Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Bidbury Junior School

Inspected 9 Feb 2012 · published 5 Mar 2012 · URN 116053

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Keith Sadler (lead), Janet Watson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Janet Watson, Keith Sadler

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Bidbury Junior School

  • URN verified

    116053

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetySatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 22% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingsuccessfulstrongimprovingimprovedgood progresssuccessfullypositive
Criticisminadequateinconsistenciespoorweakslownot yetbelowfalling behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1815w+6
  • Leadership495w+52
  • What needs to improve81w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,373
shorter than usual (typical 3005)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 44
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 3
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Age group 7–11 Inspection date(s) 8–9 February 2012 Inspection number 379192 Bidbury Junior School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 116053 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 379192 Inspection dates 8–9 February 2012 Lead inspector Keith Sadler

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Junior School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 179 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jacque Cook Headteacher Julie Wood Date of previous school inspection 17–18 June 2009 School address Fraser Road Bedhampton Havant PO9 3EF Telephone number 02392 474513 Fax number 02392 470430 Email address lorraine.hansell@bidbury-jun.hants.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Inspectors observed 16 lessons led by 10 different teachers or practitioners. The inspectors held meetings with members of the governing body, staff, parents and carers, and groups of pupils. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work and looked at a wide range of documentation. This included: the school’s analysis of pupils’ progress; teachers’ lesson plans; the school development plan; leaders’ monitoring records; and pupils’ work. Questionnaires completed by 100 parents and carers together with those from staff and from pupils in Key Stage 2 were analysed and their responses taken into account.

p.3

Information about the school

Bidbury Junior is a below average sized school. Most of the pupils live in the immediate vicinity. Most pupils are of White British heritage and there are a few from minority ethnic backgrounds. Very few pupils speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is average. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is above average. Many of these pupils have social and emotional difficulties. The school meets the current floor standard. There is a breakfast club which is managed by the governing body and is included in this inspection. In addition, there is an after-school club which is not managed by the governing body and is subject to a separate inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a satisfactory school. It is improving rapidly because senior leaders’ and governors’ commitment to improvement is shared by the staff.  Achievement is satisfactory and improving. In English, pupils make satisfactory progress to attain standards that are in line with the national average. In writing, previous underachievement is being eliminated; even so, progress is hampered by poor handwriting and restrictions in pupils’ use of grammar and punctuation. In mathematics progress is accelerating, though pupils’ mental calculation skills are below average.  Even though teaching has improved recently and much is now of good quality, scrutiny of pupils’ work and school data show that, over time, teaching is satisfactory. Teachers generally provide interesting activities that capture the pupils’ interest. Even though most lessons are planned well to meet the varying learning needs of the pupils, in some there is too little challenge for the more

p.4

Key findings

able. There is some good practice in the use of assessment, although there are inconsistencies in teachers’ marking of work.  Parents and carers are overwhelmingly supportive and are almost unanimous in the view that their children feel safe in school. However, a small minority say that lessons are disrupted by bad behaviour. Inspection evidence shows that behaviour is satisfactory overall and recent improvements mean that pupils’ behaviour, both in lessons and around school is often good.  The headteacher, senior staff and governors have worked with some success to strengthen teaching and learning since the last inspection, but they are aware that more needs to be done to raise achievement. All staff with responsibilities make a good contribution to the school’s effective monitoring and evaluation processes.

p.4

Key findings

Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Accelerate progress in writing and mathematics by:  improving pupils’ handwriting and presentation skills  extending pupils’ grammar and punctuation, particularly for middle ability pupils  strengthening mental calculation skills.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By January 2013, improve the quality of teaching by:  removing inconsistencies in teachers’ marking of pupils’ work, particularly in making the next steps in learning clear  strengthening teachers’ planning by making sure that activities are more consistently matched to pupils’ learning needs, particularly for the more able.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Almost all parents and carers who returned questionnaires said that their children were making good progress. Inspection findings indicate that, over time, achievement is satisfactory. However, there is evidence of recent improvement and, in many of the lessons seen during the inspection, pupils made good progress. Pupils’ attainment on entry into Year 3 is broadly average. In the past, their achievement has been patchy; this has led to variable standards at the end of Year 6. In mathematics, for example, pupils are now attaining expected levels, though standards were below average in the 2011 tests. Currently, pupils’ weak mental calculation skills, even for the most able, slow their learning. In English, standards are average. Good achievement in reading is characterised by pupils’ good knowledge of letters and sounds. Standards in reading are above average by the end of Year 6. Pupils in Year 6 enjoy reading a good range of novels and more able

p.5

Achievement of pupils

pupils successfully explain their preferences, comparing and contrasting authors such as Roald Dahl and J. K. Rowling. In writing, there has been a successful focus on improving achievement from some previously slow progress. A successful system of individual and small group support and close attention being paid to those in danger of falling behind is resulting in all groups now making at least satisfactory progress. This was evident in a Year 6 lesson in which pupils were successfully re-drafting a newspaper article as a radio report. Peer analysis was used well and pupils discussed the merits of others’ work. Even so, the progress of some pupils is restricted because their use of grammar and punctuation is relatively limited. The good focus on increasing opportunities for writing across the curriculum aids pupils’ progress. Year 3 pupils, for example, produced some good quality historical report writing following

p.5

Achievement of pupils

a visit to Highclere Castle. Even so, across all year groups, pupils’ relatively weak handwriting skills hamper their extended writing because for some it remains a laborious activity. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The attainment of boys and girls is similar. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make the same progress as others because of the support they receive. Similarly, more able pupils make satisfactory progress, although the proportion of pupils gaining the higher levels at the end of Year 6 has been below average. However, initiatives such as an after-school club for higher ability pupils in mathematics and the close grouping of pupils in English are starting to pay dividends and more pupils are currently attaining at higher levels in both Year 5 and Year 6. Pupils say that they enjoy learning. As one Year 6 pupil said, ‘Our teachers get in there straight away and we like that, as we learn quickly.’

p.6

Quality of teaching

Parents and carers hold very positive views on the quality of teaching their children receive. Pupils are now making greater progress because teaching has improved recently. Teaching is making a significant contribution to the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. For example, pupils’ social development, particularly of their interpersonal skills, is supported well by the many opportunities that teachers provide for them to work in pairs and small groups. However, scrutiny of pupils’ work and of the school’s comprehensive data shows that over time, although improving rapidly, teaching is satisfactory overall. Teachers manage pupils well. The impact of the planned curriculum is evident in improving progress. They use their knowledge of subjects well and illustrate key teaching points confidently, making good use of new technologies. In most lessons, teachers question pupils incisively and move learning

p.6

Quality of teaching

on at a brisk pace. For example, in a Year 5 mathematics lesson when pupils were calculating the cost of items, the teacher was able to extend the pupils’ learning with probing questioning which elicited the extent of the pupils’ understanding.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teachers’ assessments are becoming more accurate and the information is used increasingly well to plan lessons that meet the needs of all groups of pupils. However, this is not yet fully consistent and, on occasion, work is too easy, particularly for the more able. Marking is often of good quality and is comprehensive and supportive. However, there are inconsistencies because teachers do not always ensure that next steps in learning are made clear to pupils.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Almost all pupils said that they feel safe in school because ‘all the adults help us’. This is confirmed by parents and carers, who were almost unanimous in saying that their children are safe. Parents and carers have less positive views about behaviour, with a number making comments regarding how poor behaviour interferes with their children’s learning. However, improvements mean that behaviour is currently good or better in almost all lessons and also around the school. This results from a well- defined and coherent behaviour policy which pupils understand and respect. This policy is successful in that behaviour has improved and the school has reduced the number of exclusions. Staff manage pupils well and relationships in classrooms are good. As one Year 6 pupil said, ‘Some children have an anger problem but it is dealt with really well by our teachers.’ Those with social and emotional difficulties are

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

managed well, and the good and wide-ranging programme of high quality support enables these pupils to play a full part in lessons. There is a good quality personal and social development programme. This ensures that pupils are helped to be aware of the various risks they face in and out of school, such as when using the internet or when walking and cycling, and how to respond to these. Pupils are aware of different types of bullying, including cyber bullying, and know how to deal with these. They are particularly appreciative of the opportunity to report any distress that they may feel by using the effective website that enables them to report any concerns. Good levels of pastoral care ensure that there is sensitive support for pupils and families whose challenging circumstances may make them vulnerable. A number of parents and carers made appreciative comments about how the school has helped them

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

through times of difficulty. Others commented on how the good quality breakfast club is enjoyed by their children, and this was confirmed by the inspection.

p.7

Leadership and management

The overall impact of leadership and management on pupils’ progress is satisfactory. However, with the support of the local authority, there has been a significant improvement. There is a clear commitment to improvement that is shared by all the staff and governors. Teamwork is strong and many staff commented on how proud they are to be a member of the Bidbury team. Discrimination of any kind is not tolerated and the promotion of equality is good, and demonstrated by the close attention that is paid to ensuring that all pupils are able to access all the school has to offer. Information from good quality monitoring procedures enables staff and governors to check the impact of innovations such as the recent move to school-wide grammar and punctuation sessions, which are starting to have a positive impact on achievement in writing. In addition, good quality evaluation reports relating to teaching are used well to determine professional development requirements for

p.7

Leadership and management

members of staff. Monitoring information is used well to inform the strategic plan which is a good tool for development. However, the school has a too-generous view of its own effectiveness.

p.7

Leadership and management

Senior leaders have rightly focused on strengthening literacy and numeracy and this has resulted in good quality curricular provision in these basic skills. Staff are now turning their attention to ensuring that the quality of the whole curriculum is lifted to good levels by increasingly linking subjects together and refining the themes being taught. The wide range of extra-curricular activities successfully complements the whole curriculum in effectively supporting pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, with many parents and carers commenting on the good range of musical activities available to their children.

p.7

Leadership and management

The governing body provides strong strategic leadership. Under the excellent leadership of the chair, successful systems have been developed to check and evaluate the success of the school’s plans. Close attention is paid to ensuring safeguarding arrangements are robust and meet regulatory requirements.

p.7

Leadership and management

Even though the impact of leadership and management has not yet fully translated Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

into securing good achievement for pupils, the strong improvements in teaching and learning, linked to the successful systems to monitor and evaluate the work of the school, demonstrate a sound capacity for securing further improvement.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were intr oduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Bidbury Junior School, Havant PO9 3EF

I am writing to thank you for your help when we came to visit your school and also to tell you what we found. We enjoyed our visit and I particularly enjoyed listening to your singing practice. I thought you sang beautifully and we can understand why you are proud of your choir!

p.11

Inspection of Bidbury Junior School, Havant PO9 3EF

Yours is a satisfactory school, which means that some things are done well and other things could be improved. You told us that you enjoy school. Even though many of you said that behaviour is not good in your school, it was good in all the lessons that we saw. You have positive attitudes that help you in your learning. Your parents and carers told us that you are happy and feel safe, and we agree with them. Your teachers try hard to make lessons interesting for you, and most lessons are good and you now learn well. But in some lessons, the work is too easy for you, particularly those of you that find learning easy, and this means that you do not achieve as well as you could. You told us that you enjoy all the trips and visits that you make. These things help to make sure that you enjoy learning. The staff look after you well and take good care of you.

p.11

Inspection of Bidbury Junior School, Havant PO9 3EF

We have asked your headteacher and staff to take some action to make sure that improvements continue. We have asked them to make two particular improvements in lessons. First, to make sure that your teachers give you work that challenges you, particularly for those of you that find learning easy. Second, we have asked that when they mark your work, teachers make sure that the next steps in your learning are made clear for you. We have also asked that in English, your handwriting improves and also your grammar and punctuation. In mathematics, we have asked that your teachers make sure that your calculation skills are improved. You can help by making sure that you practise your tables and also you work hard to make sure that your handwriting is neat.

p.11

Inspection of Bidbury Junior School, Havant PO9 3EF

We hope that you continue to enjoy school and learning.

p.11

Inspection of Bidbury Junior School, Havant PO9 3EF

Keith Sadler Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion