Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Feb 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Rodgers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Rodgers

  • Postcode verified

    CR9 1TP

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyvery highconfidently
Criticismdeclining

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings395w+42
  • What needs to improve100w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
489
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms C Dunn Head of Learning CALAT London Borough of Croydon Adult and Community Learning Taberner House Park Lane Croydon CR9 1TP

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on 30 and 31 January 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and participants; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of participants’ work; and observation of three learning sessions and initial assessment and guidance sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 The London Borough of Croydon’s Adult Learning and Training (CALAT) has developed a wide range of courses for unemployed adults that supports its key priorities well. Participants’ current and future development needs are met particularly well and course take-up is very high. Participants have good opportunities to develop their confidence in literacy, numeracy and language skills alongside vocational and employability skills.  In the observed teaching and learning sessions, tutors promoted and reinforced work-related skills and professional standards very effectively. Participants developed good communication and teamworking skills. Participants on English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) courses gained a wider vocabulary relevant to applying for jobs, which they used confidently when speaking and writing. Participants regularly receive constructive feedback from tutors about their progress which improves

p.1

Key findings

their confidence in their own ability.  CALAT has developed good links with public sector employers, who they consult with when designing courses. Most of CALAT’s vocational courses incorporate work-placements which give participants highly relevant occupational experiences and learning. However, the number of employers offering work-placements is declining and CALAT works with only a few from the private sector.  Staff discuss participants’ learning needs, their motivation and barriers in detail. CALAT provides good pastoral, practical and support in literacy and numeracy that enables participants to learn effectively. Participants have appropriate personal and learning goals, but these rarely include career goals.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 agreeing and setting with participants their career goals and actions to address barriers to employment  working with a wider range of employers to involve them more in course design and support participants with work experience, work trials and enrichment.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at London Borough of Croydon.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion