Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Feb 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Richard Beynon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Richard Beynon

  • Postcode verified

    BH14 0LS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserapid progressexcellentstrengths
Criticismerrorsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings515w+71
  • What needs to improve59w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
566
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Angela Cox Director of Innovation in Learning The College, Bournemouth and Poole North Road Poole Dorset BH14 0LS

p.1

qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your provision on w/c 16 January, for the time you gave to our telephone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection.

p.1

qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and to a published national overview report. This report will identify the overall quality of provision leading to Awarding Body qualifications and identify the overall strengths and areas for development. However, in line with previous practice, inspectors will not make graded judgements of the quality of the provision in each centre; they will evaluate and feed back identified strengths and any points for further development. These are outlined below for your centre.

p.1

qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector

The published overview report will list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Outcomes for trainees

Success rates are high across all programmes and for all modes of delivery. During 2010/11 success rates for Certificate in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector (CTLLS) programmes overall were around ten percentage points above national averages. On some individual programmes during the past three years success rates have exceeded national averages by as much as twenty percentage points. On Preparation to Teach in the Lifelong Learning Sector (PTLLS) programmes, success rates are just above a high national average. Retention rates are high for all modes of delivery, averaging 95% across the past three years.

p.1

Outcomes for trainees

Trainees make at least good and sometimes very rapid progress from their starting points. Progression between PTLLS and CTLLS programmes is good, and shows a rising trend across the past three years. In 2009/10 and 2010/11, around 50% of trainees from CTLLS programmes progressed to certificate in education (Cert. Ed.) or professional graduate certificate in education (PGCE) provision. Many trainees entering the college to pursue only a PTLLS award have progressed to higher level awards, including Cert. Ed., PGCE, or a BA (Hons) in post-compulsory education and training (PCET) at the college’s linked higher education institution.

p.2

Key strengths identified during the visit:

 good alignment of ITE team and programmes with the quality and innovation team to play a core role in college quality improvement strategies  high success and retention rates for all modes of delivery, with success rates around ten percentage points above national average  very good progression across awarding body qualifications and from awarding body qualifications to higher education institution awards at graduate and post-graduate levels  trainees make at least good and often very rapid progress from their starting points  Trainees demonstrate a very good understanding of their own progress and development  trainees have high personal and professional standards in their approaches to the courses and their learners  feedback on assignments and after lesson observation is at least good, and sometimes excellent, with the finest examples identifying and correcting stylistic, grammatical and other technical errors.

p.2

Areas for development identified during the visit:

 develop trainers’ understanding of the wider lifelong learning sector so that they may in turn broaden trainees’ understandings. As explained in the inspection guidance, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next inspection.

p.2

Areas for development identified during the visit:

Many thanks for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion