Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School

Inspected 8 Feb 2012 · published 2 Mar 2012 · URN 118199

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Michael Pye

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    118199

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progresseffectivepositiveeffectivelyexcellenthighly effectivesafe
Criticisminadequateinconsistenciesweaknessesweakernot consistentlyinsufficientlygapsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1781w+50
  • Leadership680w+39
  • What needs to improve109w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,555
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 7–8 February 2012 Inspection number 379562 St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 118199 Local authority Isle of Wight Inspection number 379562 Inspection dates 7–8 February 2012 Lead inspector Michael Pye

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 135 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Father A Glaysher Headteacher Jo Anderson Date of previous school inspection 30 September–1 October 2008 School address High Street Carisbrooke Newport PO30 1NR Telephone number 01983 522747 Fax number 01983 521050 Email address stocprimary@tiscali.co.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspector observed seven lessons including those involving linking sounds and letters. He also heard pupils read. A total of six teachers were seen. The inspector spoke to parents and carers and held meetings with members of the governing body, pupils and staff. The inspector took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s and pupils’ work and looked at data relating to pupils’ attainment and progress. The school’s development plan, lesson and curriculum plans, governing body documentation and school policies and procedures, particularly those relating to the health and safety and safeguarding of pupils, were scrutinised. The inspector looked at 39 questionnaires completed by parents and carers as well as those returned by staff and pupils.

p.3

Information about the school

Pupils in this smaller-than-average-sized primary school come from a predominantly White British background. The largest minority ethnic group consists of pupils from Any Other White background. The proportion of pupils who are disabled or have special educational needs is currently above average. The main group consists of pupils with speech, language and communication difficulties. Currently, the number of pupils with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below average. Early Years Foundation Stage provision is made for the children in the Reception class. A breakfast and after-school club, managed by the governing body, is situated on the school site. The school has been nationally recognised through gaining the enhanced Healthy Schools award .

p.3

Information about the school

The school is federated with another Roman Catholic primary school on the island. After school reorganisation on the island, St Thomas of Canterbury School now has its first Year 6 class. Consequently, there are no current national published data by which the school’s performance can be compared against national floor standards. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school. Pupils achieve well and enjoy their lessons.  Pupils, including those who are disabled and those who have special educational needs , make good progress throughout the school, including in the Early Years Foundation Stage.  Pupils attain above average standards in writing, reading and mathematics. Boys generally have lower levels of literacy on entry to the school, and although they too reach above average standards in writing, they are not as far ahead as the girls.  The quality of teaching is good. Teachers plan a wide range of activities that meet the different learning styles of pupils. Nevertheless, some inconsistencies exist between teachers. Not all teachers use questioning to revisit and challenge pupils at a more difficult level or use assessment data to plan learning that challenges pupils of different abilities. Also, the use of short consolidation periods during lessons to ascertain the extent of pupils’ understanding is not

p.4

Key findings

used consistently.  Pupils’ behaviour is good. Pupils feel very safe and have very positive attitudes to learning.  Leadership and management are good. The caring, Christian-based ethos has been effectively combined with high expectations of pupils’ academic work. There are particular strengths at the senior level and in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Some inconsistencies exist between subject leaders in the degree to which they use challenging success criteria against which progress can be measured in their development plans for improving pupils’ academic performance.  Governors act as a critical friend to the school because they monitor the work of the school well, for example through regular visiting. While they speak to pupils this is not done on a formal basis and hence opportunities are lost to explore their views in more depth. Their ability to raise questions is not maximised because they have not received focused training in the interpretation of

p.4

Key findings

assessment data. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment in writing, particularly for boys, by ensuring that all teachers: - use regular consolidation periods during lessons to identify any gaps in learning - consistently use assessment data to plan work that challenges pupils of different abilities - use questioning techniques that consistently challenge all pupils.  Maximise the impact of leaders and managers on school improvement by: - making sure subject leaders use challenging criteria in their development plans against which success can be measured - ensuring that governors receive focused training in understanding assessment data - governors arranging formal meetings with pupils so as to ascertain their views on a range of school issues.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The levels of skills and knowledge of children entering Reception vary from year to year. Occasionally they meet age-related expectations but at other times, such as with the current cohort, are below the expected levels. There is, however, a consistent picture across the years of weaknesses on entry in aspects of literacy and numeracy. The children achieve well overall in the Early Years Foundation Stage and make good progress in areas such as linking sounds and letters. They leave Reception with the majority having met or exceeded their early learning goals, although writing, especially for boys, is the weaker element. As pupils progress up through the school, the gap between boys and girls is closing as the curriculum gives good opportunities for pupils to practise their writing skills across different subjects.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

All pupils, including the small number from minority ethnic groups, make good progress. The vast majority of parents or carers who returned the questionnaire also agree that this is so. In the 2011 end of Year 2 assessments, attainment was above the national average in reading, writing and mathematics. Those pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, also attained above the national average and make good strides in their learning.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The school has successfully managed the transition to an all-through primary and the older pupils in school achieve well. Work seen in the current Year 6 is of a standard which is generally above the national average, in English and mathematics. Reading standards are also above average when pupils leave the school.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Younger pupils are confident when reading and they dismantle or segment individual sounds in words well. One boy identified the inspector by sounding out ‘O’ ‘f’ ‘s’ ‘t’ ‘e’ Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

‘d’ prior to pronouncing the whole word with confidence. Pupils talk about their favourite authors. ‘Roald Dahl is fun,’ and, ‘Enid Blyton’s stories are exciting.’ Reception children link sounds to letters correctly and identify words such as ‘jam’. In Year 1 they ask questions willingly of an ‘alternative’ Goldilocks prior to taking the ‘hot seat’ themselves. They show great respect for the views of others. Older pupils write increasingly complex sentences about character and setting, for example when writing at length a fantasy story based around ‘The Dump’. These pupils are also answering more difficult word problems in mathematics. Pupils say they enjoy school. This can be seen in the positive way they approach their work. It can also be seen in their relaxed and happy response to the varied activities provided in the breakfast and after-school clubs.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The vast majority of parents or carers returning the questionnaire believe that teaching is good. The inspector agrees with this. The curriculum is well planned and this enables pupils across the school to gain knowledge and skills at a good rate. In Reception, the children benefit from good teaching about linking sounds and letters because of the strong subject knowledge of the teacher. Elsewhere in school, very strong relationships in lessons result in pupils willing to engage with their learning. However, teachers do not consistently use their secure subject knowledge to revisit pupils’ learning in lessons or to further question and challenge their understanding. A very effective lesson for older pupils saw different ability groups being challenged well because of the good use being made of test and assessment data to match tasks closely to pupils’ abilities. As a result, progress was rapid and pupils were

p.6

Quality of teaching

engaged throughout. However, these approaches are not yet embedded across the school. Pupils’ motivation for learning is often boosted by the good use of computers and interactive whiteboards. Basic skills are well reinforced in classrooms through vocabulary lists and the use of dictionaries. Good verbal feedback from teachers helps ensure that pupils know how to improve their work. Teachers’ marking provides clear pointers for improvement and most, but not all, pupils respond positively to the guidance given.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching makes an important contribution to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Many opportunities are provided for pupils to collaborate together, to explore moral and social issues in lessons and to learn about different faiths and cultures through visits and visitors. Activities such as these contribute to the quality of learning, summed up by one parent and echoed by others, ‘I am impressed with the excellent learning environment. My boys have found it deeply caring while challenging, fun and exciting.’

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils state that the school is friendly and a safe place to be. Inspection findings confirm this. The school reinforces the ‘keep safe’ messages through road safety and ‘stranger-danger’ sessions and the promotion of safety in lessons. Pupils have a Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

good, clear idea of what constitutes bullying. They mention computers and explain that they are kept safe because the school blocks anything ‘nasty’. One pupil said, ‘This is a non-bullying school.’ Pupils state that the school deals with any incidents quickly and effectively. All parents who returned the questionnaire believe their children are safe. Behaviour in class and around the school is good and discussions with pupils indicate that this is the norm. Pupils are keen and enthusiastic learners and their enjoyment of school is reflected by their above average attendance. The school is focusing more upon the small minority of pupils whose parents do not ensure that they arrive on time for school every day.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The pupils make a telling contribution to creating an atmosphere conducive to learning. Pupils are polite and courteous and show respect to adults and classmates. They have respect for the views and beliefs of others and show their readiness to contribute to the life of the school as a community by taking responsibility for their actions and behaviour and by carrying out roles such as prefects, house captains and head boy and girl with great maturity and enjoyment.

p.7

Leadership and management

Improvement since the last inspection has been good . The curriculum promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well; parents from minority ethnic backgrounds are invited into school to talk to pupils about their experiences and pupils benefit from visits to places of cultural interest and diversity. The effective manner in which leaders of the school ensure that the curriculum is well matched to pupils’ needs has resulted in improvements in writing for both boys and girls and although girls are further ahead the gap is narrowing. Literacy and numeracy links are well reinforced across the curriculum, with boys being attracted to writing through the use of topics that reflect their interests. Speaking and listening opportunities are planned regularly and demanding texts challenge the pupils. Pupils’ high respect and tolerance for others are the result of the established ethos within

p.7

Leadership and management

the school, based around the effective promotion of equality and non discrimination. The school is successful in dismantling barriers to learning experienced by pupils who find school life difficult through well-planned intervention strategies and the utilisation of outside support agencies. As one parent wrote, ‘The school makes every child feel part of the ‘family’ created here regardless of ability, background and religion.’

p.7

Leadership and management

Senior leaders have shared effectively the vision for improvement. More distributive leadership means this vision is reinforced by wider numbers of accountable leaders. Subject leaders are developing their skills and are involved in monitoring, evaluation and development planning. This has led, for example, to the promotion of ‘thinking skills’ and problem-solving approaches in mathematics lessons. However, there are inconsistencies in the use of measurable and challenging success criteria when action planning to improve pupils’ academic performance. School leaders are benefiting from the developing links with a partner school and sharing good practice. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

The experienced headteacher has led improvements in teaching through a focused programme of lesson observations and valuable feedback to teachers. She has also made good use of pupil tracking data and analysis to monitor and improve progress. In Reception very detailed analysis of entry and on-going levels is allowing the school to more accurately identify children’s progress rates. Such aspects, together with improved writing standards, sustained good progress and the good behaviour and above average attendance rates of pupils support the school’s good capacity to improve.

p.8

Leadership and management

Governors gain a good knowledge of the school through their visits and verbal reports from subject leaders. They regularly receive reports on aspects of safeguarding and health and safety. Appropriate recruitment checks on adults are carried out, child protection training is well embedded and an on-going check kept on the breakfast and after-school clubs. Safeguarding arrangements are secure. Governors raise questions and challenge the school when necessary, although their knowledge of how to interpret assessment data is insufficiently developed. During visits they miss opportunities to talk more formally with pupils to identify their views about school life. Communication with parents and carers, for example through an effective website and newsletters, is good. The great majority of those responding to the questionnaire agreed that they are kept well informed and expressed satisfaction with how the school is led and managed. Pupils also benefit from some well-

p.8

Leadership and management

established partnerships with the local schools. This has resulted in the sharing of good practice and effective transition arrangements being put into place for Year 6 when leaving the school.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

PO30 1NR

You may remember my recent visit. You were eager to tell me about your school and I listened carefully to what you told me. You told me yours is a good school, and I agree.

p.11

PO30 1NR

You progress well and this is the result of the good teaching you receive. You also told me that you really enjoy the projects that you are set, that lessons are ‘fun’ and that you enjoy school. Your above average attendance shows this! I saw that you use computers to help you learn. You told me that the teachers give you good guidance about how to further improve your work. While most of you are challenged by the work set, I have asked that all of your teachers plan work that ensures you all make good progress in lessons. You could help by telling them when you are finding the work too hard or too easy. I have also asked that they ensure that their questioning ensures that you have to think hard when answering.

p.11

PO30 1NR

I was very pleased to see that you behave well. You told me you feel safe and that if there are any incidents then you know the school will act to help you. You have very good opportunities to help with the running of the school and to take on responsibility. Well done to the prefects, house captains and your head girl and boy.

p.11

PO30 1NR

Your headteacher leads the school well and, like the other adults, wants things to improve even more. The school makes good plans for the future, but I have asked that all leaders make sure they can accurately see the improvements made by any changes they introduce. The governors have been asked to learn more about how to use the information they have on your work, and to talk to you more regularly about what you feel about school.

p.11

PO30 1NR

Thank you again and I wish you all the best for the future.

p.11

PO30 1NR

Michael Pye Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion