Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Feb 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Josephine Nowacki

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Josephine Nowacki

  • Postcode verified

    M14 5RB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongextremelyexcellenthigh qualityoutstandinghigh expectationswarmrigorous
Criticismlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings423w+87
  • What needs to improve81w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
492
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs M Hunter Principal Xaverian College Lower Park Road Manchester M14 5RB

p.1

progress and achieve

Thank you for your warm welcome and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 31 January and 1 February 2012 to look at your work in supporting students to progress and achieve.

p.1

progress and achieve

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in supporting college students. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your college is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress and achieve

The evidence used to inform the judgements included scrutiny of documentation and meetings with senior managers, support staff and students.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college’s mission to develop the whole student underpins the extremely high priority given to pastoral support. An extensive network of internal support and strong collaboration with external organisations helps students, especially those who are most vulnerable, stay at college and achieve outstanding results.  Excellent links between academic and pastoral support are in place. Pastoral roles are carried out by teachers and this is a significant factor in promoting the strong teamwork that results in high quality personalised support for individuals.  The college demonstrates an innovative approach to individual learning plans (ILP). A bespoke electronic system is valued highly by students because it helps keep them on track and motivated, and is extremely easy to use.  High quality electronic learning materials that are accessible and help promote a culture of independent learning are provided. A well-established

p.1

Features of good practice observed

subject support system, linked to the electronic ILP is instrumental in enabling students to meet and exceed their targets.  The college has an all-pervasive ‘can do’ culture. Very committed and well- trained staff have high expectations of all their students.  Considerable investment in staff development is in place, combined with a strong focus on sharing best practice within the college and externally with other sixth form colleges in the North of England.  A comprehensive group tutorial programme and wide-ranging enrichment activities help students broaden their outlook and views, develop personally and improve self-esteem.  Rigorous quality assurance procedures monitor all aspects of pastoral and academic support. Ongoing evaluations by staff and students are used routinely to inform the strategic development of student support services. This ensures good value for money and improves students’ progress and

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 using the college’s analysis of participation in enrichment activities by different groups of students to inform and shape the enrichment offer and to encourage more students to develop their talents  ensuring that individual action points for students are more consistently written to the highest quality.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your approaches to providing support for your students. As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion