Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Peckham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Peckham

  • Postcode verified

    M20 6BX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivefeel safeconfidentrespectfulricheffectivelyindependentclear
Criticismconcernsseriousseriouslynot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings367w+33
  • What needs to improve173w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
531
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C McCarron The Barlow RC High School Parrs Wood Road East Didsbury Manchester M20 6BX

p.1

bullying practice in schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 27 September 2011 as part of our survey of schools’ work to create a positive school culture and prevent and tackle bullying.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Relationships between students and between staff and students are very positive. The high levels of staff supervision during breaks and lunchtimes provide security for students. They are frequently characterised by relaxed and positive exchanges between members of staff and students.  Thanks to high-profile assemblies on bullying and behaviour-related topics, students are confident that bullying issues will be taken seriously by the school. They know who to talk with should they have concerns and they feel safe in and around the school.  There is a good broad understanding of the expectation that students should be respectful towards each other.  Although only recently introduced, some good elements within the curriculum include the innovative ‘RICH time’ (Responsible, Independent, Christian, Human beings), which has the potential to provide powerful impact in tutorial time, although this has not yet been evaluated.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Behaviour and anti-bullying policies provide clear procedures and strategies to encourage consistency. They address different types of bullying, offer support to victims and include details of structured intervention for those responsible for bullying. Strategies such as the online ‘SHARP’ system, which enables anonymous reporting of bullying incidents or concerns, support this.  Transition arrangements are good. Induction processes for Year 7 students are thorough. They quickly gain confidence and feel safe at school. Students who join at other times in their school career are also introduced early to the school’s systems for dealing with bullying, so that they are less vulnerable.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 providing a greater coherence and simplicity to the way in which behaviour expectations are communicated to and with pupils, to help them understand how reducing low-level unpleasant behaviour can also reduce potentially more serious bullying  providing whole school opportunities for students to discuss and reflect on the use of potentially offensive language and behaviour between friends, so that they have a better understanding of the contribution that low-level behaviours such as this have on the overall climate  continuing the development of a more systematic analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data around student conduct and relationships, including bullying, so that the impact of curricular and other actions can be evaluated more effectively.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that this visit has been useful in the further development of this aspect of the school’s work.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion