Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Feb 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Katrina Gueli

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Katrina Gueli

  • Postcode verified

    S10 2PW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveenjoymenteffectivelyhigh expectationsmake good progresssecuresecure knowledge
Criticismnot consistentlynot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings540w+76
  • Leadership107w+49
  • What needs to improve108w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
728
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs B Jackson Headteacher King Edward VII School Glossop Road Sheffield S10 2PW

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 11 and 12 January 2012 to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of eight lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

The overall effectiveness of science is good.

p.1

Achievement in science

 Students make good progress and achieve well from their broadly average starting points. The proportion of students gaining at least two A* to C grades at GCSE has been significantly above average for the last three years.  In 2011, almost three quarters of the cohort gained three separate GCSE science qualifications; most of these students attained A* to C grades in all three subjects.  Students’ enjoyment of, and success in, science is reflected in both the number of students choosing to continue their science studies post-16 and the subsequent progression of the large majority of these students to science-related degree courses.  In lessons, most students show good attitudes to learning and a willingness to engage in activities. Most work well collaboratively and demonstrate secure independent learning skills.  Students’ have a secure knowledge of their targets and understanding of how to improve their learning in Key Stage 4 and 5. These aspects are less

p.1

Quality of teaching in science

The quality of teaching in science is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in science

 Teachers’ very strong subject knowledge and enthusiasm for science successfully promote students’ achievement and enjoyment.  Lessons typically build effectively on students’ prior learning and incorporate a range of activities and approaches that is well matched to students’ needs.  Students highlight the quality of teachers’ explanations; the variety of activities in lessons; and, the use of practical work to develop their understanding as strengths of the teaching in the department.  Teachers use questioning effectively to check students’ understanding and extend their thinking.  The use of a wider range of assessment strategies to monitor learning during lessons, along with good quality marking and helpful written feedback to students, is not consistently embedded across the department.  Relationships in the classroom are positive and students, particularly in Key Stages 4 and 5, appreciate the high levels of support provided by

p.2

Quality of teaching in science

staff.  Teachers make effective use of a range of information and communication technology (ICT) applications to support learning in the classroom.  Opportunities for students to use ICT to support their learning in science are developing with the availability of extensive facilities in the school’s new science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) centre.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in science

The quality of the curriculum in science is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in science

 Collaborative planning with a strong focus on setting learning in interesting contexts, and the effective deployment of specialist subject teachers, ensures that the curriculum at Key Stages 4 and 5 engages most students well.  The flexible use of a three-year Key Stage 4 to complete either a double or triple award course contributes to students’ good achievement in science.  Small numbers of students benefit from a range of trips and visits to enrich the curriculum, but some, particularly at Key Stage 4, feel this aspect of the provision could be enhanced further.  The STEM club is popular with students in Years 7 and 8, and cross- curricular themed learning weeks in Year 8 provide good opportunities for students to pursue open-ended investigations.  Good links with local universities support curriculum delivery in the sixth form.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in science

The effectiveness of leadership and management in science is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in science

 Leaders in the department have ensured that teachers have high expectations of students and that all staff share a strong commitment to securing their good achievement.  Students’ progress is carefully monitored and effective actions are taken to address identified underperformance.  External professional development opportunities have been used well to enhance leadership skills, develop provision and deepen subject expertise within the department.  There is a secure view of the quality of teaching and learning across the department but lesson evaluation does not always focus sharply enough on the impact of teaching on students’ progress.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 extending good practice in relation to curriculum contextualisation into Years 7 and 8  ensuring that students know what to do to improve their work, especially at Key Stage 3  increasing the effectiveness with which learning is monitored in lessons  developing curriculum enrichment opportunities further, particularly at Key Stage 4.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion