Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Feb 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Grimmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Grimmer

  • Postcode verified

    HU1 3DG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery effectiveeffectivelyknowledgeableaccurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings404w+72
  • What needs to improve111w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
508
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 22%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms E McMahon Principal Hull College Queens Gardens Kingston-upon Hull HU1 3DG

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on 6 and 7 February 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and participants; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of participants’ work; and observation of two learning sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 The development of suitable employability provision has formed a key part of Hull College’s adult learning strategic plan. It aims to support the new national employability drive and initiatives to ensure that the college will help people develop the skills they need to progress into work.  The college uses its discretional funding effectively to plan, market, develop and deliver suitable provision for unemployed participants. In particular, it has prioritised funding to develop bespoke courses, train and recruit staff and develop resources and premises to offer dedicated provision for the unemployed.  The college has worked well with Jobcentre Plus to develop and deliver very effective sector-based skills academies and to recruit participants for courses specifically linked to vacancies at local employers. The college is proactive in working with local and national employers to design and deliver bespoke pre-employment training leading to work trials, interviews

p.1

Key findings

and sustainable employment opportunities.  Courses provide good teaching and learning that enable participants to develop their skills, knowledge and confidence levels to prepare them for employment. Well qualified, experienced and knowledgeable staff provide good support that helps to motivate and inspire participants. However, participants do not have sufficient opportunities to practise their skills in realistic work environments or on work-experience placements.  Initial assessment is good and participants can access good Skills for Life provision to help them improve their literacy, numeracy or English language skills. Diagnostic testing also identifies specific learning difficulties such as dyslexia that leads to further analysis and specialist help where required.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 making better use of work-experience opportunities to update participants’ work skills and improve their confidence and using the college’s realistic working environments to provide operative or supervisory work experience for those participants who need to update their work skills and practices  developing systems further to provide accurate information about participants’ post-course destinations.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Hull College

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion