Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Shaun Dillon
- Postcode verified
SS65 1EG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 911
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Gill Alton Principal Rotherham College of Arts and Technology Town Centre Campus Eastwood Lane Rotherham SS65 1EG Dear Mrs Alton
p.1
in the lifelong learning/further education sector
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your provision between 17 and 21 October 2011, for the time you gave to our telephone discussion and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection.
p.1
in the lifelong learning/further education sector
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and to a published national overview report. This report will identify the overall quality of provision leading to Awarding Body qualifications and identify the overall strengths and areas for development. However, in line with previous practice, inspectors will not make graded judgements of the quality of the provision in each centre; they will evaluate and feed back identified strengths and any points for further development. These are outlined below for your centre.
p.1
in the lifelong learning/further education sector
The published overview report will list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.
p.1
Outcomes for trainees
The success rate of the small number of trainees on the Certificate in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector (CTLLS) course in 2010/11 is very low, due mainly to very low retention rates. Success rates on the Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector (DTLLS) course have improved in the last three years at a rate greater than the increase in the national averages, but they are low. Male trainees are much less successful than female trainees. Approximately one-third of trainees completing DTLLS in 2011 progressed to a Bachelor degree in education and training.
p.1
Outcomes for trainees
Most trainees make good progress with their academic writing, self-reflection and teaching and learning. They have very good relations with their learners, care for Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618
p.1
Outcomes for trainees
enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
them and are committed to improving their knowledge and skills. In the best lessons, all learners are fully engaged and learning is taking place, prompted by the most appropriate use of information and learning technology (ILT) and very good and searching directed questioning. The standard of learners’ work and their rate of progress are good. Trainees provide very helpful practical and current examples to illustrate topics, which aid learners’ understanding very effectively. In the less effective lessons, trainees do not plan thoroughly. They do not ensure that all learners are engaged in useful activities suited to their individual needs. Learners make slow progress and do not work at the required level. Questioning is too general and shallow, such that the same learners respond each time and others remain passive. Trainees miss opportunities to use ILT when it would help learners learn.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The course is very effective in increasing trainees’ awareness of equality and diversity matters. Trainees are not well prepared, however, for teaching in different settings in the diverse lifelong learning sector, other than through discussion with their peers. The course does not prepare them sufficiently well to teach learners with literacy and numeracy needs, learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and learners with challenging behaviour. Many former and current trainees are unable to claim Qualified Teacher Learning and Skills (QTLS) status because they do not have intermediate level qualifications in literacy and/or numeracy.
p.2
The key strengths are:
trainees’ extensive and current knowledge of their specialist area which they use very effectively to gain the interest and respect of their learners the very constructive feedback by trainers on trainees’ academic writing and following observations of their lessons which challenges trainees to think and act differently and helps them to progress well-qualified staff and very committed managers and trainers who, following a major restructuring, are determined to improve the quality of provision and the outcomes of their trainees the self-critical and realistic self-assessment of the provision which informs very effectively the quality improvement plan which, in turn, prioritises the need to improve trainees’ outcomes.
p.2
The key areas for development are:
increase the promotion of the provision to those groups and communities currently under represented in teacher education courses and in the lifelong learning sector improve the rigour of the initial advice and guidance and recruitment and selection procedures to include the assessment of the literacy and numeracy skills of each applicant and to ensure that each trainee has the potential to cope with the academic demands of the course
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
improve the implementation of the systems to determine that all trainees have current checks on their suitability to work with young people and vulnerable adults improve the provision and monitoring of subject-specialist mentoring so that trainees, especially those new to teaching and learning, are helped to teach their subject areas very effectively increase the quality and frequency of the review of individual learning plans and target setting so that trainees know best how to address their main areas for development improve trainers’ and trainees’ skills in the use of the virtual learning environment and ILT, so that trainees and their learners benefit from experiencing different interactive and interesting activities, which aid their understanding and learning increase the emphasis given to, and the use of, the views of trainees, employers and teaching practice providers to inform the self-assessment report and quality
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
improvement plan improve the rigour of course reviews and the monitoring of the quality improvement plan targets, so that current trainees benefit from the implementation of the required actions.
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
As explained in the inspection guidance, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion