Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Stephen McShane
- Postcode verified
EX5 1EA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that this visit has been useful in the further development of this aspect of the school’s work. p.2
- As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.2
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.2
- A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 525
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr N Tancock Headteacher Woodbury Church Of England Primary School Castle Lane Woodbury Devon EX5 1EA
p.1
bullying practice in schools
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 6 October 2011 as part of our survey of schools’ work to create a positive school culture and prevent and tackle bullying.
p.1
bullying practice in schools
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
bullying practice in schools
This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.
p.1
Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work
The recent process of re-examining the school’s ethos and particular character as a church school in the Woodbury community has renewed the school’s focus on the personal, social and spiritual development of its pupils. It has given the whole school a shared language and commitment to the qualities it aims to develop so that pupils are successful citizens. Pupils know the school’s five core values of love, respect, cooperation, honesty and responsibility. They are developing an understanding of what these mean to them in their own daily lives. This is achieved through focused taught sessions, displays, symbolism in art and ongoing reinforcement throughout the day in learning activities. A friendship stop in the playground and the many responsibilities that the oldest pupils carry out are just two examples of how the five values are effectively put into practice in the school. Staff work together well as a team. High expectations, common ways of
p.1
Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work
working and strong communication result in a harmonious community and mean that any issues are quickly resolved. Pupils behave well. They say they feel safe. They are confident that when things go wrong or if they feel unhappy a member of staff will sort things out effectively. They like being able to use the ‘worry boxes’ so that they can tell teachers confidentially about any issues. A clear curriculum framework means that issues related to social and emotional development and bullying are regularly addressed and integrated into interesting topics. The school’s annual audit and review of the curriculum are an important part of highlighting any changes that are needed to address any particular areas that arise. The school is clear about the intended outcomes of special events that take place such as anti-bullying week or an emphasis on the e-saftey and cyber-bulllying. They ask pupils to assess their learning which means that
p.1
Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work
teachers can assess the effectiveness of their work.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
continuing to improve the assessment and monitoring of pupils’ personal and social development using the wealth of information available, systematically evaluating the school’s provision and pupils’ outcomes in personal and social development.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that this visit has been useful in the further development of this aspect of the school’s work.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion