Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

St Ursula's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 8 Feb 2012 · published 5 Mar 2012 · URN 102332

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Gavin Jones, Kewal Goel

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School

  • URN verified

    102332

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveexemplaryoutstandingeffectivelyhighly effectivesuccessfulexceptionallyextremely
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateinconsistentinconsistencygapsnot yetnot successfulnot improved

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1759w+68
  • Leadership411w+39
  • What needs to improve140w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,301
shorter than usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 7–11 Inspection date(s) 7–8 February 2012 Inspection number 376698 St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 102332 Local authority Havering Inspection number 376698 Inspection dates 7–8 February 2012 Lead inspector Gavin Jones

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Junior School category Community Age range of pupils 7−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 239 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Dermot O’Connor Headteacher Clare D’Netto Date of previous school inspection 15 October 2008 School address Straight Road Romford

p.1

RM3 7JS Telephone number 01708 343170 Fax number 01708 379590 Email address office@st-ursulas-rc-jun.havering.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.1

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They visited 15 lessons and observed 10 teachers over a total of almost seven hours. This included four joint observations carried out with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. Inspectors held meetings with members of the governing body, staff and groups of pupils. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at policies, pupils’ books, safeguarding records and evidence of the monitoring of teaching and learning. The team examined 65 questionnaires from parents and carers, 98 from pupils and 19 from staff.

p.3

Information about the school

St Ursula’s is similar to the average sized primary school. Almost half of the pupils come from minority ethnic groups with the largest being those of Black African heritage. A third of pupils, an above average proportion, speak English as an additional language, with a small number being new to learning English, and this figure is rising. There are 23 languages spoken in the school. The proportion of pupils who are disabled and those who have special educational needs is higher than the national average; a significant number of these pupils have speech and language difficulties and/or behavioural problems. A small number have multiple learning difficulties. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is broadly average.

p.3

Information about the school

The school meets the current floor standard, whereby the government sets the minimum expectations for attainment and progress. The school has successfully gained the Eco-School and Healthy Schools awards. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school. It has consolidated its position since the last inspection when it was also judged to be good. All but one parent/carer, who completed the questionnaire, said they would recommend it to others.  Pupils’ achievement is good. Their attainment is above average in English and mathematics and their progress is good. Achievement in mathematics is particularly strong as a result of many improvements made by the school. Achievement, in writing, for a small group of more able pupils, particularly girls, is not as high as it should be.  Teaching is good, although some satisfactory teaching remains. Teachers have high expectations and good subject knowledge. Tasks are generally matched well to the needs of different abilities of learners. The teaching of mathematics is very successful and this has accelerated pupils’ progress.  Teachers’ marking is inconsistent. While there are pockets of good practice,

p.4

Key findings

marking does not always identify the next steps pupils need to take. There is also an inconsistency in the use made of additional adults in lessons.  Leadership and management are good. The new headteacher, ably supported by the deputy headteacher, provides strong leadership. A number of significant initiatives have been put in place and the outcomes of these are very positive. As one parent wrote, ‘There has been a huge improvement in the school since the arrival of the new headteacher…it is reflected in the positive mood of the children.’  The behaviour and attitudes of pupils are good and in some cases exemplary. The school is viewed by well over 90% of pupils, parents and carers as a safe place, where behaviour has improved. They say that bullying rarely occurs and is dealt with swiftly whenever it is seen.  The curriculum for the key subjects of English, mathematics, science and information and communication technology is well matched to pupils’ needs and

p.4

Key findings

supports good progress. The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, social, moral and cultural development extremely well.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Accelerate the progress of all groups of pupils in writing, but especially for more able pupils, particularly girls, in order that more reach the higher Level 5 at the end of Year 6 by July 2013 by:  developing the English curriculum and the teaching of writing in particular to be more effective in challenging more-able pupils  ensuring that the monitoring and evaluation of leaders in English lead to improvement in the teaching of writing.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the teaching and learning coaching programme so that all teaching is good, with at least half outstanding by spring term 2013 by:  ensuring that it is rigorously monitored by leaders  ensuring that teachers deploy additional adults more effectively so that they model the work of the class teacher  sharpening marking which clarifies for pupils how they can improve.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils enter the school with broadly average attainment. Virtually all groups of pupils make good progress over time. By the time they reach the end of Year 6 their attainment is above average and they do particularly well in mathematics. There is very little variation in the achievement of different groups of pupils, as the school has been particularly successful in narrowing any gaps which existed between groups and national averages. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs do as well as their peers, because staff make suitable adjustments to materials and activities so that they match pupils’ needs. High levels of staffing enable pupils of varying abilities to make good progress, as a result of highly effective levels of care and one-to-one support they receive from teaching assistants. Especially successful, is the work of the home-school learning support mentor. However, a small group of

p.5

Achievement of pupils

more able girls do not always reach their fullest potential in writing.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The slight dip in standards, in 2010 in mathematics, has been very effectively tackled by the school, giving rise to the highest levels of attainment in several years in 2011. Although pupils’ attainment in English is only slightly behind that in mathematics, the school has not been slow, under the leadership of the new literacy leader, in examining how improvements might be made in order to ensure that more-able pupils, in particular, are challenged.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils enjoy reading and have developed the necessary skills to read accurately for sustained periods. By the time pupils leave, standards of reading are above average. This is because guided reading lessons and phonic work (the teaching of letters and the sounds they make) encourage and extend independent reading skills, with pupils using their phonic knowledge as a first strategy for word recognition. Where pupils need additional help with phonic work, teachers revisit and consolidate earlier learning demonstrating clearly how to blend sounds and also how to segment words to support spelling.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils show excellent attitudes to learning. They are keen to do well for their teachers and themselves. They share learning with their classmates and give each other support. In a Year 6 literacy lesson, for example, pupils were quick in volunteering to write emotive words and phrases on the whiteboard as a precursor to writing an evacuee’s diary. Pupils have their own targets for literacy and numeracy and most know them well. An appropriate emphasis on learning objectives helps pupils to understand what they will be learning, while understanding success criteria helps many to gauge how well they are achieving. Almost all parents and carers felt that the school helped their children develop skills in communication, reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils agree and this view is also supported by the inspection evidence.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching is typically good over time and sometimes better, leading to pupils’ achieving well. Nevertheless, there are still some pockets of satisfactory teaching.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The planned curriculum helps teachers prepare well, taking into account the varying abilities of pupils, so that they can all be challenged appropriately. However, occasionally, more-able pupils, particularly girls, are not given sufficiently challenging work, especially in writing. The school is confident that its coaching programme to support teachers is beginning to have an improving effect on the quality of teaching. Nevertheless, the pace of improvement for this small group of teachers is not yet good enough.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching is characterised by good subject knowledge and positive relationships with pupils. Questioning is used well to help pupils think deeply and often used effectively to check their progress. In the best lessons, learning is effectively modelled by the teacher, so that pupils know precisely what to do and exactly what they will be learning. For example, in a Year 6 diary writing lesson, a wide range of techniques and strategies were used to interest and engage pupils in the theme. Discussions, photographs, real letters from the Second World War, and hot seating with pupils acting the parts of wartime children all made for exciting learning. As a result, all pupils made good progress in their learning. This curriculum project offered a variety of experiences that contributed well to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and enabled them to deepen their knowledge of social history and

p.6

Quality of teaching

In less successful lessons, additional adults are deployed ineffectively and teachers do not spend enough time explaining and modelling tasks, enabling pupils to start their work quickly and effectively. Marking does not always point to how improvements can be made.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The ways in which teachers promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development are successful. Literacy lessons on the highwayman and Second World War themes, for example, lead to pupils creating writing following opportunities for reflection. Both help pupils celebrate their cultural heritage. This is further extended in lessons where multicultural themes are highlighted.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Parents, carers, pupils and staff point to significant improvements in behaviour during this new school year. As one parent commented, reflecting the views of many, ‘The state of behaviour is now good’. During the inspection, behaviour, attitudes and enjoyment in lessons and around the school were good and sometimes exemplary. Relationships between pupils and staff are very positive and support learning well.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils clearly enjoy coming to school and attendance is above average. This is as a result of pupils being enthusiastic about school and parents and carers giving good support in ensuring they attend regularly. The very small number of pupils whose attendance is slightly lower or who are sometimes not punctual has been improved considerably due to the work of the home-school learning support mentor and daily checks on timekeeping.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils say that they feel extremely safe in school and this is echoed by their parents and carers. When discussing life in the school with pupils, they are very positive about work and behaviour. Pupils say that bullying is extremely rare and that all problems are dealt with very well. They expressed an exceptionally high level of confidence in staff. Parents and carers also reported that they too were confident that the school’s systems were sufficiently robust to deal with any incidents, should they occur. Inspection evidence fully supports the views of parents and carers.

p.7

Leadership and management

The leadership team is clearly driving school improvements. The new headteacher has instilled a passion and determination to achieve excellence. Staff questionnaires reflect a high degree of commitment. Post-holders at all levels have clear responsibilities, which they carry out with energy and professionalism. The teaching and coaching programme is helping to improve teaching supported by professional development.

p.7

Leadership and management

The governing body is currently undergoing changes to its structure in order to strengthen its strategies for holding leaders to account through monitoring and evaluation, which are underdeveloped. Safeguarding procedures are thorough. They are reviewed regularly and updated where appropriate. Child protection procedures are of good quality and well managed. Staff are well trained in first aid and safety procedures are firmly in place. The school rigorously implements strategies to tackle any forms of discrimination and offers pupils an inclusive learning environment. The school has good provision for community cohesion. It knows well the cultural, ethnic and religious backgrounds of its pupils and regularly involves them in a range of cultural events such as a multicultural week.

p.7

Leadership and management

The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Staff present very positive role models for pupils to emulate. This enables the pupils whose circumstances could make them vulnerable to overcome their difficulties and make significant changes to their attitudes and lives at school and at home. The school is already preparing to improve the effective curriculum. Currently, more-able pupils are not always fully challenged in writing and subjects are not always linked together as effectively as they might be. Pupils really enjoy the extended opportunities they have for first-hand learning through visits and over 90% of pupils now attend extra-curricular activities.

p.7

Leadership and management

Since the previous inspection, the school has improved behaviour, raised pupils’ performance, improved attendance markedly and sharpened the use of tracking to accelerate pupils’ progress. These successful actions demonstrate that leaders have good capacity to sustain further improvements.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School, Romford RM3 7JS

It was lovely to talk to so many of you when we visited your school this week in the snow. We judged that your school is good. You leave school with standards that are regularly above those of most children of your age. You make good progress in your work and achieve well. This is mainly because of good teaching and your good attitudes to your work.

p.11

Inspection of St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School, Romford RM3 7JS

You all say that you feel safe in school, in our discussions with you and in your response to the questionnaire. You confirm that behaviour is good. We found this to be the case in lessons, at playtime and lunchtime and your parents and carers agree with this view. All staff are very caring and take opportunities to help you achieve well not only in English and mathematics, but also in your personal development. You think deeply about issues in the world and are provided with many opportunities to develop spiritually. These are some of the reasons why you attend school so regularly, because you enjoy school so much.

p.11

Inspection of St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School, Romford RM3 7JS

I have asked the school to do two things to make it even better by:

p.11

Inspection of St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School, Romford RM3 7JS

 helping you to accelerate your progress in writing, particularly for the more-able girls  ensuring that your teachers are helped to make more of your lessons outstanding.

p.11

Inspection of St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School, Romford RM3 7JS

All of you can help by maintaining the good behaviour we saw on our visit and by making sure you attend regularly.

p.11

Inspection of St Ursula’s Catholic Junior School, Romford RM3 7JS

Gavin Jones Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion