Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Limm

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Limm

  • Postcode verified

    CV1 2BA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+97Very positivemore positive than 99% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingextremelystronghighly effectiveclearlyrapid progressexcellent relationships
Criticismweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings648w+96
  • Leadership143w+86
  • What needs to improve82w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
852
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Dr J Roberts Headteacher The Coventry Blue Coat CofE School and Music College Terry Road Coventry CV1 2BA

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 18 and 19 October 2011 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of nine lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The overall effectiveness of history is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in history

 Attainment is high throughout the school and students of all abilities and groups make excellent progress in developing their historical skills and understanding. Students engage enthusiastically in a wide range of stimulating activities both inside and outside the classroom, such as finding out from survivors of the Blitz in Coventry what life was like during the Second World War. Students in the sixth form enjoy learning about the Tudors and aspects of the modern world and they achieve extremely well.  Students’ personal development is outstanding in history. One student, who had not liked history in her previous school, found ‘history here is just so challenging and thought-provoking’. Students like learning about the past to compare it with the present. They are able to talk extremely well about the events and people they have studied.  Behaviour is outstanding in lessons and students learn well both in groups

p.1

Achievement in history

and on their own. They demonstrate a thirst to know as much about history topics as they can.  Students are encouraged to present their work and ideas clearly to the rest of their group and then the whole class. They do this extremely well and with confidence.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

The quality of teaching in history is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

 All teachers are qualified history specialists and they use their excellent subject knowledge extremely well to plan dynamic and engaging lesson activities which enable students to make rapid progress in learning about the key concepts and skills through each key stage.  Teachers develop excellent relationships with students. There is a constant challenge for students to achieve their best in lessons. All teachers encourage students to reflect carefully about how to interrogate evidence to write well analytically and to use different kinds of evidence to support their arguments. Throughout the key stages students learn to perfect their understanding of interpretation and causation.  Teachers use an extremely good and wide range of approaches to enable students to think carefully about their work and how to develop their literacy skills. Students have excellent opportunities to argue with each other and to write discursively in essays and other forms of extended

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

writing.  Teachers make excellent use of information and communication technology (ICT) to improve students’ learning. For example, students are encouraged to demonstrate their thoughts on interactive whiteboards and to use the computers available to access the department’s bank of resources to research topics and tasks.  The assessment of work is excellent, but although most students’ work is marked clearly and very well, not all students fully understand from teachers’ comments how to improve their work and what to do to improve at a faster rate.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

The quality of the curriculum in history is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

 The school has developed a Key Stage 3 curriculum that matches students’ needs extremely well. It is well thought out and linked very carefully to regular assessments. Where students have undertaken a two-year programme they can opt to study history to GCSE in one year, and they do this very successfully. You are clear that history will be a key programme of study for students at GCSE, should they wish to opt for it, which they do in increasing numbers.  The emphasis on developing students’ historical knowledge and understanding is outstanding. These aspects are strengthened by strong and well-planned links with other subjects, such as modern foreign languages when students study French influence following the battle of Hastings or French culture at the time of the French Revolution. There are also very good links with the school’s music specialism.  The department organises an excellent range of visits to places of

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

historical interest locally, as well as nationally and abroad.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

The effectiveness of leadership and management in history is outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

 The head of department is an impressive subject leader and manager. She has an excellent understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of her department, which the sharp and clear departmental self-evaluation demonstrates extremely well. The subject is monitored rigorously and subject evaluations and improvement plans indicate clearly how teachers simply cannot sit on their laurels, no matter how experienced they are within the school.  A constant drive to improve teaching approaches is reinforced by the school’s strong links with university tutors and teacher training programmes at two nearby universities. Two members of the department have undertaken active research projects which are having a demonstrably positive effect on the performance of the department.  The monitoring of teaching is highly effective and is supported by regular work reviews and discussions with students.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 making sure that teachers’ comments in books and files are fully understood by students so that all of them know clearly what they have to do to improve their work and understand how well they are doing over time.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion