Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by 3 Dimensions Care Limited in Somerset
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Jan 2012
- Inspectors verified
Jim Palmer
- URN verified
SC060758
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that where any sanctions, disciplinary measures or restraint are used, children are encouraged to have their views recorded and sign the records kept by the home (NMS 3.18) p.6
- ensure that the liberty of children is not routinely restricted and no form of secure accommodation is used unless the home is an approved secure children's home, notably by the use of internally locked doors and window restraints where there is no risk of falling, such as on ground floor windows. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 256
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC060758 Inspection date 10/01/2012 Inspector Jim Palmer Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 15/06/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
The home provides care and accommodation for up to five young people aged from 11 years to 17 years, who may have emotional and behavioural problems. Some young people may also have specific learning disabilities; in particular, autism.
p.4
Brief description of the service
This home is on the edge of a rural village within easy driving distance of a small town. The house is divided into two areas. Young people are accommodated in the part of the home that best meets their needs.
p.4
Brief description of the service
There are gardens and a number of outbuildings. These provide a school, a gym, workshop facilities and company offices. The school has undergone considerable construction work to provide additional space and facilities.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
Some young people enjoy living in the home. Not all young people share that view. All, however, say that they like most staff members and thought that staff worked hard to promote their interests. Young people say that staff help them to resolve any personal matters they have.
p.4
Progress
Some young people say that they have only a limited ability to influence the house rules and consider some practices are unnecessarily restrictive. While these rules may promote young people's safety, they also inhibit their ability to take managed risks and develop greater personal responsibility.
p.4
Progress
Since the last inspection, the staff and managers have worked hard to implement the requirements and recommendations they were asked to complete.
p.4
Progress
The use of any restraint, sanction or measure of discipline is well recorded and regularly monitored by managers. This also includes any searches of young people's rooms and property. All incidents of any such practice are recorded as part of the manager's monitoring of the quality of the service, and proposed strategies are detailed in those records. The records of the use of any restraint provide a detailed description of the behaviour that led to the application of restraint. Advice to staff is clear in that they may only apply physical restraint as a last resort if there is a serious risk of harm to themselves or others.
p.4
Progress
Young people are invited and encouraged to express their comments following the use of any restraint or sanction. However, not all young people take up this opportunity. On occasions staff express the young person's view on their behalf. This is not made clear in the record and there is no evidence whether the comments reflect the young person's view. The home is seeking ways of remedying this.
p.4
Progress
The home has reviewed all policies relating to the use of restraint, control and discipline including room searches. These policies are also repeated in the Statement of Purpose. All staff spoken to were clear about the practice guidelines and operate within them. The number of restraints and room searches has reduced since the last inspection.
p.5
Progress
Room and property searches are now conducted on a risk-led basis following discussion with placing social workers and parents, in order to keep the young person or others safe. However, some young people and staff find this can be counter productive.
p.5
Progress
Young people are supported in developing the life skills they need to make a successful transition into adulthood. The home operates as two self-contained units at either end of the building, one of which is a designated semi-independent unit. Young people who are of sufficient age and ability are encouraged to manage a weekly budget, plan a menu and shop for themselves. Some take responsibility for making personal appointments such as medical appointments and, subject to risk assessments, to manage own medication. Young people say that they receive sufficient support and guidance to provide them with the skills they need. Some young people say that their level of independence and age is not always reflected in the daily routine of the home, for example, bedtimes.
p.5
Progress
Despite this the home operates high levels of security, with internal doors between parts of the building remaining locked. Locked external doors that require a key to unlock them from the inside, as well as window restrictors, are in place on the ground floor and bedroom windows as a matter of routine. This can be overly restrictive and prevent exit from the home.
p.5
Progress
The home has made good progress in implementing the two requirements and six recommendations arising from the previous inspection and has a good track record in improving the quality of the service and using previous inspection comments as a learning experience.
p.5
Progress
Despite the progress made since the last inspection, three areas of weakness remain. Staff recruitment practice is weak in that applicants are invited to work shadow shifts prior to all required checks being completed. This may place children at risk. The home is exceeding the powers it has to keep children safe by restricting young people's liberty. The views of young people recorded in the records of restraints and sanctions, are not always easily verified as the young person's statements.
p.5
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.5
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure that the registered person shall not allow a person to work in a children's home unless that person is fit to work at a children's home, namely that full and satisfactory information in respect of all matters in Schedule 2 is held. (Regulation 26(2) (3)). 31/01/2012
p.6
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.6
Recommendations
ensure that where any sanctions, disciplinary measures or restraint are used, children are encouraged to have their views recorded and sign the records kept by the home (NMS 3.18) ensure that the liberty of children is not routinely restricted and no form of secure accommodation is used unless the home is an approved secure children's home, notably by the use of internally locked doors and window restraints where there is no risk of falling, such as on ground floor windows. (Children Act 1989 Guidance and Regulations Volume 5 Paragraphs 2.107 and 2.109) (NMS 3.19).
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion