Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adrian Guy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adrian Guy

  • Postcode verified

    DE23 4BZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongpositiveeffectivesuccessfulstrengthseffectivelyclearlysecure
Criticismtoo ofteninsufficientmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings514w+24
  • Leadership178w+68
  • What needs to improve123w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
799
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Venkatesh Headteacher Littleover Community School Pastures Hill Littleover Derby DE23 4BZ

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 18 and 19 October 2011 to look at work in music.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, students and the head of Derbyshire City and County Music Partnership; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of eight class lessons, two instrumental lessons, and an extra- curricular musical rehearsal.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

The overall effectiveness of music is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in music

 Students enter Year 7 with skills that are broadly in line with those expected for their age, although many have had additional music experiences in their primary schools through the Wider Opportunities programme. By the end of Key Stage 3, students’ attainment is broadly average.  Of the small proportion of students who continue with music in Key Stage 4, most start with attaiment above that generally expected at Key Stage 3 and attain above average outcomes at GCSE. Their progress in performing is stronger than in other elements, as a result of all students receiving additional instrumental tuition.  The very small numbers of students who take A-level courses are taught in partnership with another local school in the shared sixth form. In those aspects taught at the school, observations show that students are making satisfactory progress and attain above average standards.  The contribution of music to the school’s ethos and students’ personal

p.1

Achievement in music

well-being is strong. Students speak warmly of their teachers and behaviour is good in lessons and in extra-curricular activities.  Participation in music activities is broadly satisfactory although there is under-representation from certain groups - most noticably boys, students with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those from minority ethnic backgrounds.

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

The quality of teaching in music is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

 In lessons where teaching is stronger, students are given criteria to help them identify the features of sucessful musical responses and these are clearly explained by the teacher. However, too often outcomes are focused on aspects of organsiation and task completion. As a result, opportunities are missed for both teachers and students to demonstrate their expectations or understanding through music.  Lessons are well organised and students’ good behaviour makes a positive contribution to learning. However, too frequently in lessons all students start from the same point and little account is taken of their different starting points or prior musical development and abilities.  Effective instrumental and vocal lessons are well organised and make a strong contribution to students’ standards of performance in Key Stage 4.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in music

The quality of the curriculum in music is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in music

 While schemes of work in Key Stage 3 identify aspects of skill development, they are focused on technical aspects rather than a deeper sense of musical progression. While the breadth of listening activities is appropriate, there is insufficient planning for the development of singing of the musical use of information and communication technology (ICT) across the key stages. Similarly, in Key Stages 4 and 5 planning is brief and focused on examination specifications and criteria.  A satisfactory range of ensemble activities is available, including choirs, bands, a jazz group and arts festival which alternate with the bi-annual musical theatre production which is highly valued by the school.  The partnership with Derbyshire City and County Music Partnership is successful in promoting high standards of performance for those who receive instrumental tuition.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

The effectiveness of leadership and management in music is satisfactory.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

 Leaders and managers have a secure grasp of the strengths and areas for development within music provision in the school. They have identified correct priorities for improvement. There is a shared vision between the joint heads of music who understand the need to develop sense of musical progression within schemes of work and have identified aspects of provision which need further development.  The music staff display a strong sense of unity and work well as a team. Teachers’ professional development has been mainly concerned with developing Key Stage 4 examination courses. Although the school is aware of initiatives in primary music education, including the ‘Wider Opportunities’ initiative, it recognises that more consideration needs to be given to how teaching and the curriculum build on this work.  The school works effectively in partnership with Derbyshire City and County Music Partnership to provide free instrumental and vocal lessons

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

for GCSE students and as a result students attain high standards of performance which are celebrated by the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that there is an overarching sense of musical progression throughout the Key Stage 3 curriculum and in lesson planning and that there are sufficient and sustained development of singing and the musical use of ICT  ensuring that teaching takes account of students’ prior musical learning and abilities and that opportinuities are maximised for both teachers and students to demonstrate their expectations or understanding through music.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop music in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion