Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Feb 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Brooker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Brooker

  • Postcode verified

    OX39 4PU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyvery wellmake good progresswell ledpositiveenthusiasmenjoymentengaging
Criticismnot alwayslack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings531w+74
  • Leadership91w0
  • What needs to improve110w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
715
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms W Heritage Headteacher St Andrew's Church of England Primary School Station Road Chinnor OX39 4PU

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 2 February 2012 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is good.

p.1

Achievement in geography

 Pupils make good progress to achieve standards that are generally above the levels expected. Pupils’ locational knowledge and geographical vocabulary are particularly good; most have a sound knowledge of the places studied and what they are like.  Older pupils demonstrate a secure understanding of the topics they have studied, particularly when they have enjoyed active learning, for example in a Welsh river.  Pupils are able to reach conclusions and can present well-reasoned arguments to explain their thinking and can articulate their understanding impressively well. However, they do not always make connections between different elements of their learning, for example physical and human processes.  Pupils use information and communication technology (ICT) effectively and develop a range of skills in data handling, sometimes based on the collection of first-hand data.  Pupils behave very well and have positive attitudes to learning. Their

p.1

Achievement in geography

evident enthusiasm reflects their interest in the world around them and their enjoyment of geography. Older pupils, for example, spoke excitedly about doing fieldwork and their role in improving amenities in the local park.

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

The quality of teaching in geography is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

 Teaching is well structured, lively and engaging. Assessment criteria provide a sharp focus for pupils’ learning and clear benchmarks to gauge their progress. Lessons proceed at a good pace because teachers and other adults skilfully steer pupils’ thinking with judicious questioning.  Teachers make good use of resources, including multimedia, geographical information systems and ICT to engage the pupils’ interest and promote their curiosity about their wider world. Good use is made of the outside environment and fieldwork to support learning.  Activities are well prepared so that lessons are fun and pupils are actively engaged in learning, for example when blindfolded pupils in Year 1 were given directions to navigate their way around the hall.  Frequent use is made of maps to support learning. Classrooms provide a stimulating environment for learning, with interactive displays and interesting resources. Displays in public areas also bring geography alive

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

and promote pupils’ awe, wonder and curiosity.  Assessment is a notable strength. Teachers mark work conscientiously and make close reference to specific learning objectives when evaluating pupils’ progress.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

The quality of the curriculum in geography is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

 The curriculum covers a suitably broad range of topics at different scales, enabling pupils to systematically develop their skills and build their locational knowledge. The annual focus on a specific continent effectively promotes the pupils’ knowledge and understanding of contrasting parts of the world.  The pupils’ understanding of the global dimension and key geographical concepts such as sustainability, stewardship and interdependence are promoted more effectively through the school’s wider initiatives than the geography topics. Links with a school in Gambia, for example, and whole- school fair trade initiatives, extend the pupils’ learning well.  The curriculum consolidates and develops the pupils’ wider skills, particularly in literacy. Good opportunities are planned for pupils to undertake fieldwork, including a river study on the Year 6 residential.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

The effectiveness of leadership and management in geography is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

 The subject is well led and managed despite the lack of external training or enrichment for the school. The subject leader draws on her knowledge and expertise to guide the development of the subject, using a range of resources.  Systematic procedures are in place to monitor provision and pupil progress. The subject leader reviews teachers’ planning, scrutinises work and speaks with the pupils to evaluate the subject’s effectiveness. Self- evaluation routinely involves governors and informs strategic planning and development.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 promoting greater creativity in the geography curriculum to develop pupils’ deeper understanding of key concepts, such as sustainability, stewardship and interdependence by:  ensuring that these concepts are a central focus of some topics  drawing on the wider initiatives, such as ‘outdoor learning’ and ‘global links’ to promote pupils’ geographical understanding and skills.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion