Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Chinley Primary School

Inspected 1 Feb 2012 · published 24 Feb 2012 · URN 112527

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Tim Bristow (lead), Robin Sidaway

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Robin Sidaway, Tim Bristow

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Chinley Primary School

  • URN verified

    112527

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetySatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivestrongvery welleffectivelywell behavedhighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticisminadequatelimitedconcernsinconsistentnot alwaysinsufficientnot yetvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1927w+33
  • Leadership663w+50
  • What needs to improve178w+11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,764
about usual (typical 3005)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 44
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 3
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 31 January–1 February

p.1

Inspection number 378506 Chinley Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 112527 Local authority Derbyshire Inspection number 378506 Inspection dates 31 January–1 February 2012 Lead inspector Tim Bristow HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Foundation Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 209 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Phil Ockenden Headteacher Peter Lambert Date of previous school inspection 8 January 2007 School address Buxton Road Chinley High Peak SK23 6DR Telephone number 01663 750367 Fax number 01663 750367 Email address info@chinley.derbyshire.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Inspectors observed nine teachers and visited 25 lessons. They held meetings with members of the governing body, the headteacher, staff and five groups of pupils. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They observed the school’s work, and looked at: the school development plan, governing body meeting minutes, assessment information, lesson plans, school safety procedures and responses to questionnaires from 104 parents and carers.

p.3

Information about the school

The school is a smaller than the average-sized primary school. The proportions of pupils from minority ethnic heritages, and those who speak English as an additional language are below average. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is below average. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is also below average.

p.3

Information about the school

Pupils are able to attend a before-and-after school club that is managed by the governing body. There is a privately managed pre-school on site that is subject to separate inspection arrangements. The school meets the current floor standard, whereby the government sets the minimum expectations for attainment and progress. The school has achieved National Healthy School status. The headteacher took up his post in January 2012. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a satisfactory school. Usually, pupils make the expected progress and, by the time they leave Year 6, attainment in English and mathematics is above average. However, the rate of progress varies throughout the school and some groups, such as the more-able pupils, do not make the progress that they could. In the Early Years Foundation Stage the achievement of children in all areas of learning is good. Pupils are well behaved and polite. Their behaviour is limited to satisfactory because they are not given sufficient opportunity to take responsibility for their own work and demonstrate their independence. Pupils enjoy the jobs they carry out around the school but, again, they are limited in what they can achieve. As one pupil reported, ‘We want to organise activities and events; we have not yet been able to, but we have high hopes for the future.’ The quality of teaching in lessons is inconsistent and varies – generally from

p.4

Key findings

satisfactory to good. Marking is not as helpful as it could be. It does not give pupils sufficient guidance on what they should do to improve their work. The school is emerging from a year of turbulence caused by leadership difficulties. School leaders and the governing body successfully managed to continue aspects of school improvement, such as the teaching of reading, while maintaining good care and above-average attainment for pupils. Leaders at all levels are keen to take more responsibility for school improvement, but in the past the opportunity for them to do this has been limited. The new headteacher has made a promising start and comments from parents and carers, staff, pupils and governors demonstrate that he has quickly gained their trust.

p.4

Key findings

Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the rate of progress of all pupils so that they exceed national Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

expectations by July 2013, by:  increasing, considerably, the proportion of lessons where teaching is at least good  providing work that is much more challenging, particularly for the more- able pupils in mathematics  improving marking and guidance so that pupils are able to take more responsibility for their work  sharing the best practice that exists in the school.  Ensure, directly, that school leaders and the governing body are more effective in driving school improvement by:  keeping a careful check on the quality of teaching and learning resulting in the large majority being at least good  paying more attention to the progress of pupils in lessons and over time so that it exceeds national expectations  enabling middle leaders to take greater responsibility for driving improvements to teaching and learning.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage well prepared for learning. They then make good progress in all areas. By the time they enter Year 1, nearly all pupils exceed the skill development that is typical for their age. The skill development of the majority is well above that expected for their age. Usually, by the time pupils leave Year 6 they make the expected progress, but in 2011 more-able pupils, disabled pupils and those with special educational needs made slower progress than similar groups nationally in mathematics and English. However, assessment information and analysis of pupils’ work show that this year disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are making similar progress to others in school. This is as a result of improvements to procedures to check their progress and additional activities to accelerate their learning. In writing, particularly at Key Stage 2, the

p.5

Achievement of pupils

progress of all pupils is accelerating. A few parents and carers are concerned that their children do not make the progress that they could and inspectors agree that this has been the case for some pupils, particularly the more able. Assessment information shows that there are no significant differences in the progress made by pupils of different ethnic heritages.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

By the time pupils leave Year 2, nearly all of them can read and, consequently, their attainment is, in general, above average. Even those who find reading challenging are well equipped with the necessary skills to recognise sounds so that they can try to read words that they are not familiar with. By the time pupils leave Year 6, their attainment in reading is above average. Typically, in lessons seen, some groups, for example, the pupils that find learning more challenging, make better progress in Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

English and mathematics than others because they are well supported by teaching assistants and other adults. A few pupils who may be working independently make slower progress because the expectations of what they should achieve are not precise enough. The more-able pupils in mathematics are not given sufficient opportunity to use their own ideas, or to demonstrate their understanding through application of their skills in problem-solving activities or open-ended investigations.

p.6

Quality of teaching

A strong feature of teaching is the care that pupils receive. Nearly all parents and carers appreciate this and many made comments expressing how pleased they were with this aspect of their children’s education. The relationships between the pupils and adults are good. Pupils’ spiritual, moral social and cultural development is promoted well in lessons. Cooperation and respect for each other’s ideas and answers are evident in all lessons. Teaching is satisfactory overall, because a few pupils do not always make the progress that they could. Teachers do not use their knowledge of the pupils sufficiently well to prepare work that is as challenging as it could be. Occasionally, too much time is spent by the teacher introducing the lesson to the whole class and pupils have to listen to instructions or advice that is not relevant to the work that they will be doing.

p.6

Quality of teaching

There is good teaching, such as the teaching of reading in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1 and in writing lessons at Key Stage 2. This has been underpinned by improvements to the curriculum and teaching led by school leaders over the last two years. For example, in an interesting English lesson in Year 5, pupils worked very well in groups creating their own poems. They were thoroughly engaged in this work and were able to demonstrate good behaviour in terms of teamwork, independence and creativity. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, where teaching is good, children benefit from a good range of activities that are well tailored to meet their needs. Effective assessment and questioning take place during these lessons to check the progress of children.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Marking is variable in quality. It is best in English. For example, in Years 4 and 6 pupils receive good, systematic guidance on how to improve their work. This enables them to take responsibility for improving it as they know the steps they need to take to attain higher standards in their writing. This is not the case in mathematics or other subjects. Marking is completed conscientiously and pupils receive praise and guidance on where their work needs correcting. But the advice given is not as helpful as in English in enabling pupils to understand the steps they need to take to improve their work to reach their targets.

p.6

Quality of teaching

One good feature of lessons is that teachers take the opportunity to link learning to develop pupils’ understanding of other cultures. For example, in a Year 6 science lesson, pupils were learning how to filter dirty water. This was effectively linked to the plight of communities abroad where all they have to drink is polluted water.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Attendance is above average. Nearly all the pupils report that they feel safe in school and their parents agree. Pupils report that incidents of bullying are rare and that when they occur the school deals with them well. Nearly all parents and carers think that pupils are well behaved and some comment that the management of behaviour is handled effectively. Very few parents are concerned about behaviour or bullying. However, thorough discussion with pupils and inspectors’ close observations indicated that these concerns could not be substantiated. The pupils are generally responsible when playing outside, but their awareness of how to stay safe is not as well developed as it could be. For example, a group of Year 6 pupils reported that they understood that they should adopt safe practices when using the internet, but when questioned they were unsure as to the steps they should take to stay safe.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils are well behaved in lessons, but their behaviour is restricted to satisfactory when considered over time. Where teaching is satisfactory they comply with instructions, but they have insufficient opportunity to demonstrate their initiative, perseverance or independence because tasks are too prescriptive. In lessons where teaching is better, their behaviour makes a much stronger contribution to their learning. For example, in a Year 6 history lesson, pupils worked very well in groups designing and producing model suitcases and their contents for children evacuated during the Second World War.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils are confident, respectful and considerate to each other and polite to visitors to their school. For example, children in the Early Years Foundation Stage were keen to talk and explain what they were doing. In assembly, pupils of all ages and staff sang together beautifully evoking a strong sense of belonging to a wider family in school. Pupils on the school council report that they would like to make a stronger contribution to the school and wider community. Their opportunity to do this has been limited lately, but they are excited about the opportunity to take the lead in future projects, such as the plans to improve the school pond and to raise money for Sport Relief.

p.7

Leadership and management

School leaders and the governing body have been successful over the last two years in maintaining above-average attainment by the time pupils leave Year 6. This has been partly achieved by driving improvements to the provision for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs and the teaching and learning of reading and writing. Since the previous inspection, leaders have rigorously ensured pupils’ safety and positive attitudes to learning, even when teaching has not been above satisfactory. Improvements have continued even though school leaders and the governing body have had to manage unexpected leadership difficulties last year. Consequently, the school demonstrates satisfactory capacity for sustained improvement. Nearly all the parents and carers agree that they would recommend this school to others. However, a few expressed concerns, particularly about the quality of communication in the past. Recent initiatives to improve communication

p.7

Leadership and management

have been effective; the large majority of parents and carers agree that the school Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

keeps them well informed. Parents and carers also report that they have high expectations for the school under the leadership of the new headteacher. However, it is too early to judge the impact of his work.

p.8

Leadership and management

The headteacher has swiftly identified the improvements to be made to provision and outcomes and has sensibly prioritised the steps to take in the early stages of his leadership. For example, he has reviewed all the safeguarding procedures and policies to ensure that they are up to date and effective. Inspectors agree that they are effective in ensuring that pupils, including the few whose circumstances may make them vulnerable, are kept safe. In addition, tolerance of others is promoted effectively and records show that there have been no incidences of discrimination in recent years. Another development made by the headteacher has been the strengthening of the procedures to track the pupils’ progress. While, currently, the impact of these procedures is not apparent, the school is better placed to ensure pupils are making good progress and that teachers and school leaders can be more effectively held to account for the progress of the pupils by the governing body. The

p.8

Leadership and management

school leaders and governing body recognise that team working and middle leadership are underdeveloped across the school, as is the opportunity to share the elements of good teaching that exist. Consequently, leaders are actively implementing improvements, although outcomes cannot yet be evaluated.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum is satisfactory overall and it is helpful in promoting pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Occasionally, aspects of pupils’ personal development are well promoted – for example, in developing their cultural understanding in science. Pupils have access to a suitable range of clubs and enrichment activities that add enjoyment to their learning. One stronger feature is the opportunity provided for many of them to play a musical instrument. Another strong feature is the before-and-after school provision that pupils benefit from. Not only are pupils well cared for, but they are encouraged to pursue interests and activities that are linked to what they learn in lessons. An improving feature of the curriculum is the provision for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs. Now the school can demonstrate that the equality of opportunity of pupils is satisfactory as all groups currently make the nationally expected progress.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Chinley Primary School, High Peak SK23 6DR

Thank you for the help you gave us when we visited your school. You made us feel very welcome. If you remember, we came to look at the work that you were doing and to talk to you and your teachers. You are well behaved and are kind and considerate to each other. We think that you could take even more responsibility for jobs in school as well as for improving your work. You told us how much you enjoyed coming to school and liked to go on trips and visits, especially the ones where you stay overnight. In lessons, most of you try your best and we are pleased that when you move to your secondary schools you have well-developed English and mathematics skills. We think that some of you could do even better, particularly those of you that find your work quite easy.

p.11

Inspection of Chinley Primary School, High Peak SK23 6DR

You get a good start to school when you are in the Nursery and Reception classes. Your teachers take good care of you and your new headteacher wants to make improvements to your education.

p.11

Inspection of Chinley Primary School, High Peak SK23 6DR

Considering everything, we decided that yours is a satisfactory school.

p.11

Inspection of Chinley Primary School, High Peak SK23 6DR

We have asked your school to do the following.

p.11

Inspection of Chinley Primary School, High Peak SK23 6DR

 Make sure that you all make faster progress by improving the teaching in some of your lessons and giving you better advice on how to improve your work.  Ensure that the headteacher, teachers and the governing body work well together to improve your education further.

p.11

Inspection of Chinley Primary School, High Peak SK23 6DR

Tim Bristow Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion