Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jackie Krafft
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Well-planned arrangements for pupils to get to know their new teachers and become familiar with the routines of their classes begin before pupils leave the Reception Year, so pupils are happy, confident and settle quickly into Year 1. p.1
- Suitable links are being established with other local outstanding practitioners to maintain the momentum of changes that have already been made to transition. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop transition at your school. p.3
- As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
- A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“Parents and carers are very positive about the transition.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 818
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visits on 10 October 2011 and 7 February 2012 to look at your work in transition from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1.
p.1
Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools
The visits provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: responses from parents in Year 1 to a questionnaire; interviews with Year 1 parents, careers and pupils; discussions with senior leaders and teachers in Reception and Year 1; scrutiny of relevant documents; observation of four lessons and the teaching of phonics.
p.1
Early Years Foundation Stage to primary schools
Overall, the transition from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1 is satisfactory.
p.1
Key findings
Pupils make satisfactory progress in their learning from their good foundation in the Reception class as they move into Year 1. The school’s records show that their progress accelerates again in Year 2 so that by the end of Key Stage 1 pupils attain at least the standards expected for their age in reading, writing and mathematics. A consistent approach to teaching phonics ensures that pupils build their early reading and writing skills systematically from Reception to Year 1. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Key findings
Mr R Sullivan Headteacher Our Lady and St Philip Neri Roman Catholic Primary School 208 Sydenham Road London SE26 5SE Well-planned arrangements for pupils to get to know their new teachers and become familiar with the routines of their classes begin before pupils leave the Reception Year, so pupils are happy, confident and settle quickly into Year 1. Parents and carers are very positive about the transition. They say that they, and their children, have been well supported so the change has been smooth and without interruption to learning. They feel that they have been kept well informed about the transition arrangements which have helped them to prepare their children too. Parents and carers of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities feel that arrangements have been tailored to their child’s emotional needs effectively. Through close liaison between staff, teaching in the first half of the
p.1
Key findings
autumn term in Year 1 is increasingly closely aligned with the approaches adopted in the Early Years Foundation Stage which contributes to a smooth transition. Pupils work well together and independently because routines in Reception are continued in Year 1. There is a gradual change to more formal, discrete subject teaching in the second half of the autumn as the school assesses that pupils are ready which contributes to their satisfactory progress in Year 1. However, the pace of learning in Year 1 lessons observed varied. When the pace of learning was less brisk, tasks and timely adult interventions did not consistenty challenge all pupils to accelerate their progress. Assessments are carried out regularly and monitoring information is analysed systematically to identify the progress that individuals and groups of pupils are making. However, the different assessments used provide inconsistent information with the result that school is not able to
p.2
Key findings
rigorously evaluate the rate of progress that pupils are making from the end of Reception through Year 1. A specific transition policy makes the aims and expectations of a smooth transition for pupils explicit. An action plan to develop this further identifes next steps but lacks quantifiable goals and success measures to evaluate the impact of actions on the outcomes for pupils. There has been significant staff change recently. A Year 1 teacher and the leader of the Early Years Foundation Stage have left so temporary arrangements are in place to fulfil these roles. Suitable links are being established with other local outstanding practitioners to maintain the momentum of changes that have already been made to transition.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
improving the quality of the action plan for transition by including quantifiable goals and measures of success so that the impact of actions on the pupils’ progress and provision is clear ensuring that pupils in Year 1 are consistently challenged to accelerate their progress in lessons by: consistently matching challenging work to the different abilities of pupils ensuring that teachers and teaching assistants intervene and engage with pupils who are participating less effectively, including during whole-class activity reviewing how the knowledge and skills that pupils have when they start Year 1 are assessed and monitored, so that the evaluation of their progress is consistent and accurate.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop transition at your school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion