Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Rodgers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Rodgers

  • Postcode verified

    PO19 1SB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery effectivevery wellmake good progresseffectivelyimproving
Criticismunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings462w+63
  • What needs to improve126w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Legrave Principal Chichester College Westgate Fields Chichester West Sussex PO19 1SB

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on 20 and 21 February to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, participants and partners; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of participants’ work; and observation of three learning sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 Since August 2011, Chichester College has developed its employability programme very well by re-training tutors, establishing provision in Worthing and introducing a good range of regularly run short courses. College managers tailor courses very effectively and quickly in response to requests from Jobcentre Plus and employers who are new to the area. The relationships with Jobcentre Plus have been strengthened and although referrals have increased significantly, the proportion of participants who start courses varies between learning centres and courses.  Tutors use comprehensive initial assessments and interviews to discuss participants’ barriers to employment, and to identify their development needs and career or employment goals. However, participants do not have individual development plans that record these discussions or the agreed actions to help increase their chances of employment.  The teaching and learning observed were very effective in increasing

p.1

Key findings

participants’ confidence and communication and teamwork skills. Participants developed and demonstrated sound vocational skills and a good awareness of health and safety through practical learning activities. In jobsearch and employability sessions, participants used good-quality learning resources to develop relevant skills, such as improving the professional appearance and language in their curriculum vitae and covering letters.  Participants receive highly individualised and valued support. They make good progress towards achieving their vocational and employability qualifications. They receive regular, thorough and motivational feedback on their work, which some participants on the construction course particularly appreciated as they had not previously had the opportunity to have their skills assessed.  Tutors have good links with employers which they use well to enrich the courses by bringing industry relevance to vocational subjects through

p.2

Key findings

guest speakers, external visits and creating realistic work environments for learning. However, the college does not introduce information, advice and guidance about career and progression options sufficiently early in each course and some participants are unclear about what they will do next.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 devising individual development plans with each participant that identify their barriers to employment and set appropriate goals  incorporating more structured advice and guidance about career and education progression, including to apprenticeships and work experience, within each course  increasing the proportion of participants who start courses following referral by Jobcentre Plus through analysing the reasons for the variations in courses and learning centres and taking appropriate action.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Chichester College.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion