Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Dec 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Judith Rundle

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Judith Rundle

  • Postcode verified

    SN3 6EX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progresssuccessfullyenthusiasmrapid progressclearambitiousimprovingenjoy
Criticismmissedinconsistenciesgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,213
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs V Marsh-Ballard Liden Primary School Liden Drive Swindon Wiltshire SN3 6EX

p.1

Primary School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 29 November 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to staff, governors and the pupils.

p.1

Primary School

A number of significant changes have occurred since the previous inspection. A new headteacher, deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher have been appointed and took up their posts from September 2010. The headteacher was previously the deputy at the school. The roles and responsibilities of middle managers have been increased. A new Chair of the Governing Body took up post in September 2011. One new specialist teaching assistant has been appointed. The number of pupils on roll has dropped slightly due to the opening of a new school locally and changes in catchment areas. Classes have been reorganised. A new satellite class has been opened for pupils from the adjoining special school.

p.1

Primary School

As a result of the inspection on 6 and 7 July 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Primary School

The new senior leadership team have introduced a large number of initiatives that are driving the school forward at pace. They have complementary skills which has developed the school’s capacity to improve and enabled them to set a clear and ambitious direction for school improvement. They have swiftly created an ethos of cohesion, where everyone is working together successfully to raise pupils’ aspirations Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com and achievements. Middle mangers are now better equipped to develop others and are clear on their increased roles, responsibilities and accountability for pupils’ achievement. Initiatives are leading to an improving trend in pupils’ attainment and an increased rate of progress. However, some inconsistencies remain in how well

p.1

Primary School

these are embedded between age groups and classes. Teachers talk with enthusiasm about ‘buddying’ and professional development opportunities to observe and share good practice. They recognise that this is bringing more consistency to their work, improving the quality of teaching and raising standards.

p.2

Primary School

Since the last inspection, attainment by the end of Key Stage 2 has risen and is now above the national average for the first time in four years. This is testament to the highly focused work in raising expectations and aspirations, particularly, although not exclusively, in English and mathematics. As a result, the level of challenge has increased across the school for all pupils, including for the most able, and pupils are excited to be learning. Attainment by the end of Key Stage 1 remained broadly the same as at the last inspection. Work seen in lessons and in pupils’ books indicates this rapid progress is continuing in Key Stage 2 and progress is starting to accelerate in Key Stage 1. Pupils talk with genuine enthusiasm about the changes to the profile of reading and how this is having an impact on their writing, especially in sentence structure. They equally enjoy the mathematics challenges set at the beginning of

p.2

Primary School

every school day. Pupils take pride in their work and how it is presented in their books, and in displays that celebrate their work.

p.2

Primary School

The curriculum in Key Stage 1 has been revised successfully to better match pupils’ needs, and includes a wide range of activities and resources, including practical tasks. As a result, pupils are showing more engagement with learning, which is helping to improve their achievement. The Quest project in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 is an innovative approach to stimulate learning and produced some inspired writing about ‘The man on the moon, Bob’. One child wrote movingly that Bob ‘sleeps soundly bathed in moonbeams’. In the Year 3 and 4 mathematics lessons seen, pupils benefited from working with others of similar abilities and from tasks that challenged their thinking. They showed a broad range of strategies to successfully work out solutions. Occasionally, pupils were too easily distracted from their learning by low-level tasks.

p.2

Primary School

The use of assessment and monitoring information has improved significantly since the last inspection. Teachers use the information to carefully plan work that is better matched to the needs of all pupils. Pupils’ levels of concentration and work rate have increased, as has the level of challenge as a result. Information enables early identification and intervention with pupils who have gaps in their learning. Intervention groups are robust, support is comprehensive and pupils make significant gains in knowledge and understanding in a short time. The use of consistent procedures such as WALT (What I am learning today) and WILF (What am I looking for) in lessons helps pupils understand what they are aiming to learn. However, there are missed opportunities to refer to the WALT throughout the lesson to keep pupils, and at times staff, focused on the intended learning. Teacher and teaching assistant intervention, at the correct time, enables pupils to make swifter

p.2

Primary School

progress. Pupils understand how well they are doing; they know their targets and what to do next to improve their work because of consistent use of marking strategies and verbal feedback. Teachers recognise that not enough time is given for pupils to reflect and respond to the helpful comments. Pupils use a broad range of self-assessment and evaluation strategies pertinent to their age. Occasionally, there are missed opportunities to exploit this further, especially to observe and evaluate each other’s work. Teachers are held more robustly to account for pupils’ presentation of their work, their progress in the class, and recognise their responsibility for contributing to pupils’ attainment by the end of Key Stage 2.

p.3

Primary School

The local authority provides effective support through moderation of lessons, the sharing of good practice, and in monitoring activities and discussions with the headteacher on self-evaluation judgements. Good links have been created with the pre-school and local secondary school to support pupils’ next steps in education and learning.

p.3

Primary School

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

place in July 2010

 Raise standards in mathematics, especially for the most-able pupils, by increasing the challenge provided in their work.  Increase rate of pupils’ progress, especially in Years 3 and 4, by:  extending the Early Years Foundation Stage curriculum into Year 1 so that activities better meet pupils’ learning needs and levels of maturity  setting clear markers for pupils’ rates of progress in Years 3 and 4 so that staff and pupils are able to work steadily towards expected outcomes for Year 6.  Improve the quality of teaching from satisfactory to good by:  sharing good practice in the school  ensuring the good work in helping pupils to understand how to improve is consistently applied  raising teachers’ expectations for pupils’ concentration and involvement, and for the pace, quality and presentation of their work.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion