Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by St Cuthbert’s Care in Newcastle upon Tyne
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Dec 2011
- Inspectors verified
Steve Pearson
- URN verified
SC033467
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 57
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC033467 Inspection date 07/12/2011 Inspector Steve Pearson Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 02/08/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
The children's home is provided by a charitable organisation and cares for up to eight young people of either gender aged 10 to 17 years old. It is registered to care for young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress.
p.4
Progress
At the previous inspection on 3 August 2011, Ofsted made one recommendation and judged the overall effectiveness of the home as good. The recommendation was that young people should have a say in decisions about who is recruited to work at the home.
p.4
Progress
The current inspection assessed whether the recommendation had been met. It also assessed what the young people, Registered Manager and staff said about any changes that had taken place. The records of young people's house meetings and quality monitoring reports were also assessed.
p.4
Progress
Since the previous inspection, young people have helped to interview new members of staff and their opinions have helped to influence recruitment decisions. This means the procedures are more inclusive and effective. Young people also feel valued and involved in what happens in their home.
p.4
Progress
Other improvements have taken place since the last inspection. For example, a member of staff and each young person meet once a week to decide a plan for the following week. This includes dates of appointments and other forthcoming events. This gives young people greater clarity about important issues for the week ahead and helps them feel more settled and secure.
p.4
Progress
At the previous inspection, outcomes associated with education and health were extremely positive. These outcomes are not quite so positive now. However, the home has sought and obtained support from the local authority's virtual headteacher who provides on-line support to young people who are struggling with their education. The Registered Manager and staff continue to work hard with all young people to address these issues.
p.4
Progress
Young people's house meetings are held every week and the staff record the minutes. A new format has been introduced to help ensure that issues from the previous meeting are considered at the next meeting. However, it is often unclear what action is to be taken as a result of the issues young people raise. There is only partial evidence to show that issues they bring up are then acted upon. An external person visits the home once a month to assess the quality of care. They assess all the relevant issues and gather information from a wide range of sources such as discussions with young people, their parents or relatives and the staff. The visitor then makes any necessary recommendations within their assessment report. However, the home is not always meeting these recommendations and so some are having to be repeated in consecutive reports. The Registered Manager also formally monitors the quality of care and addresses shortfalls. Although the monitoring report
p.4
Progress
is overdue for submission to Ofsted, the Registered Manager is about to send it in.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion