Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Jan 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael McIlroy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael McIlroy

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedhigh expectationsgood progressimprovingeffectivelyrigorousstrengthsclear
Criticismweaknessesinsufficientbelowmissednot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1018w−7
  • What needs to improve88w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,101
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Whittaker Acting Headteacher Dovecot Primary School Grant Road Liverpool Merseyside L14 0LH

p.1

School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 6 December 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. I would be grateful if you would please extend my thanks to the staff, the pupils with whom I met and to the Chair of the Governing Body and the representative of the local authority with whom I spoke.

p.1

School

Since the previous inspection, the headteacher has retired. The school is currently led by an acting headteacher.

p.1

School

As a result of the inspection in May 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

School

In 2011, results for pupils at the end of Key Stage 2 improved compared to the last set of recorded results in 2009. Improvement was stronger in English than in mathematics, and results in writing were stronger than those for reading. However, overall results remained well below average. Overall standards at Key Stage 1 also rose but were also well below average due to weaknesses in mathematics. In the majority of lessons observed during the monitoring inspection, pupils made good progress in their learning. The school’s assessment data show that the progress made by pupils in their learning is increasing and that more pupils are now working at the levels expected for children of their age.

p.1

School

Following the previous inspection, the school concentrated on improving pupils’ writing. Greater opportunities were provided for pupils to write in different genres and carry out more writing in other subjects. However, the focus on practising different types of writing in subjects, such as history, has placed some limits on the amount of subject specific September 2011

p.1

School

Page2 information pupils are taught. Since the beginning of the academic year, the rate of improvement in other areas of the school’s work has accelerated sharply. Attendance is rising and behaviour has been improved. The school has refocused its priorities appropriately on mathematics and on improving teaching and learning. Useful action plans for these areas and for English have been drawn up but these do not contain sufficient milestones by which progress in raising attainment and the quality of teaching can be measured. The school’s timetable has been changed and extended to ensure a better balance between subjects. More time has been allocated to science which is now taught in greater depth. English and mathematics lessons have been extended and additional lessons introduced to develop basic skills in mathematics and reading.

p.2

School

The acting headteacher has introduced procedures for the regular assessment of pupils’ learning and for more-robust analysis of data. These data provide a clearer picture of pupils’ progress and of where underachievement lies. Consequently, additional adults have been suitably deployed so that they support more effectively less-able pupils and those who have fallen behind in their learning. Expectations of what pupils can achieve have been raised, partly due to the greater professional dialogue that is taking place in pupil progress meetings where data are analysed and strategies for tackling underachievement are agreed. This, and the clear setting out by the acting headteacher of what is expected of staff, has increased the accountability of teachers.

p.2

School

The monitoring of teaching and learning has become more rigorous. Teachers’ planning and pupils’ work are regularly checked. ‘Learning walks’ are carried out and the findings of these reported back to staff. Regular observations of teaching and learning have been undertaken with the help of the local authority and weaknesses in teaching have been robustly tackled. Staff meetings have concentrated on how to improve teaching and a number of teachers have visited another school to observe good practice in lessons. These initiatives have helped teachers provide pupils with more challenging work and to increase the pace of learning. Strengths in good teaching included good use of information and communication technology, sharply focused questioning, good behaviour management and good preparation of resources. Weaknesses in satisfactory teaching included some activities that were overcomplicated for pupils, insufficient challenge for more-able pupils, explanations

p.2

School

that were not fully clear, too much teacher talk and plenary sessions at the end of lessons that were not long enough. Marking advises pupils of what they need to do to improve but the understanding by pupils of the National Curriculum levels at which they are working and are aiming towards is underdeveloped.

p.2

School

Satisfactory progress has been made in developing pupils’ understanding of the multicultural nature of Britain. An action plan has been drawn up and a whole-school project undertaken that studied different local ethnic groups. Assemblies have been used to introduce and discuss different cultures existing within British society and a number of posters of prominent Britons of different ethnic heritage are displayed around the school. Links have been recently established with schools which have different pupil intakes. However, opportunities are missed, such as in history topics, to teach pupils about the contribution of different minority ethnic groups to British society. September 2011

p.2

School

Page3 The acting headteacher has made appropriate use of the local authority’s services to accelerate improvement. It has provided good support to the school. A local authority officer who is also the School’s Improvement Partner visits regularly and a mathematics consultant works closely with staff. The local authority has carried out a review of teaching and learning, provided extra funds and facilitated a link for the school’s leadership with a headteacher of another school.

p.3

School

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Improve attainment and accelerate the progress made by pupils in English, mathematics and science in Key Stage 1 and 2 by ensuring that in all classes:

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

- work is sufficiently challenging and enables pupils to build on their prior attainment - pupils have opportunities to improve their writing when working in subjects across the curriculum - lessons have a quick pace, with high expectations of what all groups of pupils can achieve.

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Ensure that pupils develop a good understanding of the multicultural nature of modern Britain.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion