Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Dec 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Serco Inspections (lead), Brian Cartwright

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Brian Cartwright, Serco Inspections

  • Postcode verified

    DE15 9HR

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthigh expectationsenjoymentengagingrobustvery welloutstandingaccurate
Criticismweaknessesconcernsnot consistentlybelowlowgapslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings984w+53
  • Leadership287w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,269
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%Leadership 22%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Mrs C Bell Headteacher Riverview Primary School Suffolk Road Burton-on-Trent DE15 9HR

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Riverview Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 23 and 24 November 2011, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Riverview Primary School

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in February 2011. The full list of the areas for improvement which were identified during that inspection is set out in the annex to this letter. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Riverview Primary School

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Riverview Primary School

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – satisfacory.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Riverview Primary School

Newly Qualified Teachers may not be appointed.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Riverview Primary School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website. I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Staffordshire and the inspection team.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH Ofsted T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Serco Direct T 0121 683 3888

p.1

place in February 2011

 Improve the progress made by pupils and raise attainment to at least the national average by July 2012 by ensuring that teachers consistently: - have high expectations of what pupils can achieve - set work that is appropriately matched to pupils' abilities - move learning on at a brisk pace.

p.2

place in February 2011

 Improve pupils' enjoyment of, and behaviour in, lessons by: - providing a curriculum that is more closely matched to their interests - setting tasks in stimulating and engaging contexts - providing pupils with greater opportunities to use and apply their basic skills in a range of subjects.

p.2

place in February 2011

 Increase the rate at which the school improves by ensuring that leaders and managers, including the governing body, take swift and decisive action to deal with weaknesses as soon as they are identified through accurate and robust monitoring of teaching and learning.

p.2

place in February 2011

 Improve attendance to at least 94% by July 2011 by raising the criterion for intervention to 90%.

p.2

Evidence

During the visit I saw 11 lessons, met with groups of staff, pupils, parents and carers, governors and representatives of the local authority (LA). I scrutinized pupils’ work, records of monitoring and evaluation, and governing body minutes.

p.3

Context

There have been no major changes to the school’s circumstances or staffing complement since the previous visit. There have been changes to the assignment of LA staff that monitor the impact of the LA’s action plan.

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

The attainment of pupils in Year 2 in 2011, and from national tests in Year 6 in 2011 were below average, confirming the school’s predictions. Measures of progress for that Year 6 group were also well below average. Classroom standards remain low in general overall but there are some signs of recovery in Years 5 and 6. Good half- termly assessments of all pupils is helping to guide intervention and support, and also shows some closing of the gaps between currently low attainment and the nationally expected standards. But these note continuing concerns in the progress of pupils in some Year 2 and Year 3/4 classes. Pupils now in Year 6 are continuing to benefit from their good teaching in Year 5, and are enjoying learning. They particularly like the larger research projects that they have recently completed, which combine reading for pleasure with writing for purpose. In other classes, the vast majority of pupils focus on their learning very well once thay can get started on

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

their activities. In one excellent example in a science lesson, a Year 1 pupil could not wait to tell the rest of the class that ‘they won’t believe what we’ve done’ .

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

 Improve the progress made by pupils and raise attainment to at least the national average by July 2012 – satisfactory

p.3

Other relevant pupil outcomes

In all the lessons I observed, pupils typically behaved well, with only occasional slips in their engagement with learning caused by over-long teacher discussion. Around the school they are normally polite and considerate to one another, and close supervision ensures they have limited scope for major misbehaviour. Pupils, and all of the parents and carers I met, confirm that pupils enjoy school, feel safe, and that concerns relating to behaviour are dealt with effectively. Most parents and carers are pleased with provision, and all can recognise improvements. Attendance continues to

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

improve thanks to consistent efforts by the school in collaboration with pupils to encourage and reward good attendance, and is now slightly above the national average for primary schools.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

 Improve pupils' enjoyment of, and behaviour in, lessons – good  Improve attendance – good

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

At this visit all the lessons I saw were satisfactory or better, with the outstanding examples illustrating how effective differentiation, and minute-by-minute adjustment and support by the teacher, works to enthuse and motivate every pupil. Planning is much better, allowing pupils to work from the outset on challenging activities. Marking is also good, with most work receiving praise and suggestions for improvement although as yet pupils are not consistently responding to that advice. However, there remains a small proportion of teaching that does not differentiate the task to an appropriately personal level, has some teachers taking too long to introduce the lesson, or sees them interrupt otherwise good learning to make a point that would be better for pupils eventually to discover for themselves. I did not observe classes taught by teachers undergoing formal programmes for improving their teaching.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

Pupils are enjoying topic work, and there are some excellent examples of pupil research into areas that interest them. Some pupils said they had hoped for ‘more fun’ mathematics and English lessons, but overall the curriculum has improved well.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

 providing a curriculum that is more closely matched to their interests – satisfactory  setting tasks in stimulating and engaging contexts – satisfactory  Providing pupils with greater opportunities to use and apply their basic skills in a range of subjects – satisfactory.

p.4

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The school continues formally to address underperformance, and has been successful in bringing about improvements in most of the teaching. The evaluations of strengths and weaknesses are accurate, resulting in suitably clear development plans that also recognise the substantial improvements in pupil attainment that are still needed. Very good monitoring of teaching is being carried out by senior staff, with good support and training from the LA. There are good examples of individual

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

subject support from LA consultants, and opportunities for teachers to team teach, observe good practice, and share ideas. There remains a slight sense of anxiety despite the consistent evidence of general improvement; staff should be assured that they are able to bring about the necessary improvements in pupil achievement. Members of the governing body are spending time in school themselves, and have listened to pupils and parents and carers as they try to survey users’ views; this is important as a means of gathering evidence to corroborate their evaluations. They are also about to receive training on the interpretation of school performance data.

p.5

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.5

PROTECT-INSPECTION

 Increase the rate at which the school improves by ensuring that leaders and managers, including the governing body, take swift and decisive action to deal with weaknesses as soon as they are identified through accurate and robust monitoring of teaching and learning – satisfactory

p.5

External support

LA day-to-day classroom support is helpful. The LA, governors and school leaders are working together to secure the quality of teaching. As a result some staffing changes are taking place to ensure that the quality of provision will accelerate improvements in pupil’s learning, to meet the objectives and timescales in the LA statement of Action.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion