Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Herefordshire Pupil Referral Service

Inspected 18 Jan 2012 · published 6 Feb 2012 · URN 130991

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Jan 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Michael Farrell

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HR1 2DY

  • Name on report verified

    St David's Pupil Referral Unit

  • URN verified

    130991

Page 4 of 12
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progresshigh expectationsvery wellimprovedexcellentpositivestrong
Criticisminadequatemissedfailureseriouslylackerrorslowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1742w+79
  • Leadership559w+42
  • What needs to improve39w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,331
about usual (typical 2677)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 14–16 Inspection date(s) 17–18 January 2012 Inspection number 381288 St David's Pupil Referral Unit Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 130991 Local authority Herefordshire Inspection number 381288 Inspection dates 17–18 January 2012 Lead inspector Michael Farrell

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Pupil referral unit School category Pupil referral unit Age range of pupils 14–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 31 Appropriate authority The local authority Headteacher Paul Barns Date of previous school inspection 1 October 2008 School address Coningsby Street Hereford HR1 2DY Telephone number 01432 274485 Fax number 01432 351695 Email address admin@st-davids.hereford.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. During the inspection, eight lessons were observed on the centre site, the hospital site, at venues used by external providers and at students’ homes, comprising five hours teaching. Eight teachers/ tutors were seen. Meetings were held with a group of students, staff, the chair of the management committee and a representative of the local authority. The inspector noted there were no responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View), observed the pupil referral unit’s work and looked at a range of documents including those relating to safeguarding, assessments of students’ progress, and development planning, and scrutinised nine parental questionnaires.

p.3

Information about the school

St David’s offers provision for students experiencing a range of difficulties preventing them attending mainstream school. These include difficulties with behaviour and sometimes substance abuse, fear of attending school and mental health problems. A few students have statements of special educational needs and the remainder are considered to be at the ‘school action’ level of special educational needs. Many students have been permanently excluded from their previous schools and have spent considerable time away from schooling with very poor records of attendance. About half the students arrive during the school year, doubling the unit’s roll as the year progresses. Almost all students are of White British heritage. The headteacher was appointed in September 2009. St David’s provides a centre where up to 32 students can be educated and from March 2011, became responsible for a small number of students in a hospital class in the local general hospital and for home

p.3

Information about the school

tuition of students. Curricular opportunities are arranged with a range of external providers such as local companies. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good unit in which students make good progress and achieve well in a wide range of academic and vocational subjects. In the centre and the hospital class, achievement is good. Home-tutored students progress well in engaging with education and building relationships with their tutor, often after considerable difficulties in these areas.

p.4

Key findings

 Individual students and groups of students such as boys and girls, and students whose circumstances make them vulnerable all achieve well.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is good throughout the unit. Lessons are well paced and challenging. Relationships between students and staff are warm and trusting and staff are very responsive to students’ individual needs and interests. Questioning in lessons is searching and marking is constructive and up to date.

p.4

Key findings

 Students are courteous and welcoming. Behaviour in the centre is good and sometimes excellent. In the hospital class, too, behaviour is good. Home- tutored students respond positively to the efforts of tutors to re-engage them in education and develop positive relationships. Students feel safe and strong procedures help ensure they are safe. Students’ moral and social development is especially well developed.

p.4

Key findings

 The headteacher and senior staff lead and manage well, ensuring that high expectations of students’ behaviour and achievement are sustained and forging a deeply committed staff team. The innovative curriculum is modified regularly to ensure it fully meets students’ changing needs and interests. Academic and personal progress is effectively assessed and tracked to ensure students are doing as well as they should be.

p.4

Key findings

 A secure start has been made in bringing together the three aspects of the unit’s work since the hospital class and home tuition became part of its remit. However, the service is not as seamless as it should be and home tuition Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

lessons are not monitored frequently enough.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that the centre, the hospital class and home tuition form a seamless service including by greater sharing of staff and their expertise; and through wider sharing of resources.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that leaders regularly observe home tuition sessions.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students enter the unit with attainment that is below average often because of considerable periods of missed schooling. Students in the centre make good progress and achieve well in a wide range of subjects including English and mathematics and vocational areas. By the time they leave, their attainment is broadly average. Progress in Year 10, as the unit works unstintingly to engage new students and deal with barriers to learning, is slower than that in Year 11. Students in the hospital class achieve well and when possible, return to mainstream schooling. Students who are taught at home and who often have the severest needs make good progress in becoming engaged in learning and in starting to develop a positive relationship with their tutor.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students make good gains in literacy and numeracy as indicated by initial testing and subsequent assessment. They gain a good range of academic and vocational qualifications carefully tailored to their needs and including GCSEs, BTEC and Adult Literacy and Numeracy qualifications. Students are well prepared for future work or training and a high percentage go on to work, training or further education on leaving. Different groups of students including boys and girls, students looked after by the local authority, students with statements of special educational needs and those eligible for free school meals all achieve well.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In all lessons observed, students made good progress and the unit’s observations of lessons, progress data and scrutiny of students’ work demonstrate this is typical of their performance over time. Parents and carers are confident about the good progress their children make and students themselves recognise they are achieving well, often after periods of failure elsewhere and long absences from schooling.

p.5

Quality of teaching

Teaching is good in the centre, the hospital class and in home tuition. This includes teaching in English and mathematics, and a range of other academic and vocational Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Quality of teaching

subjects. All lessons observed in all venues were good. Teaching is enthusiastic and relationships between students and teachers are warm and respectful. Planning is ‘to the point’ and lessons make it clear to students what they are expected to learn. Questioning is used well to stretch students and to check how much they understand. In an English lesson in the centre, for example, the teacher used questioning well to probe students’ understanding. The activities which included analysing newspaper bias were pitched well to provide challenge and stimulate interest. Information and communication technology is used effectively in lessons. Work is accurately pitched to match the students’ levels of attainment and reflect their interests. This is helped by the staff knowing individual students very well and making effective use of the accurate progress data. Challenging targets are set which students meet.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Because classes are very small in the centre and in the hospital class, students’ errors are explained and discussed as they arise. Marking is encouraging while also indicating how they can improve. The pace of lessons is well judged and, where possible, brisk. In home tuition, the one-to-one nature of the sessions is beneficial and is used well to adapt sessions to capture students’ interests. In the hospital class, students’ interests, for example, their enthusiasm about a film they had seen together, are used well to encourage discussion.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The unit’s lesson observations indicate good teaching over time. Students and parents and carers consider teaching to be good. The points that could be improved to make lessons outstanding are different for different teachers and have been identified by the unit from its own observations. The thoughtfully planned and flexible curriculum supports teaching well, helping ensure a wide range of stimulating activities. Teachers promote students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well, for example, encouraging social skills and respect by their own example.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students’ behaviour in the centre is good and sometimes it is exemplary. In the hospital class, students also behave well. Students in home tuition sessions can be the most reluctant to engage in education and the skills of the home tutors are used well to encourage the students and give them confidence to try. Students say they feel safe and parents and carers too are confident about their children’s safety. Students act safely and with consideration for others in all the venues of the unit and when they are working with outside providers they respond well to safety requirements and work very hard. Parents and carers and students themselves recognise that behaviour is good.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Typically, students are courteous to adults and to each other. There is minimal evidence of bullying and the unit has clear policies in place to deal with bullying on the rare occasions when it occurs. Exclusions are low and for short periods and students return promptly and fit back into routines and expectations quickly. The unit’s efforts over several years to develop a welcoming ethos with high expectations Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

shows in the very high standards of behaviour that students set for themselves and others. Students have a clear understanding of right and wrong and their social skills are very well developed. Learning mentors make a valuable contribution to students’ development and good behaviour. Students know they are free to express their views and that they can always turn to someone who will listen to them.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

In the centre, attendance is low compared with mainstream schools but is improving year on year and has improved rapidly in the last six months. There are individual examples of very marked improvements in attendance as students become engaged in all that the unit offers. The management committee and the unit place great emphasis on attendance and do all they can to improve it, including by working very closely indeed with other services and with parents and carers. Punctuality to lessons is good.

p.7

Leadership and management

Members of the management committee have a wide range of knowledge and expertise and the committee’s effectiveness has improved in the previous year. Plans to move to a single management committee for St David’s are well considered. The local education authority and the management committee work closely together and are very clear about their respective responsibilities. Safeguarding meets current requirements well. Lessons observed jointly by the headteacher and the inspector indicated the accuracy of the unit’s judgement of the quality of teaching over time. Comprehensive appraisal systems ensure that staff’s professional development needs are identified and suitable support and training put in place so that they are knowledgeable and confident in their roles.

p.7

Leadership and management

The rich, varied and innovative curriculum and related accreditation are regularly monitored and adjusted to meet the needs and interests of students. The very wide range of external providers is well chosen and contributes strongly to the relevance and enjoyment of the curriculum. Activities include car maintenance, farm work, and orienteering. Drug and alcohol abuse and other health issues are addressed seriously through the curriculum and by specialist partnerships. Equal opportunities are well promoted, for example, by the unit tracking students’ progress and intervening as necessary and because the ethos conveys clearly its lack of tolerance of any kind of discrimination.

p.7

Leadership and management

Partnerships are very strong and links with other services and agencies enable the unit to greatly enhance what it provides. Links with parents and carers are good and appreciated by them. Students’ progress in learning and in behaviour is carefully and accurately monitored and interventions are put in place where targeted progress is not as good as expected. The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of students is very important to the unit and it is particularly effective in promoting social and moral development, having a transformative effect on the lives of many students. The unit has improved the accuracy of its tracking of progress and its monitoring of teaching in the centre and the hospital class. Self-evaluation is very accurate and staff are ambitious to do better. The unit’s capacity for sustained Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

p.7

Leadership and management

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Leadership and management

Since it became responsible for the hospital class and home tuition, the unit has made a secure start in coordinating these services and the work of the centre. Opportunities are sometimes missed to make the three aspects into the seamless service that it could be, for example, by sharing staff, resources and expertise more. Home tuition is monitored through leaders following the progress students make and through supervision meetings between senior staff and tutors, but home tuition lessons have not been observed as frequently as they should be.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of St David’s Pupil Referral Unit, Hereford HR1 2DY

It was a pleasure to meet you when I inspected St David’s recently. Thank you for making me feel so welcome and for talking to me when circumstances allowed in your lessons. Thank you, too, to those of you who met me to speak about your work and other aspects of the pupil referral unit. You made it very clear to me how much you valued what the unit offers.

p.11

Inspection of St David’s Pupil Referral Unit, Hereford HR1 2DY

St David’s is a good unit in all its aspects: the centre, the hospital class and the home tuition service. You achieve well in academic and vocational subjects. Your behaviour is always good and sometimes excellent and I noticed especially how courteous you were to staff and to each other. Very well done. The teaching is good in all the aspects of the unit with well-planned and well-paced lessons that capture your interest. The unit is well led and managed and the atmosphere is warm and welcoming.

p.11

Inspection of St David’s Pupil Referral Unit, Hereford HR1 2DY

There are two things the unit could do better so I have asked the staff to:

p.11

Inspection of St David’s Pupil Referral Unit, Hereford HR1 2DY

 ensure the centre, the hospital class and the home tuition service work together more closely  make sure the lessons of the home tutors are regularly monitored.

p.11

Inspection of St David’s Pupil Referral Unit, Hereford HR1 2DY

I am sure you will all want to play your part in these improvements. For example, you could make sure you take full advantage of the new opportunities offered by the greater sharing of staff and resources.

p.11

Inspection of St David’s Pupil Referral Unit, Hereford HR1 2DY

Michael Farrell Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion