Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Quality Protects Children Ltd in Knowsley

Inspected 29 Nov 2011 · published 11 Jan 2012 · URN SC405448

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julia Toller

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    29 Nov 2011

  • Inspectors verified

    Julia Toller

  • URN verified

    SC405448

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings57w0
  • What needs to improve99w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
152
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 50
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 81%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC405448 Inspection date 29/11/2011 Inspector Julia Toller Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 24/08/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.3

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Brief description of the service

This home is registered to care for five children aged between 10 and 17 years with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.4

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress.

p.4

Progress

At the last full inspection the home was judged as satisfactory. This inspection shows that the children's home has demonstrated satisfactory improvement in the quality of care and outcomes for young people.

p.4

Progress

Relationships between staff and young people have improved and the young people reported that they are happier living at the home. However, although the number of sanctions being made of young people has reduced, they remain high, as does police intervention at the home. The organisation has acknowledged this and has engaged with a psychotherapist to further develop care plans and behaviour management plans for young people in an effort to reduce sanctions and police intervention.

p.4

Progress

This is a satisfactory, child-focused service, but there continues to be some issues with the local community. The manager and staff continue to work with neighbours, young people and the local community and police to reduce anti-social behaviour in their community, which is not all associated with the children's home. The young people's views are gathered particularly with regard to how they are accepted by the local community and these are being implemented in influencing the home's operation and future direction.

p.4

Progress

Satisfactory outcomes are being achieved and young people continue to receive a satisfactory standard of care from a competent and qualified staff team. There have been a few staff changes since the last inspection and the organisation continues to strive to recruit a suitably qualified and experienced staff group.

p.4

Progress

Placements are stable and young people take some responsibility for their behaviour. There are some behaviour management concerns but these have reduced since the last inspection. The promotion of young people's education, health and well-being are satisfactory and are continuing to improve. For some young people this is a significant improvement and demonstrates how individual young people have made progress.

p.4

Progress

The home's aims and objectives are being fulfilled. There are satisfactory quality assurance systems being used to monitor the operation, management, records and young people's welfare. Realistic and challenging targets are outlined within the home’s development plan. They have also developed an action plan in conjunction with the local authority and police to reduce anti-social behaviour within the home and the local community. This demonstrates a willingness to improve. Good monitoring systems are used that comply with the requirements of Regulation 33 and 34. Planning for the future is founded on evidence which identifies areas of weakness and builds on the areas of strength that this service demonstrates.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure that the home has a clear written policy on managing behaviour, which includes supporting positive behaviour, de-escalation of conflicts, discipline, control and restraint, that all staff understand and apply at all times (NMS 3.3)  ensure that the home's approach to care minimises the need for police involvement to deal with challenging behaviour and avoids criminalising children unnecessarily. The home follows procedures and guidance on police involvement in the home, which have been agreed with local police. (NMS 3.22)

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion