Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Norton Free Church of England Primary School
Summary
Kathryn Dodd (lead), Julie Harrison
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Jan 2012
- Inspectors verified
Julie Harrison, Kathryn Dodd
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Name on report verified
Norton Free CE Primary School
- URN verified
107106
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers’ enthusiasm and very positive relationships, coupled with effective management of pupils’ behaviour and use of interactive whiteboards all make a strong contribution to pupils’ good progress. p.6
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.9
- This very caring, safe and supportive school, underpinned by strong Christian values, reflects the commitment of everyone to improving pupils’ achievement. p.7
- Pupils are considerate, polite and respectful to adults and to one another. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
- Even so, a very small minority expressed that cases of bullying are not always dealt with effectively. p.7
- These practices are not yet fully embedded in mathematics and occasionally opportunities to challenge the more-able pupils are overlooked. p.4
- Analysis of school behavioural records indicates that incidents of poor behaviour have decreased and now are rare. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,374
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Norton Free CE Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 10–11 January 2012 Inspection number 377535 Unique Reference Number 107106 Local authority Sheffield Inspection number 377535 Inspection dates 10–11 January 2012 Lead inspector Kathryn Dodd
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 213 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Ian Auckland Headteacher Helena Button Date of previous school inspection 5 May 2009 School address Matthews Lane Sheffield S8 8JS Telephone number 0114 2745873 Fax number 0114 2359060 Email address enquiries@nortonfree.sheffield.sch.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.1
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.2
To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
Kathryn Dodd Julie Harrison Additional inspector Additional inspector
p.3
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspectors observed 13 lessons involving eight teachers and support staff. The inspectors held discussions with staff, groups of pupils, with members of the governing body and with parents and carers. The inspectors observed the school’s work and reviewed documentation, including a review of improvement plans, the systems for tracking pupils’ progress, the arrangements for safeguarding pupils and a sample of pupils’ work. Inspectors took account of the responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. The inspectors analysed 111 questionnaires returned by parents and carers. 100 questionnaires from pupils and 16 from staff were also reviewed.
p.3
Information about the school
Almost all of the pupils at this average sized school are White British. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below average. Although the proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average, the proportion supported by a statement of special educational needs is below average. Current government floor standards are met. The school has been accredited with the Quality Mark for Basic Skills and it has achieved Healthy School status. The headteacher has been in post since September 2009. There is a separate after school provision on site, which is privately managed and was not inspected as part of this inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key Findings
This is a good school. It has improved at a good rate since the previous inspection, when its overall effectiveness was judged as satisfactory. This reflects good leadership and management. The rigorous and concerted action taken by the school has been effective and ensured the quality of teaching and the curriculum is good. Good partnerships with parents and carers are fostered. Questionnaires returned by a high proportion of parents and carers show that most would recommend the school to another parent or carer. Achievement is good. Pupils of all ages, including children in the Early Years Foundation Stage, make good progress. Attainment by the end of Year 6 is above average in English, although it is broadly average in mathematics. Initiatives aimed at raising attainment in mathematics are underway. Pupils’ progress is accelerating. By the end of Year 2 attainment in mathematics is now above average. Although the majority of pupils now make good progress, it is
p.4
Key Findings
still not as good as in English. The quality of teaching over time is good. Teachers make good use of outcomes from assessments to plan and provide tasks, tailor their questions and use support staff to ensure the varying needs of pupils are met. In reading and writing, pupils have good opportunities to use and apply their skills across a range of subjects and are clear about how to reach their challenging learning targets. These practices are not yet fully embedded in mathematics and occasionally opportunities to challenge the more-able pupils are overlooked. Behaviour is good. Pupils say that it has improved. Pupils respond well to the strategies to managing pupil behaviour, which are consistently well applied by all staff. Pupils are considerate, polite and respectful to adults and to one another. Leaders ensure pupils’ skills and abilities are assessed regularly and accurately. They use this information effectively to pinpoint improvement priorities, such as
p.4
Key Findings
mathematics. The system used to track this information does not always enable leaders to easily identify differences in performance between all groups of pupils, such as the more able. New subject leaders know that their next steps are to increase their involvement in reviewing this information.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise attainment and accelerate pupils’ progress to a consistently good rate in mathematics, by: making sure assessment information is used consistently well to provide activities that challenge pupils of all abilities, especially the more able making sure that pupils are clear about the steps they need to take to attain their learning targets providing more opportunities for pupils to develop their mathematical skills and to apply them through solving problems.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Further improve the effectiveness with which pupil progress information is reviewed by: extending the systems to track pupils’ performance in order to pinpoint differences in the performance of different groups developing the roles of new subject leaders in reviewing the information.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Achievement is good. Pupils, including those who are disabled and those who have special educational needs, make good progress. This view is endorsed by the very large majority of parents and carers in questionnaires. In lessons, pupils behave well, are keen to learn and most respond very enthusiastically to teachers’ questions. Pupils enjoy their work, especially when discussing their learning together, such as in pairs or undertaking practical activities where they work collaboratively. Pupils’ concentration occasionally drifts as they work independently when activities provided are insufficiently challenging. Pupils who are disabled and those who have special educational needs are well supported in lessons, learning effectively alongside their peers. A good range of additional support programmes beyond the classroom further contributes to their good achievement.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Learning gets off to a successful start in the Early Years Foundation Stage, where children make good progress from their starting points which are typically below that expected for their age. Very warm and caring relationships between adults and children, along with the bright, lively, well organised and resourced learning environment, ensure that children quickly find out that learning is enjoyable and exciting. In recent years pupils’ attainment in reading by the end of Year 2 has been rising and is now above average. A well established, systematic programme to teach pupils to read is in place. Attainment in reading by the end of Year 6 is also above average. This represents good progress from pupils’ previous broadly average starting points. Older pupils develop a real passion for reading books. This, along with good opportunities to practise their skills during topic work or homework for example, contributes to their good achievement. In mathematics, both by the end of
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Year 2 and Year 6, the proportion of pupils reaching the higher levels of attainment falls behind the proportion in reading and writing. A higher proportion of pupils currently in Year 6 are on track to reach the higher Level 5 in 2012. This demonstrates that recent initiatives aimed at boosting achievement in mathematics are already paying dividends and, as a result, the gap between English and mathematics is now closing.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The quality of teaching, including in the Early Years Foundation Stage, is good. Almost all parents and carers agree. Teachers’ enthusiasm and very positive relationships, coupled with effective management of pupils’ behaviour and use of interactive whiteboards all make a strong contribution to pupils’ good progress. Teachers assess their pupil’s progress regularly and accurately. They use this information effectively to plan activities that are matched well to pupils’ varying needs. The use of support staff contributes well to pupils’ good progress, especially those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Consistently good quality marking in pupils’ literacy books ensures they are clear about the next steps they need to take to attain their learning targets. These effective techniques are not yet consistently used in mathematics. Opportunities for moving learning forward at a fast pace in mathematics are sometimes overlooked. In a minority of lessons,
p.6
Quality of teaching
activities do not always challenge the more-able pupils. In the best lessons, like those seen in Year 6, very direct, fast paced, skilful and challenging questioning deepens pupils’ understanding. Similarly, practical and engaging activities keep pupils continually motivated. Ongoing encouragement from their teacher to strive for very challenging learning targets also contributes to their accelerated progress.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Effective teaching of linking letters with the sounds they make ensures pupils make good progress in reading. Regular assessment is used effectively to organise pupils into groups of similar ability and to ensure daily activities closely reflect pupils’ individual needs. In regular lessons for this, staff provide ongoing opportunities for pupils to hear, say, read and to write letters, sounds and words. Further opportunities for pupils to read with adults, together with the effective support provided to encourage parents and carers to hear their children read at home, contributes to pupils’ good progress. Teachers provide a good range of activities enabling pupils to work in teams or talk about learning in pairs. This contributes effectively to their good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. The curriculum provides effective support for pupils with social and emotional needs. The `nurture group’ for example, enables pupils to understand how to improve their
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Almost all pupils, as indicated in returned pupil questionnaires, agree that behaviour is good. They acknowledge that over time, it has improved. This was confirmed by inspection observations. Analysis of school behavioural records indicates that incidents of poor behaviour have decreased and now are rare. Pupils say that lessons are seldom disrupted by inappropriate behaviour and, if this happens, staff deal with it effectively and quickly. Pupils are clear about expectations of their good behaviour and are keen to rise to this. This, along with the good provision for developing pupils’ understanding of `respect’, `tolerance’ and `cooperation’ through assemblies for example, contributes well to their moral development. Playground leaders enthusiastically organise games at break and lunchtimes, where pupils of all ages get on noticeably well together. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage behave
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
well. This shows in their ability to listen respectfully to adults and one another. The very large majority of parents and carers also agree that there is a good standard of behaviour. Even so, a very small minority expressed that cases of bullying are not always dealt with effectively. Inspectors found arrangements to be appropriate and, as a result, incidents are now rare. Pupils say that when bullying occurs, it is dealt with very quickly. Pupils have confidence in approaching staff with any problems or concerns and are confident that they feel safe in school. Similarly, they talk knowledgeably about how to keep safe beyond school. They are keenly aware of matters relating to `road safety’ and `stranger danger’. Pupils’ attendance is consistently above average and reflects their enjoyment of school.
p.7
Leadership and management
This very caring, safe and supportive school, underpinned by strong Christian values, reflects the commitment of everyone to improving pupils’ achievement. The headteacher provides a clear vision of where and how to improve achievement. Her accurate evaluation of the school’s effectiveness stems from a rigorous monitoring of the quality of provision. School leaders and managers monitor the quality of teaching and the curriculum robustly, using outcomes astutely to improve them. This has resulted in the quality of teaching and the curriculum being strengthened, which now are good. Consequently, pupils’ progress has accelerated from a satisfactory to a good rate. Successful adaptations to the writing curriculum, such as providing more regular and exciting opportunities to write creatively and at length, in topic work or homework projects, are helping to raise attainment in writing even further. A concerted effort to promote equality of opportunities also helps to bring about
p.7
Leadership and management
improvement in achievement. This is why the gap between English and mathematics is starting to close. These successes demonstrate a good capacity to continue to improve. Although effective procedures are in place to accurately assess and to track the progress of individual pupils, this information is not yet used effectively to spot differences between some groups of pupils, such as the more-able pupils. The governing body offer effective support and provide ongoing challenge, particularly to ensure that that quality of teaching improves. They have a good understanding of how, where and why the school has improved and of the next improvements that are required. Safeguarding procedures, particularly the arrangements to ensure all staff are well trained and to ensure pupils know how to keep themselves safe, are good.
p.7
Leadership and management
In their quest to improve pupils’ achievement, leaders and the governing body forge effective partnerships with parents and carers and beyond school. Staff particularly value the opportunities that stem from such partnerships to extend their own professional development. This has contributed to the improved quality of teaching. Partnerships also help to extend and enrich the curriculum in key areas, such as literacy, sport and music. Links with other schools nearby and around the world, such as in Germany and Tanzania, contribute well to pupils’ good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. As a result pupils show great sensitivity, tolerance and respect for diverse faiths and cultures and for those less fortunate than themselves. By seeking the views of parents and carers through the `parents’ forum’ and by consulting on improvement priorities, such as approaches to managing behaviour, parents and carers also make a good contribution to school improvement.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils' punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils' freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main
findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of Norton Free CE Primary School, Sheffield S8 8JS
Thank you for the warm welcome you gave the team when we inspected your school. We thoroughly enjoyed our time with you and finding out your views. You go to a good school. By Year 6, your attainment is above that expected for your age and you make good progress, particularly in reading and writing. We were particularly pleased to:
p.11
Inspection of Norton Free CE Primary School, Sheffield S8 8JS
see your good behaviour and hear about how you think it has improved find out you feel so safe in school and how much you know about keeping safe out of school hear pupils in Year 6 perform the song they composed about the weather and singing it in German find out that the quality of teaching in your school has improved and that it is now good.
p.11
Inspection of Norton Free CE Primary School, Sheffield S8 8JS
We have asked that some improvements be made. These are to make sure that: your teachers help you make consistently good progress, particularly in mathematics adults with special responsibilities check even more carefully that you learn equally well in all your classes, particularly those of you who are capable of reaching the higher levels of attainment.
p.11
Inspection of Norton Free CE Primary School, Sheffield S8 8JS
You can help by making sure that you tell your teacher if your work is too easy or hard and by always checking what you still have to do to reach your learning targets. Of course, you should make sure that you always try your best in everything you do.
p.11
Inspection of Norton Free CE Primary School, Sheffield S8 8JS
I wish you all the very best for a bright and successful future.
p.11
Inspection of Norton Free CE Primary School, Sheffield S8 8JS
Kathryn Dodd Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion