Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Cornwall Council in Cornwall

Inspected 19 Jan 2012 · published 23 Feb 2012 · URN SC040491

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janice Hawtin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 Jan 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Janice Hawtin

  • URN verified

    SC040491

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 25% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisedelay

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings57w0
  • What needs to improve175w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
227
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 84%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC040491 Inspection date 19/01/2012 Inspector Janice Hawtin Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 11/08/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.3

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Brief description of the service

The home is operated by a local authority and provides short-break care for up to six children and young people with a learning disability or combined learning and physical disability. The home operates for five nights each week spanning Wednesday through to Monday morning, with a maximum of six places per night. Packages of care vary in length and frequency. Most children stay for one night at a time but others stay for weekends. Where possible children stay in the room they are familiar with and with children of similar needs and interests. The building is single storey, providing level access. Enclosed play areas are provided outdoors where children receive support to access a range of play equipment.

p.4

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress.

p.4

Progress

At the full inspection in August 2011, the overall quality rating for the home was judged to be good with outstanding judgements in outcomes for children and young people and the quality of care. Two requirements and three recommendations were made to further improve the overall quality and standards of care.

p.4

Progress

The home continues to demonstrate some improvements in the outcomes for children and young people and the quality of care provided. One requirement and one recommendation from the previous inspection have been successfully addressed to benefit children and young people. Some attention has been paid to the remaining requirement and recommendations but these have yet to be fully addressed. One further requirement is made as a result of this inspection.

p.4

Progress

Records for each child and young person now include the statutory provision under which the accommodation is provided. The staff are clear about the legal status of children and young people and it's implication for the care provided.

p.4

Progress

The use of sanctions is rare in this environment where praise, encouragement and rewards are commonly used to affect changes in difficult behaviour. Since the last inspection two have been used and the records now include the views of children and young people. In both cases including these views has evidenced the effectiveness of the sanction and helped individuals take some responsibility for their behaviour.

p.4

Progress

This service continues to improve outcomes for children and young people, working in consultation with parents and schools to maximise potential for development. There are notable improvements in communication and independence skills. Recording of targets and progress for each child and young person is improving planning, focusing work, and provides evidence of continuing developments. Recording has also improved with the employment of an administration worker which has impacted on reducing the burden of paperwork on care staff. Access to the local authority recording systems, which can also be updated by care staff has improved communication between professionals and up to date information is readily available to inform practice.

p.4

Progress

The quality of staff training proves effective in contributing to the development of this service. There is a newly appointed co-ordinator of 'team teach' the programme used to deal with difficult behaviour and making sure any physical interventions are safe to use and protect children and young people from significant harm. Staff can now access training very quickly and can practise techniques in staff meetings to improve competence.

p.5

Progress

The team manager has completed a coaching and mentoring award and the deputy manager a registered managers’ award. Both have undertaken further training in the professional supervision of staff. Whilst some of this learning has yet to be fully embedded in practice some changes in supporting staff and improving the quality of supervision have been made.

p.5

Progress

Parents continue to be pleased with the service and support received. One parent reported that the home continues to exceed her expectations and that her children thrive in this environment, ‘they can’t wait to get in the door’.

p.5

Progress

Access to the internet is not currently available to support education and provide some of the older young people access to social networking sites allowing them to keep in touch with friends and family. This recommendation has yet to be successfully addressed. Some progress has been made, a laptop and computer are on order and arrangements are in place to connect these to the internet. Additional resources will be purchased to allow those with physical or learning difficulties to make best use of these facilities once they are in place.

p.5

Progress

A written policy which supports the use of electronic monitoring equipment has not been created. Staff can describe the practice around the use of this equipment. It is not used indiscriminately but following accessed need and consent from parents. This provides some protection from what could be intrusive surveillance. For some young people the use of this equipment protects their safety and welfare. The current practice is not formalised in a written policy document which would inform young people, parents and other stakeholders.

p.5

Progress

A recommendation to apply fire retention devices to the door between the kitchen and dinning room has only been met in part; this does not yet fully meet fire safety standards as there is no closure device fitted. The team manager now has a date for this to be fitted and the recommendation will apply until this work is completed.

p.5

Progress

Since the last inspection the registered person has not notified Ofsted without delay of an event listed in Schedule 5 of the regulations. This compromises the system put in place to monitor the quality of care and safety of children and young people. Regulation 33 reports contain some improvement since the last inspection and now have detail of date and time of the visit. The most recent reports are easier to read and contain more detail and analysis of the quality of care provided. However the majority lack any discussion with young people, their parents or social workers, missing an opportunity for consultation and independent verification of the quality of care provided.

p.5

Progress

This home continues to provide a warm and welcoming environment, children and young people benefit from an enthusiastic and attentive staff team.

p.6

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.6

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) notify Ofsted without delay any events listed in column 1 of Schedule 5 (Regulation 30 (1)) 20/01/2012

p.6

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure that the person carrying out Regulation 33 visits interviews children, their parents and persons working at the home in order to form an opinion of the care provided. (Regulation 33 (4)(a)) 23/02/2012

p.6

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.6

Recommendations

 create a written policy which supports the use of any electronic monitoring equipment (NMS 10.5)  provide internet access to young people to increase the range of educational resources which support and promote learning and allows access to social networking sites within the bounds of e-safety (NMS 4.4)  ensure that the door between the kitchen and dining area meets fire safety standards. (NMS 10.9)

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion