Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Dec 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Kilner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James Kilner

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongoutstandingeffectivegood progressimprovingsecureclearimproved
Criticismweaknessesgapsabsencelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,124
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566957 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: landerton@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Taylor Headteacher Wakefield St Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School Charles Street Wakefield West Yorkshire WF1 4PE

p.1

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 7 December 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the pupils, your local authority link adviser and the Chair of the Governing Body.

p.1

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

As a result of the inspection on 1 July 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Since the last inspection the school has experienced a number of changes. The pupil roll has increased and there are a larger proportion of pupils who are new to learning English. Recent staff changes have included the appointment of a new deputy headteacher from the start of the autumn term. Staffing in the Early Years Foundation Stage has been adversely affected by long-term absence which has led to a series of temporary appointments over the last year.

p.1

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Due to unforeseen circumstances, beyond the school’s control, improvements to the Early Years Foundation Stage have not proceeded as planned. Despite their best efforts, the school has been unable to secure a permanent, full-time member of staff to take on the leadership role in the Early Years Foundation Stage. An interim arrangement until a substantive appointment is made has brought about the much needed stability to the leadership. With mentoring support, brokered through the local authority, the interim leader works with a senior leader from a school identified with outstanding practice in Early Years. After a shaky start, this support is back on track to continue on a more regular basis next term. All staff have a clearer understanding of their role and there is closer working between the two classes in the Foundation Stage unit. Regular monitoring of children’s progress as September 2011

p.1

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Page2 well as lesson observations are beginning to hold teachers to account for the progress made by the children they teach. There are plans for this level of accountability to be extended to the support staff in the Early Years unit. Assessments are accurate and are increasingly used to inform activities appropriately matched to the children’s identified needs and interests. Information on children’s progress is analysed thoroughly ensuring that those starting school after the autumn term are not disadvantaged and appropriate intervention is put in place where gaps emerge. It is only recently that leaders have been in a strong enough position to tackle some of the deep-seated weaknesses identified at the last inspection. Governors are underway with arrangements to recruit a substantive leader in the spring term. While there are clear indications that efforts are beginning to bear fruit it is too early to have had

p.2

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

a demonstrable impact on the full range of provision and outcomes for the children.

p.2

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Indications from the school’s recently developed pupil tracking systems are that; overall, pupils are now making better rates of progress than they were at the last inspection. Better progress is evident in mathematics but progress is less marked in English throughout the school. Indications from unvalidated national test results for pupils in Year 6 this summer reveal more pupils achieving their potential. However, the proportion of pupils attaining the higher Level 5 remains low. Pupils’ achievement in mathematics has improved as a direct result of strong leadership of the subject by the recently appointed deputy headteacher. She has driven improvements which include a focus on ensuring the consistency of teaching, the more effective use of practical mathematical resources and rigorous tracking of pupils’ progress. Where weaknesses in teaching and learning are identified the school is able to put

p.2

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

in place support for individual teachers. To this end, the deputy headteacher’s effective classroom practice guides those requiring support to improve. It is clear that the school has made good progress in tackling weaknesses in mathematics identified at the last inspection.

p.2

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

A review of the curriculum has resulted in improvements already evident in classroom provision. Pupils are provided with increased opportunities to use their learning across a range of subjects. For example, a Year 4 class took delight in consolidating their learning about fractions by using their knowledge to cook and divide pizzas to exact proportions so that they could be divided equally among the pupils and staff. Better provision of good quality resources enables pupils to explore their learning in practical ways. The more creative curriculum is increasing pupils’ enjoyment and independence in learning, although the impact on raising their levels of attainment is only just beginning, particularly in Key Stage 1.

p.2

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

A combination of the resolve of the recently appointed deputy headteacher, working closely with the headteacher and very recent developments in tackling weaknesses indicate that the school currently demonstrates a better capacity to bring about the remaining improvements required. September 2011

p.2

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Page3 This monitoring inspection included a check on the school’s safeguarding procedures and found them to be secure and meeting current requirements.

p.3

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Marys Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

James Kilner Her Majesty's Inspector September 2011

p.3

July 2010

 Improve the quality of teaching and raise children’s attainment in the Early Years Foundation Stage by: - providing regular training for all staff so that they thoroughly understand their role - improving the day-to-day organisation and ensuring all staff are well deployed - improving the quality of assessment and using the outcomes to match tasks to children’s needs and interests - improving the leadership and management so that key priorities are tackled and changes are monitored and evaluated - ensuring that groups of children that start in the spring and summer terms do as well as those who start in the autumn term.

p.4

July 2010

 Raise standards in mathematics by: - ensuring that all teaching is at least good so that pupils learn more rapidly - providing pupils with more opportunities to apply their learning to solve problems.

p.4

July 2010

 Ensure that the curriculum at Key Stage 1 meets the needs of pupils by: - structuring it to develop pupils’ independence - ensuring it fully matches pupils’ developing academic and social needs - increasing the range, quantity and use of practical resources.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion