Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Anne Taylor
- Postcode verified
CV32 5JE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 632
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Mariane Cavalli Principal Warwickshire College Warwick New Road Leamington Spa Warwickshire CV32 5JE
p.1
in the lifelong learning/further education sector
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your provision in the week beginning 17 October 2011. Please pass my thanks on to your staff for the time they gave to our telephone discussions and for the information which they provided before and during the inspection.
p.1
in the lifelong learning/further education sector
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and to a published national overview report. This report will identify the overall quality of provision leading to Awarding Body qualifications and identify the overall strengths and areas for development. However, in line with previous practice, inspectors will not make graded judgements of the quality of the provision in each centre; they will evaluate and feed back identified strengths and any points for further development. These are outlined below for your centre.
p.1
in the lifelong learning/further education sector
The published overview report will list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.
p.1
Outcomes for trainees
Recruitment is high on the free-standing Preparation to Teach in the Lifelong Learning Sector (PTLLS) programme which also delivers the preliminary unit of the Certificate in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector (CTLLS) programme. Success rates are consistently high on both the PTLLS and CTLLS programmes for all groups of trainees when compared with national averages. Progression from the PTLLS programme to the CTLLS or Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector (DTLLS) programme is low. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 1231231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Trainees are highly reflective and enthusiastic learners, fully committed to delivering active and varied sessions for their learners. They have developed good, supportive and productive relationships with their learners, peers and tutors. Trainees on the CTLLS programme are employed in support or associate roles and have been
p.1
Outcomes for trainees
recruited onto the most appropriate programme. They have good subject knowledge and have gained confidence in their ability to teach while on the course.
p.2
The key strengths are:
trainees’ extensive and up-to-date knowledge of their specialist area the experienced and knowledgeable team of teacher trainers who provide high quality central training. Trainees can see the relevance of this training to their teaching. They value the good variety of approaches used, the modelling of good practice and how they are supported in sharing ideas especially through peer assessment opportunities the high quality of personal support for trainees. Tutors know their trainees well and ensure they are accessible to trainees in person and through electronic media. Trainees value the helpful and rapid response they receive to communications tutors’ close monitoring of trainees’ achievements which helps them to succeed the encouraging, informative and rapid feedback trainees receive on written assignments and following observations the flexibility staff have built into the programme enabling trainees to attend a
p.2
The key strengths are:
range of sessions and be assessed at times convenient to their varied work-loads the well-developed learning channel within the college’s virtual learning environment which trainees access from home and work the rigorous assessment and internal verification processes the accuracy of self-assessment and identification of the priorities for further improvement.
p.2
The key areas for development are:
ensuring that all trainees receive specialist observation and support, including those not employed by the college introducing a more structured assessment of trainees’ potential and progress, with clear targets and actions, monitoring these rigorously and systematically so that all trainees recognise their achievements and priorities for improvement encouraging trainees to use their reflective logs to evaluate all aspects of their training, including their own teaching and assessments, so these inform their practice addressing all identified improvement points in a timely manner. As explained in the inspection guidance, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion