Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ann Ashdown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ann Ashdown

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−23Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlygood progressfailedpoliteimprovedaccuratetimelyswiftly
Criticisminadequatelackinsufficientvariablebelowlownot independent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings881w−56
  • What needs to improve117w+75

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
992
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566957 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: landerton@cfbt.com

p.1

Acting Headteacher Maryport CofE Junior School Camp Road Maryport Cumbria CA15 6JN

p.1

Junior School

Thank you for the help which you, your pupils and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 2 November 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. I also welcomed the opportunity to talk with the Chair of the Governing Body and three representatives from the local authority.

p.1

Junior School

The headteacher is currently absent from the school having taken extended sick leave in May 2011. She has been replaced by an acting headteacher seconded from a local school. The acting headteacher joined the school on 1 June 2011 and is due to stay in post until the end of the autumn term 2011. Since the last inspection, there has been considerable staff turbulence due to illness and maternity leave. The school roll has fallen by 18 pupils. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities has dropped markedly and is now average.

p.1

Junior School

As a result of the inspection on 6 May 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Junior School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made inadequate progress in making improvements and inadequate progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Junior School

Attainment in the most recent tests and assessments at the end of Year 6 in 2011, which is currently unvalidated national data, was broadly average in English but below average in mathematics. This cohort of pupils made less than the expected progress from their above average starting points when they entered the school. Different groups of pupils make variable rates of progress. While most higher-attaining pupils made the progress expected of them, middle and lower-attaining pupils did not and failed to make the expected progress in both English and mathematics. The school’s and the local authority’s tracking data show that many current pupils are not making the progress of which they are capable and are unlikely to meet their targets this year, especially in mathematics. September 2011

p.1

Junior School

Page2 In lessons seen during the monitoring inspection, teaching was satisfactory. In the best lessons, teachers make work relevant and use interesting tasks and resources to engage pupils’ interest. For example, pupils were seen really enjoying learning as they designed leaflets and radio broadcasts about a forthcoming bonfire night party. However, most lessons lack the higher level of pace and challenge needed to accelerate pupils’ progress sufficiently to compensate for their previous underachievement. In some lessons, teachers talk for too long and pupils have insufficient opportunities to work independently and at their own pace. Pupils are polite and compliant. However, their behaviour for learning is less well developed. Many lack the independent learning skills needed to enable them to make faster progress. Extra support for pupils including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities is now more timely and sharply focused although the full impact of the

p.2

Junior School

effectiveness of this support has not been evaluated. The fall in numbers who are identified as having special educational needs and/or disabilities is due to changes in the way the school assesses pupils’ needs.

p.2

Junior School

The rigour and accuracy of assessment of pupils’ work has improved since the last inspection. In the books of pupils in Year 3, there are examples of good practice in marking and feedback to pupils which are helping them to improve their work. However, this good practice is not shared across the school. Pupils are now set appropriate targets in English but not in mathematics.

p.2

Junior School

The recently appointed acting headteacher has brought vision, harmony and stability to the school. She has made all staff more aware of, and accountable for, the progress of pupils in their classes. Teaching and learning are monitored more regularly and constructive support, advice and further training are all beginning to improve the quality of teaching and learning. Pupils’ progress is now being checked more rigorously and systematically. Members of the governing body are better informed about the work of the school. Links with the adjacent infant school are developing well. However, these improvements are from a very low base, are very recent and it is too early to measure the impact on outcomes for pupils. The roles of other senior leaders are in the very early stages of development as the literacy, numeracy, curriculum and special educational needs coordinators are all new to their posts. All of this, combined with uncertainty about the future leadership of the school, contributes

p.2

Junior School

to the school’s current inadequate progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.2

Junior School

The acting headteacher has welcomed the recent support she has received from the local authority in monitoring teaching and learning, identifying immediate priorities for improvement and formulating a raising achievement plan. September 2011

p.2

Junior School

Page3 I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Junior School

Ann Ashdown Additional inspector September 2011

p.3

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Raise standards in English, mathematics and science throughout the school, by July 2011, by:  ensuring that teaching is consistently good or better across the school to enable all pupils to make at least good progress  ensuring that teachers set appropriately challenging tasks and activities for all groups of pupils.

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management in driving improvement and swiftly intervening to support pupils who may not be making as much progress as they should by:  systematically and rigorously checking pupils’ progress based on accurate assessments using consistently applied measures of success  ensuring that assessments are consistently accurate and used to set appropriate targets for individuals and groups of pupils.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion