Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Dec 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Brown

  • Postcode verified

    LS23 7AQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingeffectivegood progresspositivestrengthsvery wellmake good progress
Criticismweaknessesnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings613w+92
  • Leadership118w+75
  • What needs to improve122w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
836
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms S Ulyett Headteacher Lady Elizabeth Hastings’ Church of England Primary School Dowkell Lane Thorp Arch Wetherby LS23 7AQ

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 November 2011 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; a tour of the school with pupils; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of a school assembly and four lessons including one observed jointly with you.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is good.

p.1

Achievement in ICT

 Pupils enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with levels of attainment in ICT which are above national expectations. They make good progress throughout the school and, by the end of Year 6, leave with standards that are above national averages. This represents good progress.  Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are given effective support by teachers and teaching assistants, and make the same good progress as other groups of pupils.  Pupils’ behaviour in lessons is outstanding. The use of ICT has a significant impact on the way pupils work together. Lesson observations and discussions with pupils indicate that they are very positive about ICT and are enthusiastic users of ICT to support their learning.  Pupils are supported to learn how to become responsible users of new technologies in lessons and through assemblies and by Year 6 pupils have a clear understanding of how to keep themselves safe when using new

p.1

Quality of teaching in ICT

 Teachers have good subject knowledge and use this to plan activities which engage and motivate pupils. Teachers and teaching assistants use an excellent range of resources to develop the independent learning skills of pupils. For example, in an outstanding Year 5 and 6 literacy lesson ICT was used to support pupils working in pairs to develop their writing skills; effective lesson planning and access to high-quality resources led to pupils making excellent progress in their understanding and use of journalistic writing.  Relationships between staff and pupils are excellent. Teachers have very high expectations, pupils’ behaviour is at least good and often outstanding, and lessons are a positive environment for pupils to learn.  The use of ICT to support learning across the school is good. Pupils have very good access to ICT and it is used appropriately in many curriculum areas to develop their learning. However, the use of assessment,

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

monitoring and tracking in ICT is at the early stages of development. Pupils are not involved in recording their achievements and so have no clear understanding of what they need to do to improve. The school recognises that this is an area for development.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

The quality of the curriculum in ICT is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

 All pupils receive their entitlement to the statutory ICT National Curriculum. The curriculum has been recently reviewed and ICT is now woven into schemes of work for all curriculum areas. There is a good emphasis on presenting information, communication and data-handling and plans are in place to improve access to data-logging and control.  Effective links are in place between ICT, literacy, numeracy and foundation subjects. This is having a very positive impact on pupils’ achievement.  The school has plans to develop a virtual learning environment (VLE) to enable better access to the curriculum for pupils from home.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

The effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT is outstanding.  Although new to the role, the subject coordinator has quickly evaluated the strengths and areas for development. ICT is very well led at subject level and plans are in place to develop the subject further to improve outcomes for pupils. Senior leaders have a good overview of strengths and weaknesses in ICT and have effective plans to develop the subject.  Technical support is good and ensures that systems are reliable and available when needed.  Staff have received training on how to keep pupils and themselves safe while using new technologies.  Self-evaluation is accurate and the school has a very good capacity to improve further.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving the quality of pupils’ learning and their progress in ICT by ensuring that pupils are involved in self-assessment and are aware of their individual targets for ICT, so that they know what they need to do to improve  enriching the ICT curriculum by developing the use of data-logging and control technology  ensuring that the school’s well-considered plans for ICT continue to be implemented.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion