Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Karen Adriaanse

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Karen Adriaanse

  • Postcode verified

    L2 2DH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−21Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismlacksnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings468w−21
  • What needs to improve152w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
609
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 25%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms A English Acting Head of Adult Learning Liverpool City Council Municipal Buildings Dale Street Liverpool L2 2DH

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visits on 8 and 9 November 2011 and 21 February 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, participants, and partners; visits to three learning centres; scrutiny of relevant documents; and observation of six learning sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 Meeting the needs of unemployed people is a key strategic priority for Liverpool City Council and the Adult Learning Service uses its funding flexibly to provide programmes and support for people on benefits. Staff are using their prior experience in putting on short vocational programmes well to offer short sector-specific programmes to the unemployed. However, its provision specifically for people on benefits who speak English as an additional language has long waiting lists and does not focus enough on helping learners progress to work or vocational training.  The service works well with employers and other partners to plan and design good work-related pre-employment programmes. The trainers have relevant occupational expertise and they support participants well to help them develop a good understanding of their industry or area of work and the employability skills they need to develop to meet employers’

p.1

Key findings

requirements. Job outcomes are good.  Since the first visit, the provision in English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) has an increased focus on identifying participants’ barriers to employment and helping them develop work-related language skills. The service has just started to provide an initial information, advice and guidance session for all participants assessed at entry level 2 or above. The staff involved have good expertise in providing this support to people from minority ethnic groups. However, the participants interviewed were not fully clear about their next step after they have completed their twelve-week programme.  Staff have good skills in teaching ESOL and in the sessions observed, they set and achieved high standards in developing participants’ accuracy in grammar and pronunciation. The participants interviewed had increased their confidence, especially in speaking and listening. The provision now

p.2

Key findings

focuses better on developing work-related language skills but it still lacks opportunities for participants to develop functional language skills and employability skills in vocational contexts.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 continuing to develop the ESOL provision, including through further work with employers, to ensure that it enables participants to develop language skills that directly support their development of employability and vocational skills  reducing waiting lists by ensuring that learning programmes are time bound for more participants so that they can progress to further training programmes, where realistic  increasing the information, advice and guidance participants receive to help them focus on identifying specific opportunities for progression to vocational training, voluntary or paid work to support their development of employability and language skills.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Liverpool City Council.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion