Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Carole Skinner
- Postcode verified
BN14 0DB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You have successfully established a strong mathematics curriculum team with a shared vision for improvement, which is being driven at a rapid pace, fuelled by the school’s success in accelerating progress in literacy last year. p.3
- Exceptionally thorough analysis of progress data for a wide range of groups has resulted in challenging targets for improvement which inform the programme of staff training. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school. p.3
- As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
- A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 778
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr M Garratt Headteacher Vale First and Middle School Vale Avenue Worthing West Sussex BN14 0DB
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 November 2011 to look at work in mathematics.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observations of parts of lessons from Reception to Year 5.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The overall effectiveness of mathematics is satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement in mathematics
Achievement in mathematics is satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement in mathematics
Variations in the quality of learning between classes and ability sets have resulted in uneven progress in across the school, despite consistently above average attainment in Year 6. Recent actions taken by the leadership team to iron out these inconsistencies are having a good impact to show strong signs of improvement. More able pupils generally achieve well but middle- and lower-attaining pupils in upper Key Stage 2 often have gaps in their understanding of key concepts due to weaker teaching in previous years. Pupils demonstrate reasonable levels of accuracy when performing written and mental calculations but many are over-reliant on copying teachers’ methods without fully understanding why they arrive at a correct answer. This limits their ability to apply previous learning in unfamiliar situations. Pupils are keen to learn and most say that they enjoy mathematics lessons. One Year 6 pupil commented, ‘If you make maths fun, it’s easier’
p.1
Achievement in mathematics
and others agreed that teachers make lessons interesting and challenging. Many pupils, including the most able, do not use mathematical language precisely enough when explaining the calculations and strategies they have used.
p.2
Quality of teaching in mathematics
The quality of teaching in mathematics is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of teaching in mathematics
Raised expectations and a comprehensive programme of staff training are having a beneficial impact on teaching. Much teaching is of good quality but inconsistencies remain, particularly in how well teachers enhance pupils’ depth of understanding. Teachers’ levels of confidence in their own subject knowledge are variable. Teachers are making increasingly effective use of visual representations and practical apparatus to support learning, especially for pupils who take longer to grasp new concepts. Samples of work and discussions with pupils in Year 6 show that some have moved on too quickly from one concept to the next before understanding is secure. The use of assessment to support learning is currently a focus for development. Pupils are given opportunities to assess their own understanding and teachers use this information with varying degrees of effectiveness to adapt their planning. Marking is variable in quality and
p.2
Quality of teaching in mathematics
pupils are not always given the opportunity to follow up teachers’ comments.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in mathematics
The quality of the curriculum in mathematics is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in mathematics
The focus on ensuring progression in knowledge and skills is clear across the school. Team planning in year groups aids greater consistency and the sharing of expertise. All pupils are given opportunities to carry out mathematical investigations and solve problems, although these are often planned as separate lessons rather than being routinely integrated into day-to-day learning. Carefully planned and targeted support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is helping them to overcome difficulties, in lessons and when given tuition individually or in a small group. An early morning mathematics club provides additional support for pupils who are struggling with particular concepts. While some links with other subjects, such as art, science and design and technology, are evident, opportunities for incorporating mathematics into class topics and themes are not fully exploited. In part this is because it is
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in mathematics
taught as a discrete subject in ability sets.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics
The effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics is good.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics
You have successfully established a strong mathematics curriculum team with a shared vision for improvement, which is being driven at a rapid pace, fuelled by the school’s success in accelerating progress in literacy last year. As a result of a range of rigorous monitoring activities, including the innovative ‘Day in the Life’ in-depth evaluation of a year group, leaders have a good understanding of the subject’s strengths and weaknesses. Exceptionally thorough analysis of progress data for a wide range of groups has resulted in challenging targets for improvement which inform the programme of staff training. Although lesson observations evaluate learning, they do not always highlight how well pupils of different abilities within a set or class are developing conceptual understanding.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
ensuring that teaching is consistently effective in securing pupils’ understanding of key concepts before moving them on to the next stage of learning enhancing teachers’ subject knowledge and confidence across all aspects of mathematics integrating opportunities for pupils to use, apply and extend their mathematical knowledge, understanding and skills in day-to-day mathematics lessons and through other subjects.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion