Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Peckham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Peckham

  • Postcode verified

    M12 4WB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectivepositivevery wellstrongwell preparedeffectivelystronglypositively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings515w+87
  • What needs to improve152w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
658
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 23%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J McNerney Headteacher St Peter’s RC High School Kirkmanshulme Lane Manchester M12 4WB

p.1

bullying practice in schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 30 September 2011 as part of our survey of schools’ work to create a positive school culture and prevent and tackle bullying.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Induction processes are thorough. Year 7 are well prepared for their arrival, especially those who come from the key partner primary schools. Students know the expectations and what to do if they are being bullied. Those who join at other times are given a buddy and are well informed about the school, the rules and who to go to for support before they start. As a result, the students have a high level of confidence in the school and support its ethos and values.  The school’s curriculum provides very well for students’ personal, social and moral development. There is weekly personal, social, citizenship and health education for all students together with highly effective use of the religious education programme to promote key ideas. Theme weeks and additional days are also used very effectively to promote particular aspects of behaviour and anti-bullying. For example, the Exceeding Expectations programme tackling homphobia and the recent programme in Year 7 on

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

cyber-bullying have had a significant impact in raising awareness of individual responsibility and students’ use of language. Links to schools in the USA looking at gang culture and the unit of work on Travellers, delivered through Years 7, 8 and 9 help students to gain a very broadly based understanding of diversity.  The school community is strongly cohesive. Students speak positively about diversity and respect for each other. The majority clearly recognise that racism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated by the school.  Students generally have a good understanding of what constitutes bullying. They understand their responsibility not to collude with bullying and often express a willingness to intervene to protect someone who is being bullied. The school is continually developing its approaches to counter bullying such as cyber and homophobic bullying.  There is good provision of safe spaces such as the library, the lunchtime

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

club room and the patio, where students who want a quieter and more protected break and lunch can go. Staff support and activities are available.  There is strong evidence that, during their five years in the school, students benefit substantially from the school’s work to help them build respect for each other and develop their interpersonal skills. There is a common thread about respect which emerges from discussions with staff and students, indicating a good deal of agreement over shared values.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing the way in which the school records and reports on bullying and other behaviour incidents to include information about the basis of the bullying such as perceptions about disability, sexuality or race  analysing the data provided so that patterns about places, times and other circumstances can improve the school’s understanding of victims and contexts and the impact of strategies to address changing issues  drawing together the various positive elements of behaviour, anti-bullying and anti-discrimination activity into one coherent, overarching policy and strategy, clearly linked to the school's vision and values.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that this visit has been useful in the further development of this aspect of the school’s work.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion