Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Dec 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ann Henderson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ann Henderson

  • Postcode verified

    OX27 7PX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+92Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfullyeffectivelypositivelyeffectivehigh expectationsconsistentlymake good progressenjoy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings435w+89
  • Leadership140w+78
  • What needs to improve72w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
634
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 58%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Daly Headteacher Fritwell Church of England Primary School East Street Bicester Oxfordshire OX27 7PX

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 18 November 2011 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of seven lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is good.

p.1

Achievement in English

 Attainment has been broadly in line with national averages in recent years, although results dipped slightly in 2011. The school has now raised expectations effectively and attainment seen in lessons and in pupils’ work shows that present attainment in all year groups is above average. Pupils now make good progress in reading and writing. Their speaking and listening skills are above average.  Pupils enjoy all aspects of learning in English lessons. They are eager to learn, behave well and speak positively about the interesting topics which are planned to take account of their learning needs and interests. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make as much progress as other pupils.  Through effective whole-school strategies which have been implemented since the previous school inspection, progress in writing has improved. However, in writing, more able pupils in Years 3 to 6 require further

p.1

Achievement in English

challenge to enable them to achieve the highest level of attainment..

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 There was a consistency of approach in the teaching observed during the visit. Teachers have good subject knowledge, high expectations and good relationships with pupils. As a result, pupils respond positively to a wide range of teaching strategies and collaborate well during group work.  All pupils have targets for improvements in reading and writing. Teachers provide effective feedback to pupils through marking, which is consistently good across the school. Pupils are well informed about their achievements and know how to improve their work. However, more use needs to be made of pupils’ targets, to challenge more able pupils to reach higher levels in writing.  Teaching assistants provide good-quality support for pupils, including those with special educational need and/or disabilities.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 The school has successfully developed an interesting and stimulating curriculum matched to the interests of pupils. A wide range of visits to places of interest and visitors to the school enhances learning. The recent visit of a local poet enthused pupils to write their own poetry.  A range of additional activities outside the school day enriches the curriculum. Pupils thoroughly enjoyed the Shakespeare drama work on ‘Romeo and Juliet’.  The resources for reading are broad and under further development. Pupils speak with enthusiasm about the books they have read in school and at home. They are able to articulate clearly their choice of author.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

The effectiveness of leadership and management in English is good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

 Senior leaders have a very clear and accurate understanding of the strengths and areas to develop in English and there is a common commitment to high standards and driving improvement. They have successfully created a culture where all staff work effectively and with a common purpose. This is evident in the whole-school approach to marking and feedback which successfully support pupils, enabling them to know how to improve their work.  The school has put in place a wide range of professional development opportunities which have successfully contributed to achieving consistently good-quality teaching.  Assessment procedures are good, providing essential information about pupils’ attainment and progress. Regular pupil progress meetings between teachers and senior leaders enable suitable intervention strategies to be put in place where underachievement has been identified.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 using pupils’ targets more effectively to challenge more able pupils to achieve higher levels in writing.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion