Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Norton Community Primary School

Inspected 24 Jan 2012 · published 14 Feb 2012 · URN 121456

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jan 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Nancy Walker, Sue Eland, Tony Painter

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Norton Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    121456

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 17% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivestrongimprovedextremelygood progressvery welloutstanding
Criticisminadequatenot consistentlyshortcomingsweaknessesconcernsbelowlackgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1733w+64
  • Leadership441w+66
  • What needs to improve56w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,221
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Norton Community Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 23–24 January 2012 Inspection number 380246 Unique Reference Number 121456 Local authority North Yorkshire Inspection number 380246 Inspection dates 23–24 January 2012 Lead inspector Tony Painter

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 441 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mark Weatherill Headteacher Liz Parker Date of previous school inspection 24 June 2009 School address Grove Street Norton Malton YO17 9BG Telephone number 01653 692104 Fax number 01653 696284 Email address admin@norton-pri.n-yorks.sch.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.1

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.2

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

Tony Painter Nancy Walker Additional inspector Additional inspector Sue Eland Additional inspector

p.3

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. The inspectors observed teaching and learning in 32 lessons or parts of lessons taught by 17 teachers and held discussions with groups of pupils, the vice-chair of the governing body, staff and the headteacher. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a wide range of school documents including records of planning and assessment, and tracking and safeguarding policies. They examined staff and pupil questionnaire responses as well as 164 questionnaires returned by parents and carers. Inspectors looked at the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) but no responses were recorded.

p.3

Information about the school

This school is well above the average size for primary schools and most pupils are of White British heritage. Very few pupils come from minority ethnic backgrounds or speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is broadly average. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is below the national average. The school meets the current government floor standards. There have been considerable changes in the teaching staff since the previous inspection. The school has Healthy Schools status. It has gained Activemark and Eco Schools Silver awards. It provides Early Years Foundation Stage provision in Nursery and Reception classes. A Children’s Centre adjoins the school and is subject to a separate inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key Findings

 This is a good school. A positive atmosphere of care and support ensures pupils grow in confidence and mature well. Parents and carers have positive views of all the school provides. Pupils behave well and have great confidence that staff will support them if ever they have concerns.

p.4

Key Findings

 Pupils achieve well from starting points that are below those typical for their ages. In recent years, attainment has risen and pupils’ progress now exceeds nationally expected rates of progress. By the time they leave school, pupils’ attainment overall is broadly average.

p.4

Key Findings

 Teaching is good throughout the school. It ensures effective learning and helps most pupils to gain skills, knowledge and understanding at a good rate. New assessment systems are giving a clear view of how well pupils are doing and focusing teaching well. As a result, progress is accelerating but teachers do not consistently apply the systems with sufficient precision, particularly when meeting the needs of some lower- attaining pupils. Although teachers have generally high expectations, they do not consistently pay enough attention to ensuring that pupils’ presentation of their work is of the best quality.

p.4

Key Findings

 Teachers establish very good relationships that effectively motivate pupils of all abilities to try their best. Classroom organisation is strong and this generally ensures little time is lost; in the best lessons learning is very brisk. Skilful questioning frequently extends pupils’ learning well. Pupils respond very positively and say lessons are becoming more interesting and challenging.

p.4

Key Findings

 The headteacher’s thorough self-assessment has correctly identified the school’s relative shortcomings. Rapid and appropriate action, although at a relatively early stage, is showing positive impact. Good leadership has established a strong team approach. All school staff and the governing body are working together effectively to raise further the quality of teaching and outcomes for pupils.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure teaching is consistently good or better and thus raise achievement further by:  sharing the best teaching practice currently evident within the school  refining and sharpening the use of assessment information to match tasks to the needs of some lower-attaining pupils  ensuring that consistent attention is paid to high-quality presentation of work.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils enjoy learning throughout the school. In the best lessons, for example in Year 6, there is a tangible atmosphere of excitement. Older pupils say that their lessons have improved in recent years and that lessons are more challenging and more interesting. Pupils’ good behaviour and positive attitudes make a significant contribution to learning. Pupils generally pay good attention to teachers. They are enthusiastic and are keen to join in and answer questions. For example, a Year 3 teacher captivated pupils with a demonstration of the working of the heart; pupils were extremely keen to link this to their knowledge of how to keep healthy. Pupils generally respond quickly to the consistent classroom routines, apply themselves well to tasks and concentrate hard. Pupils enjoy opportunities to use their basic skills in an increasingly wide range of well-focused activities. Lower-attaining Year 6 pupils, for example, applied themselves extremely well to a set of

p.5

Achievement of pupils

number problems linked to their study of evacuations during World War II.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils join the school with skills that are generally below those typical for their age. They make good overall progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage and through the school, although some weaknesses in older pupils’ attainment, resulting from past underachievement, remain. End of Key Stage 2 test results are broadly average but have improved over the past three years, most notably in English. Almost all parents and carers reflect this and say that their children are making good progress. Pupils’ reading standards by the end of Key Stage 1 and by the time they leave the school are broadly average.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The school’s accurate tracking systems show that pupils of all abilities make good overall progress. Increasing numbers of higher-attaining pupils are exceeding the national expectations for their ages. The school’s predictions for the 2012 Key Stage 2 tests show continuing improvement. Effective support for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs ensures that they take a full part in lessons and also make good progress. Targeted interventions to support lower-attaining pupils are very effective. School tracking data show that some, but not all, lower-attaining pupils are making very good progress and that any gaps in attainment are closing securely.

p.5

Quality of teaching

Teaching is good. This confirms parents’ and carers’ overwhelmingly positive views. In lessons teachers generally establish very good relationships with pupils, so that pupils are positive about learning. They show enjoyment of learning, work hard and concentrate well. Secure classroom organisation means pupils know what they need to do. This contributes to the good pace of learning. Pupils behave well and little time is lost to behaviour management. Teachers frequently make effective use of a wide range of resources to motivate and involve pupils. For example, much teaching makes good use of prepared resources on the interactive whiteboards and, in the best lessons, teachers use these very creatively to fire pupils’ enthusiasm.

p.5

Quality of teaching

Teachers’ good subject knowledge and increasingly effective use of the school’s improved assessment systems aid planning and support improved teaching. Lesson plans identify outcomes and tasks for pupils of different abilities, in many cases matched very well to pupils’ abilities and learning styles. Where this is particularly effective, teachers set precise objectives and ensure that activities allow pupils of all abilities to remain focused on what they are learning and to make rapid progress. In many lessons, teaching is successful in challenging higher-attaining pupils and this supports their good progress. However, in some lessons, matching tasks to pupils’ abilities is somewhat less accurate and teaching does not take full account of what some lower-attaining pupils are able to do. For example, some pupils’ progress towards the lesson’s identified objective is restricted because their limited

p.6

Quality of teaching

writing skills act as a brake on their progress.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Recent measures to improve the consistency of teaching are improving the continuity of pupils’ learning. Good systematic teaching of letter sounds and phonics in the Early Years Foundation Stage and with older pupils is accelerating pupils’ progress in reading and early writing skills. Teachers give older pupils good opportunities to develop necessary skills to compose, edit and improve their writing. Pupils apply these across the curriculum. For example, in Year 4 pupils have written extended and thoughtful responses to learning about the Blitz. Some pupils’ work is very well presented, including some writing that makes good use of information and communication technology. However, teachers do not consistently promote sufficiently high standards of presentation, which often falls below the overall quality of the work.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Parents, carers and pupils all say that pupils’ behaviour is good and are positive about pupils’ safety in school. Evidence gathered during the inspection supports these positive views of behaviour over time. Pupils are polite and follow instructions well. Their good behaviour in lessons makes a clear contribution to the school’s positive learning ethos. Pupils have a generally good understanding of the actions they can take to ensure they remain safe. For example, most pupils recognise how to deal with potential risks associated with new technologies and social networking. Attendance is broadly average and improving. Pupils’ punctuality to school and to lessons is good.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils show increasingly effective personal and social skills, such as independence and self- esteem. From the Early Years Foundation Stage classes on, pupils are encouraged to take responsibility and work together. Throughout the school they generally share resources sensibly, listen carefully to each other and understand the importance of respecting the views of others. However, some pupils lack the highest levels of self-reliance and rely on adults to manage simple parts of classroom life such as getting pencils out ready for work.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils say they have confidence in the school’s systems to encourage and support good behaviour. Pupils show their good moral understanding through considerate behaviour and sense of fairness. Pupils understand the nature of different forms of bullying but say it is so rare that it does not concern them. Nonetheless, they have total confidence that staff would help if necessary, an opinion also expressed by many parents and carers. Over time, inappropriate conduct, including bullying, has been extremely rare and there are no recent recorded racist incidents.

p.6

Leadership and management

The headteacher has carefully monitored the school and accurately identified the most important areas for development, setting out an ambitious vision for improvements. Leadership has successfully involved and empowered staff at all levels. It has built an effective team with strong shared values. As a result, staff and the governing body are working together well to enhance provision and improve the progress of all pupils. Effective action has begun to widen the management roles of coordinators and governors, although this remains at a relatively early stage of development.

p.7

Leadership and management

The good curriculum provides a broad range of activities for pupils of all abilities. Overall it meets pupils’ needs and enables them to make good progress. The use of thematic work in the curriculum is growing. It gives increasing opportunities for pupils to link their learning in different subjects. This work successfully catches the interest of boys and promotes their learning. Teachers’ shared approaches are raising pupils’ self-confidence and helping them to achieve better. Pupils take part in a good range of practical and physical activities and they speak with enthusiasm about the wide range of extra-curricular activities, especially sports. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Lessons include good opportunities for pupils to reflect on their feelings and how to interact with others and the world around them. Leaders ensure that the school takes effective action to promote

p.7

Leadership and management

equality and tackle discrimination. Leaders and managers ensure that safeguarding requirements are met fully.

p.7

Leadership and management

The headteacher’s detailed and accurate self-evaluation gives a strong foundation for developments and improving teaching to accelerate progress. The plan has led to quick and effective action, successfully bringing together new and existing staff into a cohesive unit. This has resulted in cooperative approaches developing rapidly. Effective training gives teachers confidence to embrace change and work together well. Actions, for example the effective use of improved assessment systems, are already showing a positive impact in lessons and on pupils’ outcomes. The shared commitment and vision and the positive impact of the actions already taken demonstrate the school’s strong capacity to continue to improve.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.8

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils' punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils' freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.9

to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main

findings from the inspection of their school.

p.10

Inspection of Norton Community Primary School, Malton, YO17 9BG

I would like to thank you all for making the inspectors so welcome when we came to your school. I should also like to say a special ‘thank you’ to those of you who gave up time to talk to us about your work. You told us that your school is good and getting even better at helping you to learn. We agree with you. You work hard, behave well and get on well together. You are right to be proud of what you achieve.

p.10

Inspection of Norton Community Primary School, Malton, YO17 9BG

Yours is a good school. All the adults in school are good at caring for you and they keep you safe. The headteacher and staff are working hard to improve things to help you learn better and this is successful. Good teaching is giving you many interesting things to do. We saw how you really enjoy lessons and how you are keen to learn. As a result, you are making good progress although some of you who find learning a bit harder need a bit more support. We have asked the teachers to think carefully about what they are asking you to do so that you can make even better progress.

p.10

Inspection of Norton Community Primary School, Malton, YO17 9BG

We noticed that some of your work is not set out as neatly as it could be. Sometimes that causes problems, such as when older children try to add up numbers that are not in line. So we have also asked your teachers to pay more attention to getting you to present your work well.

p.10

Inspection of Norton Community Primary School, Malton, YO17 9BG

I am confident that you will help by continuing to do your very best in all you do, including making your work as neat as you can!

p.10

Inspection of Norton Community Primary School, Malton, YO17 9BG

Tony Painter Lead Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion