Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Richard Beynon
- Postcode verified
BH14 0LS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Trainees make at least good and sometimes very rapid progress from their starting points. p.2
- trainees make at least good and often very rapid progress from their starting points p.2
- feedback on assignments and after lesson observation is at least good, and sometimes excellent, with the finest examples identifying and correcting stylistic, grammatical and other technical errors. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 566
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Angela Cox Director of Innovation in Learning The College, Bournemouth and Poole North Road Poole Dorset BH14 0LS
p.1
qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your provision on w/c 16 January, for the time you gave to our telephone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection.
p.1
qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and to a published national overview report. This report will identify the overall quality of provision leading to Awarding Body qualifications and identify the overall strengths and areas for development. However, in line with previous practice, inspectors will not make graded judgements of the quality of the provision in each centre; they will evaluate and feed back identified strengths and any points for further development. These are outlined below for your centre.
p.1
qualifications in the lifelong learning/further education sector
The published overview report will list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.
p.1
Outcomes for trainees
Success rates are high across all programmes and for all modes of delivery. During 2010/11 success rates for Certificate in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector (CTLLS) programmes overall were around ten percentage points above national averages. On some individual programmes during the past three years success rates have exceeded national averages by as much as twenty percentage points. On Preparation to Teach in the Lifelong Learning Sector (PTLLS) programmes, success rates are just above a high national average. Retention rates are high for all modes of delivery, averaging 95% across the past three years.
p.1
Outcomes for trainees
Trainees make at least good and sometimes very rapid progress from their starting points. Progression between PTLLS and CTLLS programmes is good, and shows a rising trend across the past three years. In 2009/10 and 2010/11, around 50% of trainees from CTLLS programmes progressed to certificate in education (Cert. Ed.) or professional graduate certificate in education (PGCE) provision. Many trainees entering the college to pursue only a PTLLS award have progressed to higher level awards, including Cert. Ed., PGCE, or a BA (Hons) in post-compulsory education and training (PCET) at the college’s linked higher education institution.
p.2
Key strengths identified during the visit:
good alignment of ITE team and programmes with the quality and innovation team to play a core role in college quality improvement strategies high success and retention rates for all modes of delivery, with success rates around ten percentage points above national average very good progression across awarding body qualifications and from awarding body qualifications to higher education institution awards at graduate and post-graduate levels trainees make at least good and often very rapid progress from their starting points Trainees demonstrate a very good understanding of their own progress and development trainees have high personal and professional standards in their approaches to the courses and their learners feedback on assignments and after lesson observation is at least good, and sometimes excellent, with the finest examples identifying and correcting stylistic, grammatical and other technical errors.
p.2
Areas for development identified during the visit:
develop trainers’ understanding of the wider lifelong learning sector so that they may in turn broaden trainees’ understandings. As explained in the inspection guidance, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next inspection.
p.2
Areas for development identified during the visit:
Many thanks for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion