of subjects. Lessons provide many imaginative opportunities for the students to develop their social, moral, spiritual, and cultural awareness, from a sociology lesson in which the students discussed issues of social inequality, to a history lesson in which the students gave very impressive responses to complex issues connected with the Treaty of Versailles.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Most parents and carers responding to the inspection questionnaire think that their children are taught well, as do most of the students. The inspection evidence supports that view. In the best lessons observed by the inspectors, the teachers ensured a good level of challenge for the students. Such lessons provided good opportunities for students to learn independently and be actively involved in solving meaningful problems and had a powerful effect on the students’ confidence. They involved the teachers asked increasingly probing questions of the students, who were enabled to engage in debate about significant issues. The teachers’ approach ensured that every student took part; there was no hiding place in the lesson! More generally, however, the students were not invited to comment on each other’s contributions, ask their own questions, or provided with enough feedback on their answers. The students with whom the inspectors spoke were able to state how well they
p.6
Quality of teaching
were doing and knew what they could do to improve. The inspectors found excellent examples of clear and detailed marking in students’ work, but not consistently. The marking does not provide sufficiently clear guidance often enough aimed at challenging the students to reach even higher standards. In a minority of lessons, students learn passively, because the teaching does not provide opportunities for them to engage with the learning actively, or to show initiative and take responsibility for developing their own learning.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Students settle into the academy quickly; for example, one Year 10 student who had joined only a few weeks before the inspection, told an inspector how he had been helped to feel very much at ease very quickly. The staff show constant concern to promote the students’ welfare. Sixth-form students are integrated fully into the life of the academy. They contribute significantly to the purposeful learning ethos that permeates the academy, for example, by being actively involved in lessons with younger students, in order to add to the support the younger students receive.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Almost all parents and carers who returned the inspection questionnaire said that their children feel safe at the academy and a clear majority endorsed that view strongly. The view is echoed in other surveys carried out by the academy and in the comments of students. Attendance is high. The students, the staff, and parents and carers particularly report that behaviour is good typically. The students told the inspectors that bullying and instances of racist behaviour were rare and handled promptly, sensitively and effectively when they occur. They admitted that homophobic language was used from time to time, but were unequivocal in saying this is not tolerated by the staff. The students have themselves led assemblies on the subject of homophobic bullying and student anti-bullying ambassadors take the initiative in highlighting the dangers of different forms of bullying and how it can be tackled. The rates of short-term exclusions for misbehaviour are below average and the
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
number of permanent exclusions is half the national average. Discussions with the students confirmed that the academy works very effectively with students to help them improve their behaviour, so that individuals are increasingly involved less in disciplinary matters. There are few instances of individuals receiving multiple short-term exclusions or referrals to the school’s internal isolation provision. However, boys and students with special educational needs are more likely to receive a short-term exclusion than those from other groups.
p.7
Leadership and management
The governing body is ambitious for the school and keen to support the staff in improving it from an already strong base. The students’ attainment is increasing. The proportion of students gaining higher GCSE grades is improving consistently, faster than nationally, so that the extent to which the academy is above the national average is increasing. Similarly, there is a clear, improving trend in A-Level results in the sixth form. The trends demonstrate the academy’s good capacity to improve. Performance in the specialist subjects is significantly better than for those subjects nationally.
p.7
Leadership and management
Clear management structures ensure that the staff are involved routinely in discussing the effectiveness of their work. Systems for monitoring and analysing the progress of students are much improved since the previous inspection and being used much more consistently throughout the academy. The school uses a wide range of partnerships with other educational establishments and external agencies successfully to support improvements in the quality of teaching, including in the sixth form.
p.7
Leadership and management
The curriculum meets the needs of the students well, including in the sixth form. It is adapted to meet individual needs. Provision for the social, moral, spiritual, and cultural development of the students is excellent, involving exemplary widespread practice throughout the curriculum. It is valued particularly highly by parents and carers. Its impact is summed up by a comment from an elderly member of the community who had worked with the students to learn how to use a mobile ’phone; ‘The students were very helpful and nothing was too much for them.’ Generally, parents and carers hold the academy in high regard and the academy operates a range of mechanisms for keeping them informed. The inspectors received a number of comments praising aspects of the academy’s work, often involving examples of the support provided to individual students experiencing difficulties. Equally, however, and even amongst responses that were positive about the academy, there
p.7
Leadership and management
were parents and carers who were keen to improve the quality of the dialogue they have with the academy, so that they become better able to support their children’s learning. Amongst their comments, they pointed to variations in the marking of their children’s work that meant they were unable to help the students respond, a lack of information at appropriate times to enable them to understand their children’s targets and to gauge their children’s progress in order to be able to provide support, and difficulties experienced in establishing a productive dialogue with the academy.
p.7
Leadership and management
Safeguarding checks are carried out and recorded carefully. The governing body ensures that it keeps safeguarding and health and safety policies and practice under regular review. The academy has in place the relevant policies and plans to promote equalities. These have led to some excellent examples of work with the students, for example in sociology lessons about gender issues and crime. The academy identifies individuals who are at risk of underachieving and provides good support. Also, it identifies variations between the attainment of different groups and has established a clear priority to reduce the differences.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.8
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6
p.8
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.
p.8
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).
p.8
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.
p.8
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.8
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add up exactly to 100.
p.8
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils' punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils' freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.9
to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main
findings from the inspection of their school.
p.10
Inspection of Abbey Grange Church of England Academy, Leeds, LS16 5EA
Thank you for talking to my colleagues and me and making us welcome when we visited your academy recently. The inspectors spoke with you, looked at your work, read the results of questionnaires filled in by you, the staff and your parents and carers, and spoke with some of your teachers. Here is a brief summary of the main findings, which I hope will be of interest to you.
p.10
Inspection of Abbey Grange Church of England Academy, Leeds, LS16 5EA
Abbey Grange provides you with a good education. It is improving well all the time. This is also true of the sixth form. You make good progress overall from your starting points when you join the academy. Your attainment is high and it is improving well and faster than nationally. Your attendance is high. That is very commendable. Your behaviour is good. The inspectors took note of the way you get on so well together and of how you respond to the teachers well, how you conduct yourselves around the academy. You get much enjoyment from learning and find lessons interesting. The quality of the teaching is good and those of you who need extra help are supported very well. Your social, moral, spiritual, and cultural development is excellent. It is reflected in many aspects of your work, your behaviour, and the relationships you establish in and out of school.
p.10
Inspection of Abbey Grange Church of England Academy, Leeds, LS16 5EA
I have asked the staff and the governing body to make sure that there are even more opportunities for you to take the initiative in lessons and exercise responsibility for your own learning, including through the marking of your work and the feedback you are given. I have asked the school also to add to the ways in which it works with your parents and carers, so that they are fully able to give you the support that they want to.
p.10
Inspection of Abbey Grange Church of England Academy, Leeds, LS16 5EA
Yours sincerely, Clive Moss Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion