Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall

Inspected 3 Feb 2012 · published 27 Feb 2012 · URN 119639

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrew Morley, Chris Maloney

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall

  • URN verified

    119639

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressstrongoutstandingexcellentpositivemake good progressenthusiasmextremely
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysnot confidentbelowconcernsinsufficientconcernnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1979w+66
  • Leadership514w+56
  • What needs to improve77w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,561
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall Inspection report

p.1

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 2–3 February 2012 Inspection number 379861 Unique Reference Number 119639 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 379861 Inspection dates 2–3 February 2012 Lead inspector Andrew Morley

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 244 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Kevin Lyth Headteacher Jacqueline McNally Date of previous school inspection 7 October 2008 School address Lourdes Avenue Lostock Hall Preston PR5 5TB Telephone number 01772 335025 Fax number 01772 629561 Email address head@ourlady-st-gerards.lancs.sch.uk Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 2 of 11

p.1

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for loo ked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.2

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 3 of 11

p.2

Introduction

Andrew Morley Chris Maloney Additional inspector Additional inspector

p.3

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspectors observed 10 lessons and parts of lessons, taught by nine teachers, including a high level teaching assistant. Meetings were held with pupils, nine members of the governing body, subject leaders and senior staff. The inspector observed the school's work, and looked at pupils’ workbooks, internal and external pupil progress data, school improvement planning and documentation in relation to safeguarding and child protection. The inspector also took account of 64 questionnaires returned by parents and carers, 68 completed by pupils in Key Stage 1 and 2, and 16 returned by teaching and support staff. No responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) were available when planning the inspection.

p.3

Information about the school

The school is average in size. Most pupils are of White British heritage. A very small proportion are from minority ethnic backgrounds and speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs is well-below average; the number of pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals is well-below average. The school met the government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for attainment and progress, in 2011. A new headteacher was appointed in April 2010. The school has been awarded the Activemark, a Design and Technology Quality Mark, and has achieved Healthy Schools status. There is a pre-school group which is subject to separate inspection. The report may be found on the Ofsted website. Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 4 of 11

p.3

Information about the school

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key Findings

 This is a good school. When children enter school their skills are generally below those typically expected for their age, particularly in communication, language and literacy. Provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage ensures that the majority enter Year 1 having made good progress in each of the six areas of learning. At the end of Key Stage 2 pupils’ attainment has increased year-on-year and is broadly average. Attainment is rising and increasingly above average, with good progress being made overall. Pupils with special educational needs make the same progress as other pupils. The school recognises that there is the potential to improve the attainment being made by some of the higher-attaining pupils.

p.4

Key Findings

 The quality of teaching is good and improving. Teaching has many strengths, and relationships between pupils and between pupils and the adults who work with them are strong. Teachers’ subject knowledge, particularly in the core subjects, is a strength and contributes to the good progress in lessons. Pupils with special educational needs and disabled pupils receive well-focused, additional support and make good progress from their specific starting points. There is now greater consistency in the quality of teaching across the school but the school is aware that this needs to improve further, for example in relation to challenge, particularly for higher-attaining pupils.

p.4

Key Findings

 The behaviour of the pupils is good. Pupils behave well and show respect and interest in the views of others. They enjoy coming to school, which is reflected in their above- average attendance. All groups of learners spoke confidently about safety and demonstrated that they were physically, emotionally and socially very safe. A typical comment is, ‘Staff care about us and make sure we are safe’. They say that bullying does not happen and are confident that staff deal with any worries or concerns they raise. Safeguarding procedures and practice fully meet national requirements.

p.4

Key Findings

 The leadership provides energy and drive and ensures all staff, the governing body, parents and carers and pupils share a strong vision to improve the school in all aspects. Ably supported by the deputy headteacher, the headteacher leads by example and engenders good levels of teamwork and accountability among all staff. Plans for improvement, which are supported by accurate quality assurance processes, identify Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 5 of 11

p.4

Key Findings

priorities for improvement in all aspects of school life. Whereas senior leaders have a good understanding of the qualities of the school and self-evaluation, subject leaders have insufficient impact on school improvement.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Further accelerate pupils’ progress by: - raising expectations and improving planning in lessons to ensure more-able pupils achieve higher levels in English and mathematics - ensuring they know their targets and how to reach the next level in their work.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure subject leaders lead the improvement of their subject by: - effective use of the accurate self-evaluation - monitoring and evaluating the impact of their subject - developing and leading continuous professional development of staff.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils’ enthusiasm to do well and succeed makes a strong contribution to their good progress. They cooperate well with staff and each other, showing good levels of engagement in lessons. Pupils are rightly proud of their writing which has improved significantly. They demonstrate good skills in information and communication technology (ICT) and use computers with confidence. When given the opportunity they value and are skilled in pair and group work, supporting each other in their learning. The work in pupils’ books, observations in lessons and school tracking data show that pupils are generally making good progress from their starting points that are below the expected level for pupils of their age. However, when expectation and tasks are not correctly matched to different abilities, progress is satisfactory rather than good.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children enter the Reception class with skills in communication, language, literacy and mathematics which are below those expected for their age. They make good progress and achieve well in all areas of learning. Progress is maintained and by the end of Key Stage 1 attainment is consistently average in reading, writing and mathematics. This continues into Key Stage 2 with overall attainment being at least at the national average. Current attainment at Key Stage 2 is above average for the majority of pupils. Pupils with special educational needs make the same progress as their peers because of the focused support they receive.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Reading is a high priority in the school and lessons about letters and the sounds they make are taught systematically on a daily basis. This is appreciated by the pupils, who show increasing enthusiasm for reading and many read independently at home. By the end of Key Stage 1, pupils’ attainment in reading is average. However, the quality of provision and pupils’ good attitudes to reading mean that currently many pupils display above average levels of fluency and most can read complex vocabulary. In Key Stage 2 and by the end of Year 6, pupils are confident and fluent readers and their reading skills are above average. Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 6 of 11

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The school has rigorous systems to ensure that no group is underachieving. The vast majority of parents and carers who returned the questionnaires are happy with the progress their children are making. As one parent commented, ‘I am extremely pleased with the progress of my child, who is taught by a positive teacher, who is striving to bring about the best in her pupils’. Pupils’ good application of basic skills across many areas of school life shows they are well prepared for their future lives.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The great majority of lessons observed were good and pupils have a very positive attitude to learning. Meticulous planning, good subject knowledge, the use of stimulating resources, including ICT, and interesting activities motivate pupils to work hard in lessons. In the best lessons, teachers use assessment well to identify starting points for learning and precise questioning challenges pupils to think deeply. The curriculum provides the opportunity for pupils to connect their learning across subjects. For example, in a Year 4 English lesson, accurate ongoing assessment of the progress which pupils were making allowed the teacher to personalise the outcomes for individual pupils so that pupils’ learning was of high quality. In a Year 5 lesson pupils enjoyed learning and developing scientific knowledge about the world’s rainforests and at the same time developed creative language to improve their writing skills.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Where lessons were less effective pupils are given the same task that does not provide for individual learning needs. In particular, challenge was not always appropriate to maximise the achievement of higher-attaining pupils. On occasions, therefore, these pupils receive work which does not require them to think deeply enough about the subject matter. However, good use of assessment to track pupils’ ongoing progress leads to school leaders spotting underachievement quickly. Pupils are beginning to assess their own work, responding to their teacher’s marking to show their understanding. Although they know their targets they are not always confident in how to respond to them and how to reach the next level in their work.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The school monitors the progress of pupils well, individually, in groups and in classes. It is, therefore, able to identify any underachievement rapidly and provide good support to ensure that pupils come back on track to meet their targets. Detailed feedback on lesson observations and the emphasis on focused professional development continue to improve the quality of teaching across the school. The majority of questionnaires returned by parents and carers indicate a high level of satisfaction with the quality of teaching their children receive. Teaching promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development effectively and mutual respect abounds.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils say with confidence that they are safe in school and that their classmates, ‘playground buddies’ and the adults who work with them look after them well. Parents and carers agree and the great majority of those who returned the questionnaires expressed the view that their children believe they are safe and well cared for in school. A typical comment was, ‘All staff are extremely dedicated to the well-being of the children.’ Pupils appreciate the emphasis the school places on their safety and happiness and make particular mention of the support they receive from adults when they have worries or are unhappy. This is aided by the good health promotion and personal development work throughout the school. Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 7 of 11

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The school council is an outstanding example of pupils playing a strategic leadership role in improving their school. Through it, pupils are active in their rejection of bullying in all its forms. For example, the school council designed, planned and led an ‘anti-bullying and friendship week’ which has been instrumental in all pupils having a positive attitude to ‘friendship’ and an understanding that bullying is wrong. Furthermore, pupils say that the school teaches them about what forms bullying can take and the dangers of each of them, for example, cyber-bullying.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

During the inspection, pupils’ conduct around school was invariably good and there were few examples of off-task behaviour in lessons. However, there were examples when pupils did not show the high levels of consideration on corridors and moving in and out of the hall. Parents and carers, staff and pupils are of the view that behaviour has improved since the arrival of the new headteacher and that pupils always represent their school in the local community with maturity. Pupils are happy, confident and secure in school and this is reflected in attendance which has been consistently above the national average. Punctuality is also a particular strength.

p.7

Leadership and management

The relatively new leadership has brought a drive to the school. All staff, the governing body, parents and carers and pupils share a strong vision to improve the school in all aspects. Accurate and honest self-evaluation and an overriding concern, shared by all staff, to further raise standards and achievement mean that the school is well placed to secure further improvement. The capacity to improve further is, therefore, good. Senior leaders and subject leaders are being supported and guided in promoting improvements in their particular areas. However, this is at an early stage, and the leadership of the school understands the need for subject leaders to take the initiative to lead the improvements. The governing body is fully supportive of the school’s direction for development and members challenge leaders with increasing rigour. The school promotes equality of opportunity well and has effective strategies to tackle discrimination on the rare occasions

p.7

Leadership and management

this may occur. Safeguarding and child protection arrangements are secure, regularly reviewed, and fully meet national requirements. Engagement and communication with parents and carers are excellent, and as a result, an overwhelming proportion of parents and carers appreciate the dedication and contribution of the school and its staff.

p.7

Leadership and management

The curriculum is broad and balanced and provides pupils with a good variety of extra- curricular and enrichment activities which are popular and well attended. Pupils spoke with great enthusiasm about visits such as one to a recycling centre and the opportunity to learn a modern foreign language. Pupils are learning French and the standard is very high. The key skills of reading, writing and numeracy are prioritised in the curriculum. Opportunities for pupils to develop writing across subjects have been instrumental in higher standards in writing at all phases of the school. The impact of the curriculum on pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. However, the school recognises the need to provide the pupils with more first-hand opportunities to help them develop their understanding of other cultures which are different to their own.

p.7

Leadership and management

Pupils benefit from good partnerships with a range of outside agencies and the local high school. The school is very active within a local cluster of Catholic primary schools and has good links with Edge Hill University. Relationships with the parish and local community are excellent. The school knows its community well and reaches out to meet the needs of all members of the community. Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 8 of 11

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 9 of 11

p.8

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning. Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 10 of 11

p.9

to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main

findings from the inspection of their school.

p.10

Lostock Hall, Preston, PR5 5TB

Thank you for the friendly welcome you gave the inspectors and for being so polite and kind when we inspected your school. We enjoyed meeting you and seeing you enjoying learning and the many interesting things you do.

p.10

Lostock Hall, Preston, PR5 5TB

The inspectors judge that your school is good and that you are making good progress. Your teachers are working hard to help you in your learning and it was pleasing to see the improvement that you have made and that you are enjoying doing your topic work. Your behaviour in class is good and you play well together. We really liked the way in which the older children cared for and helped look after the younger ones. The school council is outstanding and you should all be proud of what the council is doing on your behalf. You know how to stay safe and many of you told us how much your teachers care about you.

p.10

Lostock Hall, Preston, PR5 5TB

Your headteacher, staff and governors are working hard to help you do even better. To help them in this we have asked them to ensure the work set is challenging so that the more-able pupils achieve higher levels in English and mathematics. We have also asked them to ensure that staff help your headteacher by being the leaders of the different subjects that you study.  Once again, thank you for making us so welcome. All of you are a credit to your school. Keep on being kind to each other; help your teachers and work hard to make your school even better.

p.10

Lostock Hall, Preston, PR5 5TB

Andrew Morley Lead inspector Inspection report: Our Lady and St Gerard's Roman Catholic Primary School, Lostock Hall, 2–3 February 2012 11 of 11

p.10

Lostock Hall, Preston, PR5 5TB

procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion