Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Inspected 25 Jan 2012 · published 10 Feb 2012 · URN 103424

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jan 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Ian Jones, Jennifer Taylor, Keith Sadler

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    103424

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositivegood progresseffectivemake good progressstrongconsistentlyexcellent
Criticisminadequatenot sufficientlyweakinconsistenciesnot alwaysconcernlowlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1802w+55
  • Leadership407w+38
  • What needs to improve74w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,267
shorter than usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 24–25 January 2012 Inspection number 376902 Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 103424 Local authority Birmingham Inspection number 376902 Inspection dates 24–25 January 2012 Lead inspector Keith Sadler

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 404 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Father Paul Devaney Headteacher Barry Desmond Date of previous school inspection 17 March 2009 School address Lyttelton Road Stechford Birmingham B33 8BL Telephone number 0121 6752784 Fax number 0121 6751961 Email address enquiry@corpuschristi.bham.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Inspectors observed 25 lessons led by 16 different teachers or practitioners. The inspectors held meetings with members of the governing body, staff, parents and carers, and groups of pupils. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work and looked at a wide range of documentation. This included the school’s analysis of pupils’ progress, teachers’ lesson plans, the school development plan, leaders’ monitoring records and pupils’ work. Questionnaires from 124 parents and carers, from staff and from pupils in Key Stage 2 were analysed and their responses taken into account.

p.3

Information about the school

Corpus Christi is a large primary school. Most of the pupils live within the immediate vicinity though the school is one of two that serves the parish in Stetchford. About half of the pupils are of White British heritage and the remainder are from a wide range of minority ethnic backgrounds. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above average though only a few are at an early stage of learning English. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is high. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities is average. The school meets the current government floor standard. The school has gained Healthy Schools status and has been awarded the silver Sports Activemark. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school. The headteacher’s effective leadership and dedication to improvement are shared by the staff and the governing body. All are committed to gaining the best provision and outcomes for pupils. Parents and carers recognise these strengths and they are almost unanimous in their support.

p.4

Key findings

 The governing body supports the school well. However, its members are over- reliant on the headteacher for information.

p.4

Key findings

 Achievement overall, and especially in mathematics and writing, has improved since the previous inspection and is now good. Pupils make good progress in all year groups from low starting points. Year 6 pupils are on course to attain above-average standards in English and mathematics. However, there are inconsistencies in pupils’ presentation of work and in their handwriting.

p.4

Key findings

 The school has a warm, welcoming and stimulating environment where pupils feel cared for and safe, and are ready to learn. Their behaviour is good and their attitudes positive.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is good. Teachers invariably provide interesting and exciting activities that capture the pupils’ interest because lessons are generally planned well to meet the varying learning needs of the pupils. Occasionally, work is not sufficiently challenging for more-able pupils. Teachers’ use of assessment is good and they are particularly effective in ensuring that pupils have a clear understanding of what they need to do to move to the next step in their learning.

p.4

Key findings

 Due to the resolve and determination of the headteacher and senior staff, a concerted approach to school improvement has resulted in improvements in key areas since the last inspection, including teaching and learning and more effective procedures for checking provision and pupils’ progress. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Lift the quality of teaching and learning from good to outstanding by:  improving pupils’ presentation of their work in mathematics and their handwriting in English  ensuring that teachers’ plans consistently provide challenging work for all groups of pupils, particularly the more able.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By July 2012, reduce the governing body’s reliance on the headteacher by instigating a systematic programme of school visits to obtain first-hand information about provision and school performance.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

On entry to the Reception class, children’s skills and abilities are much lower than expected levels. Because teaching is consistently effective and an excellent emphasis is placed on providing a secure and inclusive environment, children thrive in their learning in the two Reception classes. Even so, a minority reach the expected goals on entry to Year 1.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Almost all parents and carers confirm that they believe that their children are making good progress in their learning and that the school helps their children to develop their basic skills well. This view is accurate. The inspection found that progress in reading, writing and mathematics is good for all groups of pupils and it is accelerating throughout the school. The many pupils that enter Year 1 with below average proficiency in speaking and listening make particularly good progress in their communication skills because the staff in Years 1 and 2 successfully boost them in most lessons. Staff ensure that there are many opportunities to talk with partners and in small groups and this accelerates the pupils’ expressive language well. This approach is complemented by the rigorous and effective programme to build pupils’ sounds and letters skills, and this also aids their good progress in reading and

p.5

Achievement of pupils

writing. As a result, pupils in Year 2 consistently work at age-related expectations and attainment is average.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In Key Stage 2, progress in reading continues to be strong and, by the time that they leave school, pupils’ attainment is above average. Pupils in Year 5 say that they enjoy reading, and they are competent in comprehension, particularly in drawing inference from the texts they are studying. In writing, pupils’ achievement in the past has been no better than satisfactory. However, the school’s concerted effort to lift achievement in writing has been successful and standards for current Year 5 and 6 pupils are above average. For example, a small minority of Year 6 pupils have already reached the higher level expected at the end of Year 6. In addition, a few of the more-able Year 5 pupils have attained the expected standard in writing at the Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

end of Year 6. However, some middle ability pupils’ progress in Years 3 to 6 is hampered by their weak handwriting skills.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

In mathematics, the curriculum to develop pupils’ calculation skills is good and this leads to almost all pupils working at age-related levels. Year 5 pupils, for example, successfully explained their method and reasoning when tackling ratio problems. These more-able pupils demonstrated well how their speaking and listening skills have been developed by the time they reach upper Key Stage 2. Their mathematical vocabulary was good and they enjoyed the challenging tasks provided. Even so, across the school, pupils’ presentation of mathematics is relatively weak and this hinders the progress of some pupils. A good programme of support for pupils who are an early stage of learning English enables these pupils to make good progress. Similarly, a wide-ranging programme of withdrawal groups ensures that disabled pupils and those with special educational needs also make good progress.

p.6

Quality of teaching

There has been a considerable improvement in the quality of teaching. Almost all teaching is now good and this leads to pupils enjoying learning and making good progress. As one Year 5 pupil said, ‘Our teachers are really clever. They understand how to help us to meet our targets.’ Teachers manage the pupils well and ensure that relationships are positive. Consequently, there is a calm and purposeful atmosphere in all classes. A marked improvement in the teachers’ use of assessment has both helped the pupils to become more independent learners and also to be clear about the purposes and expected outcomes of lessons. Most of all, pupils are provided with clear and precise targets and their next steps in learning are set well, supported by thorough and comprehensive marking of their work. Activities are now matched much better to pupils’ needs and generally work is challenging. However, some inconsistencies remain because in some classes, teachers do not always ensure

p.6

Quality of teaching

that work for the most able is hard enough. A marked improvement in the quality of tracking of pupils’ progress provides a rich range of data and these are used well both to identify any pupils that are in danger of slipping behind and also to help teachers to group pupils more effectively. It is the relentless determination of senior staff to improve teaching that has led to improvements in learning for all groups of pupils. This is recognised by parents and carers, who were almost unanimous in stating that their children are taught well.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Paired and small group learning supports pupils’ personal skills well and has a positive impact on developing pupils’ social development. Their spiritual, moral, and cultural development is also promoted well by the themes and topics taught. Work in literacy and numeracy is increasingly planned across the curriculum. This results in pupils being enabled to practise these skills in history, geography and science lessons. For example, Year 5 pupils spoke enthusiastically about their visit to the Botanical Gardens and this gave rise to high quality recounts of the visit as well as report writing on the parts of flowers.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils thoroughly enjoy school and learning. Pupils’ good behaviour reported in the previous inspection has been maintained with pupils behaving well both in lessons and around the school. Even though some pupils have social and emotional difficulties, they are managed well and the good programme of support enables these pupils to play a full part in lessons. Pupils who may have a concern are confident that all the adults will help them. Pupils say that they feel safe in school. and that the rare incidences of bullying of any kind are dealt with well. The school’s explicit principles ensure that there is a positive and welcoming ethos. The good levels of pastoral support ensure that there is sensitive support for pupils and families whose challenging circumstances may make them vulnerable. A number of parents and carers made appreciative comments about how the school had helped them through times of difficulty. Parents and carers reflect the pupils’ positive views

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

and they are almost unanimous in saying that their children are kept safe in school.

p.7

Leadership and management

There has been a marked improvement in leadership and management. Previously, many of the subject leaders were new to post and their role in supporting the school’s monitoring and evaluation procedures was not sufficiently well developed. This is no longer the case. Senior leaders work closely together as a team and all the staff share a common vision based on improving provision and pupils’ progress. Procedures to check provision and pupils’ progress are comprehensive and robust and they lead to accurate evaluations which, in turn, are used well to inform the high-quality school development plan. Teamwork is strong and staff morale high because all the staff know that their views and opinions are valued. Well-targeted professional development, complemented by a programme of individual support, has improved teaching. Improvements in teaching, pupils’ progress and leadership and management demonstrate the school’s strong capacity for further improvement.

p.7

Leadership and management

Governance is satisfactory. Although some members of the governing body make regular visits to the school, these are not sufficiently systematic and this limits the governing body’s capacity to challenge the school to make further improvements. However, along with senior leaders, the governing body ensures that regulatory requirements for safeguarding and protecting pupils are met.

p.7

Leadership and management

The quality of the curriculum is good. The themed approach to learning provides a good range of activities that the pupils thoroughly enjoy. The curriculum is enriched well with visits and trips. The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Pupils’ understanding of multicultural Britain is enhanced by trips to a mosque and a Buddhist temple where pupils enjoyed a meditation session. The school is a harmonious community in which others’ feelings and values are respected well. Equality is promoted well and discrimination of any kind is not tolerated. Pupils’ social and moral development is promoted by the good quality personal and social programme supporting pupils’ understanding of their actions.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.8

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.8

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.9

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.10

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School, Birmingham, B33 8BL

Thank you for making us so welcome when we came to inspect your school. We enjoyed hearing about the many things that you enjoy in your school. I was particularly impressed to see your website and read your blogs and also to see all the photographs of the royal wedding last year. Yours is a good school. Your teachers work hard to make lessons interesting and they plan lots of exciting activities for you to do. This helps you to make good progress in your learning. Those of you who find learning hard make good progress, as do those of you who are learning English as an additional language. This is because you are supported so well.

p.10

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School, Birmingham, B33 8BL

You told us that your school is a happy place and that the adults look after you really well. We agree with you and so do your parents and carers. We were impressed by how well you get on together. Your behaviour is good and you feel safe in school. We think that your headteacher does a good job and he is greatly helped by all the staff. They are always checking on how well you are doing because they want you always to do as well as you can.

p.10

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School, Birmingham, B33 8BL

Even in a good school like yours, there are things to improve. We have asked your teachers to make sure that your handwriting improves and also your presentation of work, particularly in your mathematics books. We have also asked your teachers to make sure that when they plan your lessons, the work is always challenging for you, particularly for those of you who learn quickly. Finally, we have asked that members of the governing body should come and visit your lessons more often so that they can find out for themselves how well you are doing.

p.10

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School, Birmingham, B33 8BL

We really enjoyed our time in your school. Thank you for taking time to talk to us and letting us watch your lessons. You can help to make your school even better by continuing to work hard towards your targets.

p.10

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School, Birmingham, B33 8BL

Keith Sadler Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion