Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Karen Adriaanse

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Karen Adriaanse

  • Postcode verified

    E6 6ER

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+2Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyclear
Criticismslownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings441w+2
  • What needs to improve167w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
601
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 27%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms D Brown-Sackey Principal Newham College of Further Education East Ham Campus High Street South London E6 6ER

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on 24 and 25 January 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, participants, and partners; scrutiny of relevant documents; and observation of five sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 The college has built on its significant expertise and experience in providing employability programmes to develop this provision further in 10 vocational areas. However, implementation of employability provision funded through the Skills Funding Agency since August 2011 has been slow. Very few participants have joined many of the short courses developed specifically for people on benefits referred through Jobcentre Plus.  Staff promote equality and diversity very effectively through employability training. In the sessions observed, participants developed a good understanding of equality of opportunity at work. Inclusivity was also a high priority in the session plans and schemes of work reviewed. However, in the vocational training sessions observed, staff lacked sufficient language, literacy and numeracy awareness to embed these skills in their teaching to help increase participants’ overall employability skills.

p.1

Key findings

 Participants joining the college’s job brokerage scheme develop good jobsearch skills. They receive good individual support and realistic advice and guidance when completing job applications and preparing for interviews. However, the college does not use initial assessments adequately to identify the personal barriers to employment of participants referred through Jobcentre Plus or their training needs to improve their employability skills. The participants interviewed did not have a clear idea of their development needs to increase their employability and very few of them had clear employment goals.  Teaching staff involved in the employability provision have good expertise in teaching, with good industrial knowledge and experience. Attainment was good in the sessions observed, and the participants gained useful knowledge that helped them complete the written assessment packs required for the qualification. However, assessment practices were too

p.2

Key findings

narrow and did not focus enough on assessing participants’ development of the practical skills required to work in the relevant industry.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing further the links with Jobcentre Plus to enable the college to implement its plans to offer short employability courses in the context of 10 vocational areas, including the specialist courses for those who speak English as an additional language  implementing and using careers guidance and initial assessments to identify participants’ personal barriers to work, their employability, literacy, numeracy and language skills to ensure that training programmes focus on meeting participants’ training needs and employment goals  reviewing assessment practices to ensure that assessments provide participants with constructive feedback on their development of the practical skills they need to increase their chances of sustained employment.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Newham College of Further Education.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion