Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Feb 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Gale

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Gale

  • Postcode verified

    SO22 6RX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrengthshigh qualityexcellentsuccessfullycleareffectivelyvery wellvery high
Criticismlimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings659w+87
  • What needs to improve103w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
748
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Neil Hopkins Principal Peter Symonds College Owens Road Winchester SO22 6RX

p.1

qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your provision in the week beginning 16 January 2012. Please pass my thanks on to your staff for the time they gave to our telephone discussions and for the information which they provided before and during the inspection.

p.1

qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and to a published national overview report. This report will identify the overall quality of provision leading to Awarding Body qualifications and identify the overall strengths and areas for development. However, in line with previous practice, inspectors will not make graded judgements of the quality of the provision in each centre; they will evaluate and feed back identified strengths and any points for further development. These are outlined below for your centre.

p.1

qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector

The published overview report will list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Outcomes for trainees

Each year Peter Symonds recruits around ten trainees to follow its City and Guilds Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector (DTLLS) course following completion of a Preparing to Teach in the Lifelong Learning Sector (PTLLS) course. Trainees follow the first year of a DTLLS programme before transferring onto a University of Greenwich professional graduate certificate in education (PGCE) course. On completion of their PGCE they also receive full DTLLS accreditation from City and Guilds. Retention and pass rates are high on the first year of the DTLLS programme. Around two thirds go on to successfully complete the full DTLLS and PGCE which is in line with the national average. The proportion successfully completing the full teaching qualification shows a trend of continuing improvement over the last few years. Trainees are carefully selected for the ability and aptitude to complete the course. Careful attention is given to

p.1

Outcomes for trainees

making sure that courses match trainees roles well and take full account of future career and professional development aspirations. The college provides very clear progression routes starting with PTLLS and culminating with the PGCE programme at the University of Greenwich.

p.2

Outcomes for trainees

Most trainees start the course after securing a teaching role in their specialist field. The course effectively develops their understanding of the theory of teaching and helps them to reflect on and assess the progress of their learners. The majority are employed at Peter Symonds and make a significant contribution to learners’ progress both during and after their training.

p.2

The key strengths are:

 very high success rates on the first year of the programme  an experienced and knowledgeable team of tutors who provide high quality central training which is much enjoyed by trainees  the way training, lesson feedback and tutorials combine to help trainees reflect on how effectively they have put the theory learnt into practice  the high quality of personal support for trainees by tutors who know their trainees very well  the way in which feedback to trainees on their teaching is very encouraging, good on identifying strengths and building confidence  feedback on assignments is good and provides a clear indication of how the assessment criteria are met and how to improve  self-assessment is rigorous and usefully follows the format of the common inspection framework; trainees are fully involved in the process bringing real benefit to course development  all trainees undertake a behaviour management module which they report

p.2

The key strengths are:

as a very valuable aspects of their training  clear progression routes are available from preparing to teach through to a full teaching qualification and on to professional formation  trainees’ extensive and up-to-date knowledge of their specialist subject area  excellent communication between the college and its partners to support trainees and develop bespoke courses to suit the needs of employers and facilitate transition to a full teaching qualification.

p.2

The key areas for development are:

 sharpening initial needs analysis and rigorously monitoring individual trainee’s progress against clear expectations and setting challenging developmental targets  identifying the trainees whose teaching is limited to a narrow range of learners and develop opportunities to broaden their experience  further embed the roles and responsibilities of the subject mentor, identified in the new mentor handbook, for providing subject specific input to training and involvement in evaluation and development of the training.

p.3

The key areas for development are:

As explained in the inspection guidance, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion