Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Tony Gallagher
- Postcode verified
IP23 7BL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school. p.3
- As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
- A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 693
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr J McAtear Headteacher Hartismere School Castleton Way Eye Suffolk IP23 7BL
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 8 and 9 December 2011 to look at work in citizenship.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of lessons.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship
The overall effectiveness of citizenship is good.
p.1
Achievement in citizenship
Achievement in citizenship is good with outstanding features.
p.1
Achievement in citizenship
Students display very good understanding of key citizenship education concepts and respond well to the opportunities provided to apply these in practical ways. For example, an extremely high level of engagement with the local community enables students to identify social issues which are of concern to them and to instigate and run charitable events to support their cause. The level and quality of debate among students are outstanding. Students express their views and opinions clearly and confidently. Even when their ideas are not fully formed, students are at ease in contributing to classroom discussions. Most students have a good grasp of issues in the national and international news and display a critical attitude to the world around them. A minority, however, are detached and struggle to relate to the citizenship topics being considered.
p.1
Quality of teaching in citizenship
The quality of teaching in citizenship is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching in citizenship
Teaching in citizenship-related subjects is effective and conducted in a good-natured fashion. Teachers have high expectations of students and frame questions which enable students to demonstrate their ability well; tasks set are clearly explained. In the most effective lessons, teachers made seamless and relevant links, enabling students to relate aspects of the subject to topical issues. In English, a timely and relevant newspaper piece explored British cultural attitudes; a French lesson took a lively and engaging look at identity and diversity; and science teachers enabled students to discuss evidence about society’s commitment to sustainability. Conversely, in the less effective examples, teachers lacked the vocabulary, depth of knowledge and confidence to sufficiently explore citizenship- related topics. For the same reasons, a few struggled to effectively incorporate controversial issues into lessons.
p.2
Quality of teaching in citizenship
Overall, the school has much experience in assessment, target-setting and reporting generally; instances were seen of effective peer assessment. In relation to citizenship education, however, assessment is insecure.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in citizenship
The quality of the curriculum in citizenship is good.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in citizenship
The organisation of citizenship through a core personal, social, health citizenship and economic education programme (PSHCEE), linked subjects, the religious education GCSE and extensive community engagement is pragmatic and enables suitable coverage of the programme of study. The community dimension adds much to the development of students’ citizenship-related skills. Opportunities for sixth form students to become involved in volunteering and create constructive extra-curricular opportunities for themselves are encouraged by the school and valued by students. External agencies work willingly with the school and provide support. Their involvement at times stems directly from students having made contact, thereby sharpening the application of students’ citizenship skills.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in citizenship
The effectiveness of leadership and management in citizenship is good. The school has a specific aim of supporting young people to make a significant contribution to their community. Senior managers have ensured that ample opportunities exist for students to develop the skills, knowledge and aptitudes to meet this aim. Formal mechanisms are in place, such as school councils, which enable student involvement in making decisions. The school also succeeds in creating an ethos whereby students readily and voluntarily involve themselves in school and community life. Senior managers and citizenship subject leaders have previously undertaken a PSHCEE subject review and taken actions accordingly. They have a clear view about what needs to be done to bring about further improvement, for example, in relation to developing teachers’ broad understanding of citizenship education, and access to up-to-date and
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in citizenship
relevant curricular resources. Plans to bring about these improvements, however, are less evident. The school is not sufficiently linked into professional citizenship networks which provide the potential to support subject leaders.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
providing opportunities to update the staff involved in citizenship education on its core concepts and processes reviewing assessment arrangements drawing on external subject support.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion