Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Aspris Children’s Services Limited in Herefordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
26 Jan 2012
- Inspectors verified
Philip Cass
- URN verified
SC402406
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 91
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC402406 Inspection date 26/01/2012 Inspector Philip Cass Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 02/06/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
This children's home is registered to provide care to up to three young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is owned by a private limited company.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
At the last inspection in June 2011, the overall effectiveness rating for the home was judged to be good. The home has made good progress since the last inspection. The experienced and capable staff team ensure that young people receive high quality care and have significantly improved life chances as a result of living at the home.
p.4
Progress
No requirements or recommendations were set at the last inspection. However, the management of the home have demonstrated a clear commitment to continual improvement. The home has a development plan that identifies specific areas for improvement. Quality of care is improved because the home has met or has made meaningful progress towards meeting these targets.
p.4
Progress
At the last inspection, it was noted that communication between staff and young people is of a high quality. The home has built on this strength to support young people to achieve well in education. Young people significantly improve education attendance and achieve to the best of their abilities. In recent months, young people have received awards as ‘most improved student’ and ‘student of the week’. Because the young people and staff interact positively, the home is a nurturing environment. Young people report that there is no bullying, and that the staff are helpful and very caring.
p.4
Progress
Since the last inspection, young people have made excellent progress. A social worker commented that progress made by young people has been: ‘quite miraculous’. Young people are protected from the risk of custodial sentence because they are supported to end patterns of offending behaviour. Young people develop improved social skills. As a result, they have increased confidence and significantly improved self-esteem. A young person reflected that his time at the home had been very positive. He stated that the home is: ‘the best place I have ever been in’.
p.4
Progress
The Regulation 33 quality assurance process is robust and focused on improvement. Where a weakness is identified, clear action plans are identified and the manager is quick to make improvements. The home has good communication with placing authorities and advocates effectively on behalf of the young people. The home produces clear and comprehensive placement plans that identify the individual needs of young people. However, the home is not sufficiently pro-active in contacting social workers to request that care plans be updated in line with the changing needs of the young people.
p.4
Progress
Young people benefit significantly from the provision of on-site therapy. A placements manager from a local authority stated that the: ‘therapy team is excellent’. The mental health and emotional resilience of young people is significantly improved because the care and therapy teams work well together. Furthermore, the effective combination of high quality care and therapy supports young people to improve anger management skills. Young people take pride in the fact that they have become much better at managing their feelings of anger.
p.5
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.5
Recommendations
ensure that the home contacts placing authorities if a change in the care plan is needed. (NMS 25.5)
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion