Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Carole Skinner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carole Skinner

  • Postcode verified

    BN14 0DB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongexceptionallyconsistentlyeffectiveenjoysuccessfullyrigorousstrengths
Criticisminconsistenciesnot alwaysvariableweaknessesweakerunevengapsnot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings547w−30
  • Leadership134w+37
  • What needs to improve115w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
778
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Garratt Headteacher Vale First and Middle School Vale Avenue Worthing West Sussex BN14 0DB

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 November 2011 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observations of parts of lessons from Reception to Year 5.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of mathematics is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

Achievement in mathematics is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

 Variations in the quality of learning between classes and ability sets have resulted in uneven progress in across the school, despite consistently above average attainment in Year 6. Recent actions taken by the leadership team to iron out these inconsistencies are having a good impact to show strong signs of improvement.  More able pupils generally achieve well but middle- and lower-attaining pupils in upper Key Stage 2 often have gaps in their understanding of key concepts due to weaker teaching in previous years. Pupils demonstrate reasonable levels of accuracy when performing written and mental calculations but many are over-reliant on copying teachers’ methods without fully understanding why they arrive at a correct answer. This limits their ability to apply previous learning in unfamiliar situations.  Pupils are keen to learn and most say that they enjoy mathematics lessons. One Year 6 pupil commented, ‘If you make maths fun, it’s easier’

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

and others agreed that teachers make lessons interesting and challenging.  Many pupils, including the most able, do not use mathematical language precisely enough when explaining the calculations and strategies they have used.

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

The quality of teaching in mathematics is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

 Raised expectations and a comprehensive programme of staff training are having a beneficial impact on teaching. Much teaching is of good quality but inconsistencies remain, particularly in how well teachers enhance pupils’ depth of understanding. Teachers’ levels of confidence in their own subject knowledge are variable.  Teachers are making increasingly effective use of visual representations and practical apparatus to support learning, especially for pupils who take longer to grasp new concepts. Samples of work and discussions with pupils in Year 6 show that some have moved on too quickly from one concept to the next before understanding is secure.  The use of assessment to support learning is currently a focus for development. Pupils are given opportunities to assess their own understanding and teachers use this information with varying degrees of effectiveness to adapt their planning. Marking is variable in quality and

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

pupils are not always given the opportunity to follow up teachers’ comments.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

The quality of the curriculum in mathematics is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

 The focus on ensuring progression in knowledge and skills is clear across the school. Team planning in year groups aids greater consistency and the sharing of expertise.  All pupils are given opportunities to carry out mathematical investigations and solve problems, although these are often planned as separate lessons rather than being routinely integrated into day-to-day learning.  Carefully planned and targeted support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is helping them to overcome difficulties, in lessons and when given tuition individually or in a small group. An early morning mathematics club provides additional support for pupils who are struggling with particular concepts.  While some links with other subjects, such as art, science and design and technology, are evident, opportunities for incorporating mathematics into class topics and themes are not fully exploited. In part this is because it is

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

taught as a discrete subject in ability sets.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics

The effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics

 You have successfully established a strong mathematics curriculum team with a shared vision for improvement, which is being driven at a rapid pace, fuelled by the school’s success in accelerating progress in literacy last year.  As a result of a range of rigorous monitoring activities, including the innovative ‘Day in the Life’ in-depth evaluation of a year group, leaders have a good understanding of the subject’s strengths and weaknesses.  Exceptionally thorough analysis of progress data for a wide range of groups has resulted in challenging targets for improvement which inform the programme of staff training.  Although lesson observations evaluate learning, they do not always highlight how well pupils of different abilities within a set or class are developing conceptual understanding.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that teaching is consistently effective in securing pupils’ understanding of key concepts before moving them on to the next stage of learning  enhancing teachers’ subject knowledge and confidence across all aspects of mathematics  integrating opportunities for pupils to use, apply and extend their mathematical knowledge, understanding and skills in day-to-day mathematics lessons and through other subjects.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion