Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Mrs Bland's Infant School

Inspected 13 Jan 2012 · published 28 Feb 2012 · URN 109887

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Najoud Ensaff (lead), Richard Sutton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jan 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Najoud Ensaff, Richard Sutton

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Inadequate

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    109887

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetySatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedconsistentlyoutstandingpositivegood progresseffectivehighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysweaknessestoo oftenconcernsfailedtoo slowdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1692w+9
  • Leadership520w−1
  • What needs to improve82w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,282
shorter than usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Age group 3 –7 Inspection date(s) 12–13 January 2012 Inspection number 378004 Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 109887 Local authority West Berkshire Inspection number 378004 Inspection dates 12–13 January 2012 Lead inspector Najoud Ensaff

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Infant School category Community Age range of pupils 3–7 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 214 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Ms Emma Shumsky Headteacher Mrs Alison Lewis Date of previous school inspection 15–16 June 2009 School address Jordans Lane Burghfield Common Reading RG73LP Telephone number 01189 832332 Fax number 01189 835867 Email address headteacher.blands@westberks.org 12 The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and

p.1

other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors visited twenty three lessons or part-lessons observing eight teachers. Meetings were held with senior and middle leaders, classroom teachers and members of the governing body. Inspectors observed pupils at work and play, listened to them read and spoke to them about their experiences at school and about their learning.

p.3

Introduction

Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They observed the school’s work, and looked at lesson planning, pupils' books, the school's evaluation documents, the improvement plan, local authority reports, records relating to safeguarding, the monitoring of teaching and the tracking of pupils’ progress, attendance and behaviour. They evaluated 88 questionnaires returned by parents and carers and those completed by staff..

p.3

Information about the school

Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery school is smaller than the average sized primary school. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below average. Most pupils are from White British backgrounds. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is well below average, with very few pupils who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs and or disabilities is below average. Of these, most relate to behavioural, emotional and social difficulties.

p.3

Information about the school

The school's headteacher has been in post since September 2009 and the assistant headteacher joined in January 2010. Two staff and three members of the governing body are new this academic year. The school serves a Traveller community and a British Army housing estate. The school was runner up in a national ecology competition and is recognised locally because of its Green Flag award.

p.3

Information about the school

There is a breakfast and after-school club on site which is not managed by the governing body and is subject to a separate inspection.

p.3

Key findings

 In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a notice to improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to leadership and management.  Leaders and managers have been too slow to act on an improvement point from the previous inspection regarding the provision of guidance to pupils in mathematics. As a result, sustained improvement in achievement, particularly in mathematics, has not been demonstrated.  Standards of attainment declined from significantly above average at Key Stage 1 in 2009 to broadly average in 2011. The proportion of pupils who attained levels higher than expected for their age was significantly lower than the

p.4

Key findings

national figure.  Relative weaknesses in pupils’ mathematical skills at Key Stage 1 mean that attainment in mathematics is below that in English.  Pupils’ attainment at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage is built upon only satisfactorily which means that pupils’ progress and achievement across the school are satisfactory.  Behaviour in lessons and around the school is generally good, although there is the occasional distraction in some lessons because the school’s systems for managing behaviour are not always consistently applied.  School leaders have improved the indoor learning environment for children in Reception since the previous inspection, resulting in a vibrant area for the Early Years Foundation Stage.  Teaching is satisfactory overall with some better teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in some classes at Key Stage 1.  The school is a happy, friendly place where most staff and pupils interact

p.4

Key findings

harmoniously and where pupils are known as individuals. Most parents, carers and staff are supportive of the school; most pupils are happy to attend and attendance has improved from low in 2010 to broadly average.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the skills of leaders and managers at all levels and ensure that:  pupils’ achievement improves, particularly in mathematics at Key Stage 1 and for higher-attaining pupils  the quality of teaching is monitored and reviewed more rigorously and best practice is shared more effectively  teachers’ use of assessment information consistently informs lesson planning and improves classroom practice  teachers’ marking in mathematics consistently guides pupils in their learning  behaviour management systems are monitored regularly and consistently applied.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills and abilities broadly in line with those expected for their age. The children’s skills in solving problems, reasoning and numeracy, as well as their communication, literacy and language skills, are relatively less well developed than other areas of learning. Vibrant and well- organised indoor and outdoor areas provide a positive environment for children. This helps them to develop well in their creative, personal, social and physical skills. In one Reception lesson, planned around traditional stories, children were seen actively engaging in a range of skilfully planned activities that allowed them to experience a sense of awe and wonder. Children learn well in Reception because teachers use a creative curriculum and plan effectively for children’s differing needs. Lessons include fun and interesting activities that develop children’s skills, with teachers carefully

p.5

Achievement of pupils

guiding children in their work and accurately monitoring their progress. As a result, pupils enter Key Stage 1 with solid foundations at the expected levels in reading, writing and mathematics and with good social and creative skills upon which to build.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The vast majority of parents believe their children are making good progress at the school. Inspection evidence found progress to be satisfactory because from their starting points on entry to the school, pupils leave with attainment in mathematics, reading and writing that is broadly average; their achievement is satisfactory.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Progress in lessons for all pupils, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, is satisfactory at Key Stage 1. Pupils generally listen attentively and work hard, responding appropriately to demands placed on them. However, too often, lessons lack sparkle and fail to motivate pupils sufficiently or excite them in their learning. Although there was some good learning, pupils too often were not working at sufficient pace and, the more-able in particular did not always find the work challenging. In the lessons where pupils made good progress, they were fully engaged in their learning, the pace was brisk and work was well matched to their needs. This is because teachers had high expectations, they made clear the purpose of an activity and challenged learners so that pupils knew what it was they were learning and were able to progress well.

p.5

Quality of teaching

The quality of teaching is satisfactory. As a result, pupils make satisfactory progress. Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage is generally good, particularly in helping children to develop their physical, personal, social and emotional skills .

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teachers across the school changed year groups at the start of this academic year, and some are still uncertain of the level at which they should expect children and pupils to work. Consequently, some teaching in both key stages lacks sufficient challenge, particularly for higher attaining pupils, but sometimes for middle attainers too. Overall, teachers’ expectations enable most pupils to make satisfactory progress with a curriculum that generally matches most pupils’ needs and which is helping to stimulate their creativity.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The most effective teaching is where learning is enjoyable and resources, including the outdoor learning environment and information and communication technology, are used creatively, resulting in pupils who are well motivated and excited about learning. These creative and interactive opportunities contribute well to pupils’ spiritual and social development. Religious Education lessons and those based around languages and other countries also help to develop pupils’ moral and cultural understanding.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Helpful support by learning support assistants for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs helps them to make progress generally in line with their peers. However, inconsistencies in teaching and marking mean that sometimes groups of learners are not guided well, particularly in mathematics.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Assessment in English is better and more consistently effective than in mathematics and, as a result, teachers plan for pupils more successfully and pupils receive better guidance . Books are marked regularly and pupils are given suggestions about how to improve. Marking is less regular in mathematics and comments do not always include suggestions about how to improve. Some pupils do not always know how well they are doing, nor do teachers always explain to them how to improve.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The vast majority of parents believe their children are well taught. Inspectors found that, over time, teaching across the school is satisfactory.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Parents, carers, pupils and staff are generally positive about behaviour at the school, with many parents praising the caring attitudes of the headteacher and staff and the school's nurturing atmosphere. Pupils are generally well behaved in lessons but a few occasionally become restless or distracted. A minority of parents and carers who returned the Ofsted questionnaire indicated that they were not satisfied with the school’s management of behaviour and its response to their concerns. Of these a small number of parents and carers raised concerns regarding bullying. Pupils reported that they generally get on well together at school although disagreements sometimes occur. Inspectors found that incidents of bullying are rare and that pupils know about different types of bullying. Overall, pupils report that they feel safe, and their parents and carers agree. One parent wrote of the school being a ‘lovely school

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

with a real community atmosphere’. Another described it as ‘very caring’. Pupils are generally punctual to school and their attendance is average and has improved.

p.7

Leadership and management

Leadership and management are inadequate because leaders have failed to adequately address key weaknesses in the marking and guidance provided to pupils in mathematics at Key Stage 1, an action point from the previous inspection. While leaders have introduced measures to help teachers assess attainment and progress in mathematics and have used external support to help ensure that assessments are accurate, they have not monitored teachers’ planning and practice rigorously enough to ensure that assessment practices are effective. The necessary essential improvements in marking and guidance for pupils in mathematics have not been secured. While teachers guide pupils in lessons and provide suitable oral feedback, this is not reflected adequately in their written comments about pupils’ work. As a result, pupils do not always know how well they are doing in mathematics or how to improve their work. Inspectors found that the school’s systems for managing

p.7

Leadership and management

behaviour and recording what has happened are inconsistently applied by staff and leaders and managers do not make sufficient checks to ensure consistency of practice.

p.7

Leadership and management

Leaders and managers have improved the indoor learning environment and practice in the Early Years Foundation Stage. They have also improved the attainment of minority ethnic pupils, those from the Traveller community, and rates of attendance for all pupils. Leaders have provided teachers with training in a number of areas, including the teaching of reading, and this contributed to better attainment in 2011. The school's self evaluation is generally accurate and leaders and managers' engagement with parents and carers is strong.

p.7

Leadership and management

The governing body has a clear view of the school's strengths and weaknesses and provides appropriate challenge to school leaders. Governors and other leaders make adequate arrangements for safeguarding and promote equality of opportunity and tackle discrimination satisfactorily. Capacity to improve overall, however, is limited because essential improvements have not been secured substantially or quickly enough.

p.7

Leadership and management

The school’s curriculum is satisfactory because it has been revised to incorporate more outdoor learning and more creativity. Pupils’ social development is promoted well through the curriculum, with pupils working well together to solve problems and participating keenly in group drama activities. Themed weeks linked to different countries and the celebration of festivals such as Diwali and Chinese New Year, as well as visits to local churches, enable pupils to develop an understanding of different cultures and spirituality. Their moral and spiritual development is promoted through religious studies lessons and occasions when, for example, Year 2 pupils are encouraged to consider philosophical questions such as pondering what a particular picture or image might suggest about the world.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning. This letter is provided for the school, parents and carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.10

Inspection of Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery School, Reading RG7 3LP

We enjoyed coming to visit your school, watching you in lessons and talking to you. Thank you for being so friendly and helpful during our visit. Your school does currently provide you with a satisfactory education. We have given your school a ‘notice to improve’ because it has not improved quickly enough since the previous inspection. The school will be inspected again in six to eight months' time to check on the progress being made.

p.11

Inspection of Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery School, Reading RG7 3LP

These are the best things about your school.  Most of you said that you enjoy coming to school and that you feel safe there.  Your headteacher knows you all and celebrates your successes.  You have a bright and lively school to work in.  You are encouraged to develop your confidence.  Teachers mark your English work well and tell you how to improve.

p.11

Inspection of Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery School, Reading RG7 3LP

These are the things we have asked your school to do to make it better:  Speed up your progress in mathematics, especially in Years 1 and 2 and for those of you who find some of the work too easy.  Improve the way in which leaders check that teachers are helping you in lessons so that lessons get better.  Ensure teachers plan interesting lessons so you do not find the work too easy.  Make sure that teachers mark your mathematics work and tell you how you can improve it.  Ensure staff follow the school’s systems and record and pass on information, so that you all get along and behave well.

p.11

Inspection of Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery School, Reading RG7 3LP

You can all help by talking to the teacher when you do not understand how to improve your work. We hope that these points will help you and your school to move forward.

p.11

Inspection of Mrs Bland's Infant and Nursery School, Reading RG7 3LP

Najoud Ensaff Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion